PSN Library Files

Changes in Post-Polio Survivors Over Five Years

Changes in Post-Polio Survivors Over Five Years: Symptoms and Reactions to Treatments.

Mary T. Westbrook, PhD.

Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney.

Proceedings of the 12th World Congress, International Federation of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sydney, March 1995.

Lincolnshire Post-Polio Library copy by kind permission of the author.

Mary T. Westbrook, PhD

Faculty of Health Sciences

The University of Sydney

ABSTRACT

A group of 176 people with post-polio syndrome, identified using Ramlow et al’s (1992) criteria, took part in a 5 year follow-up survey. Most reported increased muscle

weakness (91%), fatigue (91%), muscle pain (80%), joint pain (64%) and changes in walking (60%). Increases in other symptoms occurred in less than half the group. Cramps, sensitivity to cold, muscle atrophy and muscle twitching were the symptoms most likely to have stabilised. The average respondent reported greater difficulty in carrying out 4 of the 8 activities of daily living investigated. Respondents were

significantly less anxious and depressed about their condition at follow-up. Degree of post-polio changes reported at the time of the first survey was a better predictor of decline during the five years than were initial polio histories or psycho-social variables. Health practitioners most likely to have been consulted were general practitioners and physiotherapists. Specialists in rehabilitation medicine were rated as providing more beneficial treatment than other medical practitioners. Treatments reported to provide good symptom relief included massage and water activities but not exercise. Life style modifications associated with pacing, reduced activity and rest were particularly effective. Overall 68% of respondents considered there was much they could do to control post-polio symptoms.

There have been relatively few longitudinal studies of people with post-polio syndrome and these have concentrated on changes in muscle strength. Researchers who have reported no significant loss of muscle strength at the time of follow-up (Agre & Rodriguez, 1991; Munin et al., 1991; Munsat et al., 1987) have retested their subjects after relatively brief periods of time (one year in the case of Agre & Rodriguez)

and/or have used very small samples. Studies which have encompassed longer time spans report a gradual progression of symptoms. Mulder et al. (1972) found a decline in 34 cases whom they observed over a period of from one to eighteen years. Dalakas et al. (1986) conducted an eight year follow up of 27 cases and reported an average loss of muscle strength of 1% per year. While the meaning of this value has been questioned (Grimby et al., 1994) as it was based on scores derived from manual muscle tests (which are qualitative rather than quantitative in nature) Dalakas et al.’s results suggest that typically muscle strength declines. Grimby et al. (1994) measured knee muscle strength in 20 polio survivors whom they had studied five years previously. At that time only 12 reported post polio symptoms. At follow-up subjects were asked whether or not they had experienced any new weakness in their legs. The muscle strength of the former group (those reporting new weakness) was found to have decreased significantly and far more than could he attributed to normal ageing. Some losses were also observed in people who had described their strength as stable. In their conclusion Grimby et al. emphasised the validity of post-polio subjects’ perceptions of increased weakness.

Thus to date research has concentrated on loss of muscle strength rather than on the progression, stabilisation or emergence of other post-polio symptoms and the effects of such symptoms on people’s lives. As Dalakas et al. (1986) observed, relatively slight tosses in muscle strength have “a substantial effect on neuromuscular function in patients in whom polio had caused severe disability and limited muscle reserve i.e. patients who at best were functioning below 50 percent of their total strength” (p. 962). While many researchers have examined the effects of particular treatments such as drugs or exercise protocols on post-polio symptoms (e.g. Fillyaw et al., 1991; Trojan et al., 1993), no one has surveyed patients about the range of treatments and life style changes they have adopted in their attempts to cope with post-polio symptoms or how successful these have been in providing symptom relief.

The first aim of the present research was to follow up people identified five years previously as having post-polio syndrome in order to determine whether their physical symptoms had progressed or new symptoms had emerged, whether they were experiencing any new difficulties in performing daily living activities and whether the elevated levels of anxiety and depression found in the group at the time of the first survey had altered (Westbrook, 1991, 1994). The second aim of the study was to identify the treatments respondents had received and the life style modifications they had made in their attempts to cope with post-polio symptoms and to ascertain how successful these were in relieving symptoms. A third aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with deterioration in health status over the time. Severity of initial attack of polio has been shown by a number studies (Jubelt & Druker, 1993; Trojan et al., 1994) including the initial survey in the present research (Westbrook, 1991) to be the best predictor of whether a polio survivor will develop late effects. Does this also predict progression of symptoms?

METHOD

Five years previously a mail survey of 318 polio survivors had been conducted to examine their health status (Westbrook, 1991). These questionnaires were distributed primarily by post-polio support groups in two states. They sent questionnaires to members and to all survivors who contacted them following media publicity concerning late effects of polio. Of the 280 respondents who wrote their addresses on the questionnaire to indicate their willingness to take part in a follow-up survey, 217 were identified as having post-polio syndrome using the criteria Ramlow et al. (1992) demonstrated to be a valid indicator of physicians’ diagnoses of the syndrome. Of these 217 who were mailed the follow-up questionnaire, 176 (81 %) completed it, 14 had moved and had no forwarding address, 8 had died, 2 returned their questionnaires late and 18 did not respond.

The characteristics of the respondent sample are shown in Table 1. Age at follow-up ranged from 33-77

years and averaged 57 years. The median age at the onset of polio had been 8 years. Fifty-four percent of the sample were hospitalised for over six months. The Klingman index (Klingman et al., 1988) of severity of initial attack assigns one point for each limb affected by polio and one for back and for chest. Forty five percent of the sample obtained a score of four or more.

The questionnaire consisted of 31 questions. Those relevant to this presentation will be described with the results.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Changes in Symptoms

Numerous studies (e.g. Halstead & Rossi, 1985; Westbrook, 1991) have demonstrated that the most frequent post-polio symptoms are muscle weakness, fatigue and muscle pain. The present follow-up study found that these were the symptoms most likely to be reported as having increased over time. As shown in Table 2, 91% of respondents said that they had experienced new or increased muscle weakness and fatigue over the past five years and 80% reported new or increased muscle pain.

Respondents were asked whether they had experienced any of 12 other commonly reported post-polio symptoms in the last five years and, if present, whether the symptom had increased or been stable over the period. Table 3 shows the percentages of respondents for whom symptoms had emerged or increased. This was most likely to occur in the case of joint pain (64% of the group), changes in walking (60%) and sensitivity to cold (48%). Symptoms most likely to be described as present but stable over the five years were cramps (35% of group), sensitivity to cold (34%), muscle atrophy (33%) and muscle twitching (30%). Overall the average respondent reported that eight symptoms emerged, or become worse in the period between the surveys.

Participants were asked whether they were experiencing any new difficulties in eight activities of daily living. The average respondent reported that his/her ability to carry out four of the activities was worse than five years previously. Meeting the physical demands of job, household choices [sic] and daily activities was described as harder by 87% of the sample. Increasing problems were experienced in climbing stairs by 85% (of those able to do so), in walking on level surfaces by 62% (of those able to walk), in getting in and out of bed (49%), in taking a bath or shower (48%), in getting dressed (40%), in using the toilet (28%) and in feeding oneself (8%).

At the time of first survey 31(18%) of the respondents included in the second survey reported that they had retired early because of post-polio symptoms. Of the 83 who were in employment during the next five years many were forced to make changes at work because of their symptoms. Some retired early or stopped work for the time being (23%), moved to part-time employment (13%), changed to less tiring work (8%) or changed their work routines (10%).

Survivors were more likely to use an aid or assistive device at follow-up (80%) than at the time of the first survey (62%) and people who used aids tended to use more (1.3 aids as apposed to 1.9 aids five year later). New aids most likely to have been adopted were walking sticks (18%), in-shoe orthoses (12%), manual (9%) or electric wheel chairs (8%) and electric scooters (6%).

In both surveys people were asked to write an account of their feelings about having post-polio symptoms. These accounts were content analysed to compare the levels of anxiety and depression that people were experiencing about their post-polio problems on the two occasions. Gottschalk and Gleser (1969) developed content analysis scales which may be applied to verbal material to provide valid and reliable

measures of feeling states. Particular words and references are scored and a correction factor is applied to take account of the length of the verbal sample obtained from the subject. These scales have been shown to be valid when applied to Australian English (Viney & Manton, 1973). In the present study Gottschalk

Gleser scales were applied to respondents’ accounts to measure anxiety (Total Anxiety Scale) and depression (Hostility Directed Inward Scale). Respondents expressed significantly greater anxiety closer to the onset of their symptoms than they did five years later (t = 4.4, p < .001, see Table 4). They were also significantly less depressed five years later (t = 4.4, p < .001, see Table 5).

Thus five years after the initial survey this group of people with post polio syndrome reported a marked increase in physical symptoms. The validity of respondents’ reports of symptom changes are supported by Grimby et al’s (1994) findings that polio survivors accurately report loss of muscle strength. An increase in survivors’ symptoms was associated with greater difficulty in carrying out daily activities and increased use of assistive devices. However the emotional distress that the group were experiencing closer to the onset of post-polio syndrome had significantly lessened. Despite an increase in symptoms most people were feeling better. However it should be noted that the anxiety and depression scores found in the follow up survey indicate that survivors were still experiencing considerable stress (Westbrook & Viney, 1977).

Reactions to treatments

In the five years between surveys the typical respondent consulted health practitioners from four professional groups regarding post-polio symptoms. The medical practitioners most frequently consulted were general practitioners (consulted by 86% of sample), specialists in rehabilitation medicine (40%), orthopaedists (39%) and neurologists (20%). Respondents were asked to rate the treatment they received as either “very helpful”, “some help” or “no help”. Table 6 shows the ratings assigned to their treatments by respondents consulting each medical speciality. Specialists in rehabilitation medicine were far more likely to be perceived as providing effective treatment and far less likely to be rated as providing no help than were other medical practitioners. Orthopaedists were the group least likely to be perceived as having been very helpful. The results indicate that many polio survivors are not being referred to the medical specialty most attuned to their needs. Although exact figures are not available, respondents’ comments suggested that many took the initiative in requesting their general practitioners for referrals to rehabilitation specialists after hearing through polio support group literature about these specialists’ work in post-polio clinics.

Practitioners from five allied health professions were consulted by over 20% of respondents. Physiotherapists were the group of health practitioners who were the second most likely to be consulted by survivors (61%). The consultancy rates for the other professions ranged from 31% for orthotists to 22% for chiropractors. Table 7 shows respondents’ satisfaction with treatments provided by allied health practitioners. Podiatrists and orthotists received the highest ratings. This may reflect the more specific problems about which they are typically consulted. It is noteworthy that chiropractic which has received little attention in the post-polio literature had more satisfied and fewer dissatisfied clients than did physiotherapy. This dissatisfaction may be partly due to prescription of exercise for patients for whom it is inappropriate (Dean et al., 1989; Halstead, 1994). Many treatments are prescribed by a range of health practitioners or may be self-prescribed. The survey identified twelve treatments which had been used by 10% or more of respondents in attempts to relieve post-polio symptoms (See Table 8). These ranged in frequency of adoption from 45% for taking analgesics to 10% for attending a stress management course. Again respondents were asked to rate whether the treatments were “very helpful”, “some help” or “no help” in relieving symptoms. Table 8 reveals that massage was found to be particularly helpful (67% of consumers rated it very helpful) as were water activities such as hot baths (59%) swimming (47%) and hydrotherapy (43%) although water aerobics (29%) was judged as less effective. Exercise programs

received a relatively low satisfaction rating (25%) and the highest dissatisfaction rating (31%). Special shoes were found to be very effective by the majority (55%) of those who adopted them. Analgesics provide good symptom relief for only a third of consumers.

Making life style changes was a common way of attempting to relieve symptoms. The majority of respondents reported that they now rested more (78%), had reduced their physical activity (69%), paced themselves (64%) and planned their lives more efficiently (53%) in an attempt to relieve symptoms. Approximately a third were getting their families to help more (39%), were employing household help, had bought special equipment/furniture and had modified their homes (all 31%). As shown in Table 9 all of these strategies were found to he very helpful by over half of those who adopted them and almost no one found them to be totally ineffective. Thus a range of treatments and lifestyle changes were reported as helpful in relieving post-polio symptoms. Two-thirds of the group (68%) agreed with the statement “There’s a lot I can do to control post-polio symptoms” although 79% acknowledge that “I worry about how much worse my post-polio symptoms will get”.

Factors associated with progression of symptoms

Severity of original attack of polio has been the factor most frequently found to predict risk of postpolio syndrome (Trojan et al., 1994; Westbrook, 1991). The relationship of severity of initial attack to degree of progression over the five year period was examined. Severity of initial polio as measured by the Klingman index, (Klingman et al., 1988) did not correlate significantly with progression as measured by the number of new or increased symptoms emerging over the five year period (r = .03, p > .05). However severity of initial attack did correlate significantly with current severity of condition as measured by the Klingman index (r = .52, p <.01). In other words people who were initially most severely affected by polio were still those most severely affected but severity of initial attack of polio did not predict degree of progression of post-polio symptoms once they had appeared.

At the time of the initial survey, severity of post-polio syndrome was measured in three ways viz. number of post-polio symptoms reported, number of activities of daily life that had become more difficult to carry out and number of body parts in which recent changes had been observed (Westbrook, 1991). Each of these correlated significantly with progression over the five years as measured by the number of symptoms that had emerged or intensified (r = .41, .22, .22 respectively, all p <.01). Other variables associated with respondents’ polio histories were examined viz, age at onset of polio, year in which polio was contracted, age at onset of post-polio symptoms and time since onset of post-polio. None were associated with progression over the five years of the study nor were the demographic factors of age or gender.

Progression was not significantly related to levels of anxiety (r = .12, p > .05) or depression (r = .09, p > .05) as measured by the Gottschalk Gleser scales at the time of the second survey. However progression was associated with the reporting of fewer positive and more negative recent experiences as measured by Bradburn’s (1969) scale of psychological well-being (r = -.28, p <.01). Thus there was evidence that those whose health had declined most were experiencing poorer quality of life.

Conclusion

The results confirm and elaborate the findings of previous lengthier longitudinal studies of post-polio syndrome (Dalakas et al., 1986; Grimby et al., 1994; Mulder et al., 1972) The syndrome typically appears to he progressive with the symptoms increasingly interfering with activities of living. However over time most people in the sample studied coped by trying a range of remedies, particularly treatments prescribed by health practitioners and life style modifications. Many of these helped to alleviate symptoms and

although respondents were physically less well at the time of follow-up, the group was significantly less anxious and depressed. However, respondents who had declined most over the five year period described their present lives less positively than did survivors whose symptoms had progressed more slowly.

Polio survivors who exhibited most syniptoms of post-polio in the initial survey were those reporting greater progression over the next five years. The reason why may become more apparent when the etiology of post-polio syndrome, which is still not fully understood (Jubelt & Druker, 1993), is elucidated.

REFERENCES

Agre, J.C. & Rodriguez, A.A. (1991). Neuromuscular function in polio survivors at one year follow up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 7-10. [PubMed Abstract]

Bradburn, N.M. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

Dalakas, M.C., Elder, G., Hallett, M., Ravits, J., Baker, M., Papadopoulos, N., Albrecht, P. & Sever, J. (1986). A long-term follow-up study of patients with post-poliomyelitis neuromuscular symptoms. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 959-963. [PubMed Abstract]

Dean, E., Ross, J. & Mcintyre. D. (1989). A rejoinder to “Exercise programs for patients with postpolio syndrome: A case report”: A short communication. Physical Therapy, 69, 695-699.

Fillyaw, M.J., Badger, G.J., Goodwin, G.D., Bradley, W.G., Fries, T.J., Shukla, A. (1991). The effects of long-term non-fatiguing resistance exercise in subjects with post-polio syndrome. Orthopedics, 14, 1253- 1256. [PubMed Abstract]

Gottschalk, L.A. & Gleser, G.C. (1969). The Measurement of Psychological States Through the Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Grimby, G., Hedberg, M. & Henning G.B. (1994). Changes in muscle morphology, strength and enzymes in a 4-5 year follow-up of subjects with poliomyelitis sequelae. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26, 121-130. [PubMed Abstract]

Halstead, L.S. (1994). Determining prescribed activity. Paper presented at the Sixth International Post polio and Independent Living Conference. St Louis, USA.

Halstead, L.S. & Rossi, C.D. (1985). New problems in old polio patients: Results of a survey of 539 polio survivors. Orthopedics, 8, 845-850. [PubMed Abstract]

Jubelt, B. & Druker, J. (1993). Post-polio syndrome: An update. Seminars in Neurology, 13, 283-290. [PubMed Abstract]

Klingman, J., Chui, H., Corgiat, M. & Perry, J. (1988). Functional recovery: A major risk factor for the development of post-poliomyelitis muscular atrophy. Archives of Neurology, 45, 645-647. [PubMed Abstract]

Mulder, D.W., Rosenbaum, R.A. & Layton, D.D. Late progression of poliomyelitis or forme fruste amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? (1972). Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 47, 756-761. [PubMed Abstract]

Munin, M.C., Jaweed, M.M., Staas, W.E., Satinsky, A.R., Gutierez, G. & Herbison, G.J. (1991). Postpoliomyelitis muscle weakness: A prospective study of quadriceps strength. Archives of Physical

Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 729-733. [PubMed Abstract]

Munsat, T.L., Andres, P. & Thibideau, L. (1987). Preliminary observations on long-term muscle force changes in the post-polio syndrome. In: Halstead, L.S. & Wiechers, D. (Eds.) Research and Clinical Aspects of the Late Effects of Poliomyelitis. New York: March of Dimes, Birth Defects Foundation. [PubMed Abstract]

Ramlow, J., Alexander, M. LaPorte, R., Kaufmann, C. Kuller, L. (1992). Epidemology of post-polio syndrome, American Journal of Epidemiology. 136, 769-786. [PubMed Abstract]

Trojan, D.A., Cashman, N.R., Shapiro, S., Tansey, C.M. & Esdaile, J.M. (1994). Predictive factors for post-poliomyeltis syndrome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 770-777. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

Trojan, D.A., Gendron, D. & Cashman, N.R. (1993). Anticholinesterase – responsive neuromuscular junction transmission defects in post-poliomyelitis fatigue. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 114, 170-177. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

Viney, L.L. & Manton, M. (1973). Sampling verbal behaviour in Australia, Australian Journal of Psychology, 25, 45-55.

Westbrook, M.T. (1991). A survey of post polio sequelae: Manifestations, effects on people’s lives and responses to treatment. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 37, 89-102.

Westbrook, M.T. (1994). Disability as a life course: Implications of early experiences for later coping. Paper presented at the Sixth Post-Polio and Independent Living Conference. St. Louis, U.S.A.

Westbrook, M.T. & Viney, L.L. (1977). The application of content analysis to life stress research. Australian Psychologist, 12, 157-166.

Tables

Table 1

CHARACTERISTICS OF POST-POLIO SAMPLE
 
Number   176
     
Age at follow up survey    
     
    Mean   57 years
     
Range   33-77 years
     
Age at onset of polio    
     
    Median   8 years
     
Range   0-35 years
     
Time spent in hospital at onset    
         
    None   13%
         
         

 

 

 

    1-6 months   32%
         
    7-12 months   19%
         
    over 1 year   35%
         
Initial severity of impairment

Klingman* Index of severity of polio

   
     
    6   18%
     
5   13%
     
4   14%
     
3   26%
     
2   20%
     
1   8%
 
*Klingman (1988) assigns one point for each limb involved, one for back and 1 for chest.

 

 

Table 2

MAJOR POST-POLIO SYMPTOMS: RESPONDENTS REPORTING NEW OR INCREASED SYMPTOMS OCCURRING IN THE 5 YEARS BETWEEN SURVEYS

Symptom Percentages with new/increased symptoms Muscle weakness 91%

Fatigue 91%

Muscle pain 80%

 

 

Table 3

POST-POLIO SYMPTOMS: INCREASE AND STABLISATION OVER 5 YEARS
 
SYMPTOM   OVER PAST 5 YEARS
 
New/increased   Stable   Not present
             
Joint pain   64%   23%   13%
             
Change in walking   60%   22%   18%
             
Sensitivity to cold   48%   34%   18%
             
Change in sleep patterns   39%   27%   34%
             
Tendency to fall   38%   27%   35%
             
Breathing difficulties   32%   13%   55%
             
             

 

 

 

Cramps   32%   35%   34%
             
Muscle atrophy   31%   33%   36%
             
Number or severity of headaches   29%   22%   49%
             
Muscle twitching   25%   30%   46%
             
Voice changes   22%   18%   60%
             
Swallowing difficulties   16%   18%   66%

 

 

Table 4

FEELINGS OF ANXIETY EXPRESSED NEAR ONSET OF POST POLIO SYMPTOMS AND FIVE YEARS LATER

t = 4.7, p < .001

Anxiety Scale (Gottschalk and Gleser, 1969)

(Scale scores references to death, mutilation, seperation, guilt, shame and diffuse anxiety)

 

 

Table 5

FEELINGS OF DEPRESSION EXPRESSED NEAR ONSET OF POST POLIO SYMPTOMS AND FIVE YEARS LATER

 

 

t = 4.4, p < .001

Hostility Directed Inward Scale (Gottschalk and Gleser, 1969) (Scale scores references to self blaming, discouragement, despair, self criticism, self deserving punishment, feelings of deprivation, disappointment, inability to meet expectations or others etc.)

 

 

Table 6

POLIO SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF THE HELPFULNESS OF TREATMENTS PROVIDED BY MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS

SPECIALITY RATINGS OF TREATMENT Very helpful Some help No help

General practice 32% 43% 25% Rehabilitation Medicine 56% 33% 11% Orthopaedics 25% 49% 26% Neurology 25% 49% 28% (Percentages derived from numbers consulting each speciality)

 

 

Table 7

POLIO SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF THE HELPFULNESS OF TREATMENTS PROVIDED

 

 

BY ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

PROFESSION   CLIENTS’ RATINGS OF TREATMENT
 
Very helpful   Some help   No help
             
Podiatrists   63%   33%   4%
             
Orthotists   58%   31%   11%
             
Chiropractors   51%   38%   10%
             
Physiotherapists   45%   38%   17%
             
Occupational therapists   45%   43%   12%
 
(Percentages derived from numbers consulting each profession)

 

 

Table 8

POLIO SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF EFFICACY OF TREATMENTS IN REDUCING POST POLIO SYMPTOMS

TREATMENT RATINGS OF TREATMENT Very helpful Some help No help

Massage 67% 33% 0% Hot baths 59% 39% 2% Special shoes 55% 41% 5% Swimming 47% 35% 18%

Hydrotherapy 43% 35% 22% Drugs for pain relief 33% 63% 4% Dietary changes 30% 63% 7% Water aerobics 29% 57% 14% Stress management course 28% 56% 17% Exercise program 25% 44% 31% Vitamins 25% 65% 10% Herbal remedies 19% 67% 14% (Percentages derived from numbers adopting each treatment)

 

 

Table 9

POLIO SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF EFFICACY OF LIFE STYLE CHANGES IN REDUCING

 

 

POST POLIO SYMPTOMS

CHANGE   RATINGS OF EFFICACY
 
Very helpful   Some help   No help
             
Employ household help   78%   22%   0%
             
Bought special furniture/equipment   71%   27%   2%
             
Modify home   70%   30%   0%
             
Pace self   62%   37%   2%
             
Planned life more efficiently   60%   40%   0%
             
Rest more   54%   44%   1%
             
Get family to help more   52%   43%   4%
             
Reduce physical activity   52%   48%   1%
 
(Percentages derived from numbers adopting each change)

 

 

Changes in Post-Polio Survivors Over Five Years Read More »

Survival Strategies

THE HASSLES OF LIVING WITH POST-POLIO: SOME SURVIVAL STRATEGIES

Mary T. Westbrook, PhD

Paper presented at the Polio Consumers Forum, 12th World Congress of the International Federation of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sydney, March 1995

Lincolnshire Post-Polio Library copy by kind permission of the author

Mary T. Westbrook, PhD

Associate Professor

Department of Behavioural Sciences

Faculty of Health Sciences

The University of Sydney

I don’t need to elaborate on the hassles of living with post-polio syndrome to most of this audience. As Lorenzo Milam (15) a polio survivor wrote:

When (polio) first picks us up and throws us down, we think that we can beat it. Learn to walk; do it gracefully, so no one will know what little we have. Become independent: how do they say it? ‘I’ll be my own man’. They never tell us about Phase Two: when the ageing nerves begin to weaken. What we learned to do so smartly after the fire had passed over us, we watch disappear again. Our victories last for … thirty years – and then the referee comes up to us, blows the whistle, and tells us that we’re out, after all. What we gained, we lose (p. 59).

As for coping with the problems of post-polio, while the experts such as doctors and therapists can give valuable advice, the true experts are polio survivors themselves. They have tried a wide range of strategies in their own lives and know from experience how helpful these are (or are not) in reducing the physical symptoms and emotional upsets of having post-polio syndrome.

COPING STRATEGIES OF SURVIVORS

In 1988 I surveyed over 300 polio survivors (24) I asked them to describe the treatments that had helped or not helped, reduce their symptoms, changes they had made in their lifestyles in their attempts to cope with post-polio, and the advice they would give to someone who developed post-polio symptoms. Those answers yielded a wide range of coping strategies.

Five years later (25) I followed up those respondents who had post-polio syndrome. (These people were identified using the criteria developed by American researchers (19) which have been shown to be a valid way of detecting people whom physicians diagnose as having the syndrome). Of the 217 people who were mailed a follow-up questionnaire 176 (81%) completed them. The second survey questionnaire systematically listed the numerous coping strategies that respondents had identified previously and asked survivors whether they had used each strategy. If they had adopted it, they were asked to rate it as ‘very helpful’, ‘some help’ or ‘no help’ in relieving physical symptoms or reducing the personal problems of postpolio.

Treatments that Relieve Symptoms

The treatments most frequently tried by survivors are listed in Table 1. (This paper does not consider treatments specifically linked to consulting a member of a health profession eg physiotherapy, chiropractic or a visit to a post polio clinic. These treatments were included in the survey andare discussed elsewhere (25)). In some instances treatments were prescribed by a health practitioner, in other cases they were self prescribed or suggested by a friend. The figures in the brackets beside each treatment listed in the table, indicate how many people in the survey tried each treatment. So while approximately a third or more had taken drugs for pain relief and undertaken swimming or exercise programs, relatively few had tried yoga, counselling or relaxation courses. The treatments are arranged in order from those receiving the most ratings of ‘very helpful’ in providing symptom relief (massage, hot baths, special shoes, swimming and hydrotherapy), to those receiving the fewest (herbal remedies).

As Table 1 shows, certain forms of treatment provided at least some symptom relief to virtually everyone who adopted them viz massage, hot baths, counselling, drugs for pain relief and special shoes. The figures in the ‘No help’ column also indicate that some treatments were found by a relatively large number of users to provide no symptom relief. This was particularly so for exercise programs. Exercise remains a controversial form of treatment for post-polio syndrome (5, 12). Recently Halstead (10) has developed a five level, limb-specific classification system of polio limbs. On the basis of this classification, recommendations are made as to what, if any, type of exercise program should be undertaken.

Life Style Changes that Reduce Symptoms

Table 2 lists the major life style changes survivors have adopted in their attempts to relieve post-polio symptoms. Comparison of the figures in the brackets in Tables 1 and 2 (which show the percentage of respondents using each strategy) indicates that respondents were more likely to have made life style changes than to have tried the treatments listed in Table 1. Every change was adopted by almost a third or more of the group. Almost two thirds or more reported that they now rested more (78%), had reduced their physical activity (69%) and paced themselves (64%). The results show that life style changes tended to be found more helpful in reducing symptoms than most of the treatments listed in Table 1. For example, employing household help, buying special furniture and equipment and making home modifications were found to be very helpful by 70% or more of those who used these strategies. The results also show that all life style changes that were made provided some symptom relief to virtually everyone who adopted them. As the ‘no help’ column shows, only between 0-2 % of survivors reported that they received no benefits from these changes.

Personal and Social Strategies that Help

Beatrice Wright (26) in her classic book on the psychosocial aspects of living with disability identified a

shift in values as a helpful strategy for coping. She found that as well as mourning what they have lost, people who cope more effectively with disability begin to shift their interests and involvement to those aspects of life not closed to them. The survey findings listed in Table 3 show this is what many polio survivors have done and the great majority of those who used such strategies reported that they helped. For example, 75 % increased their involvement in interests they can still pursue (and only 4% said this was of no help), 72% developed new interests and leisure pursuits, and 65% found more creative ways to use the time they spent alone or resting. Many found that acquiring information about post-polio helped them to cope; 90% read more about post-polio and 89% subscribed to a post-polio newsletter. Only 2% reported they received no help from this reading. Others found that strategies of personal development such as developing their philosophy of life, or becoming a more spiritual person, were effective coping strategies.

It is interesting that while most of the personal strategies adopted were relatively effective (over half the people that used any of them rated them as ‘very helpful’ and very few users rated them as being of ‘no help’) the social or interpersonal strategies that were adopted proved more problematic. The social strategies described as most helpful were: asking friends of family members for help (55% and 52% respectively found these to be ‘very helpful’ but only 39% of respondents had ever asked a family member to help and 19% had asked a friend to do so). People were much more likely to say they had talked with their family (75%) or friends (74%) about post-polio problems but these activities received the lowest helpfulness ratings of any strategies (apart from some treatments). Forty percent of respondents found it very helpful to talk to family members and 23 % said friends were very helpful. For 17-18% of respondents these communications were of no help.

Implications of Findings on Coping

The findings of the survey show that polio survivors are using a wide range of strategies to cope with post-polio symptoms and problems. Many of the strategies that they rated as ‘most helpful’ involved making changes in their lives both at a practical and personal level. These were effective in helping people cope as was demonstrated by other findings from the research. In the five years between the two surveys, although the physical symptoms of most survivors in the group worsened, people became significantly less anxious and depressed about their health (25).

One of the messages that the findings have for polio survivors is that we need to realise our own abilities to cope, and to live creatively with our disability despite the fact that its causes and cure are yet unclear (12). Kat Duff (17) who had chronic fatigue syndrome wrote:

When pain and disability prove intractable… we feel betrayed by the promises of cures that can be found in almost every magazine, and forsaken by doctors, family and friends who cannot really help but keep suggesting another treatment. A man with debilitating diabetes finally told his doctor, ‘In the long run, I’ll go down this road myself. Neither you nor anyone else can prevent it or control it or understand it for me’(p. 38).

Similarly there is no complete cure for post-polio syndrome although health practitioners can provide treatments that reduce symptoms and prevent, or at least slow down, further decline. The experiences reported by the survivors in the survey reveal that they have broadened their perspective to include other strategies besides medical treatments as ways of coping with their increasing disability. What they found was that there was much they themselves could do at a life style and personal level that reduced symptoms and feelings of unhappiness.

THE NEED FOR SOCIAL SUPPORT

The responses of survivors to the survey questions concerning social support are of concern. The results show that many respondents are reluctant to ask for practical support from others. When they tried to talk with their families or friends the results were less than optimal. Even among those who talked about post polio with another polio survivor only 43 % said it was very helpful. Thus quite a number of survivors lack helpful social support of either a practical or emotional nature.

This is of concern as much research has shown that the support of family and friends can significantly reduce the stress people experience in difficult life situations such as illness (9). Campbell (4) found that family support had a very significant buffering effect for women with more severe post-polio syndrome. They were much less depressed and were more accepting of their disability than their counterparts who had little social support.

Interference from the Past

Answers that respondents gave to other questions in the survey suggest some of the reasons why many polio survivors find it particularly difficult to obtain support from others. The survey asked survivors to write an account of their early memories of when they contracted polio. For most, the initial experience with polio involved separation from their families for extremely long periods with very limited visiting. They suffered from paralysis, pain and frightening procedures and equipment, while being cared for by

distant and sometimes abusive staff. Respondents often described experiences similar to those of Deborah McKeen (14).

When I was five, I got polio. Numerous experiences with doctors, nurses and therapists gnaw at me… Because I had wet my bed I was paraded through a boys’ ward wearing a diaper with a bow attached… A nurse made me stay in a particularly painful position because I talked back to her. I can’t begin to count the number of times I was left naked, unable to cover myself, on view to anyone walking by. In an iron lung, I remember crying for my mother. The nurse punished my tears by turning the mirror so that I could see nothing but the holes in the ceiling and told me not to be a baby. I was a baby; I was five years old. I didn’t talk about these experiences to anyone. When I let myself think about them, I felt humiliated, embarrassed, frightened and dirty. It wasn’t until I was an adult and in therapy that I came to understand that what I had gone through was not medical care but medical abuse. Silence was the way I avoided confronting my pain. I had done nothing that warranted that sort of treatment; by holding it inside I was not allowing myself to feel the anger I had for being treated so abominably (p. 43).

Such ‘care’ of sick and disabled children was common until well past the mid-century (11) when the work of John Bowlby (2) alerted people to the long term harmful effects of separating children from their families.

Survivors’ written memories indicated that difficulties often continued after their return home from hospital. Negative attitudes toward people with disabilities were more prevalent than today. They were experienced primarily as exclusions that echoed earlier abandonment e.g. parties people weren’t asked to, friends who dropped away, venues that excluded or exhausted them, devaluing assumptions people made about them. Some people experienced overt rejection eg teasing and aggression from other children and occasionally even from their own families. Phillips (18) claims that modern western societies regard people with disabilities as damaged goods. As members of society, survivors tended to adopt its standards

and to agree that they did indeed fall short. Of course these painful and uncomfortable feelings were rarely acknowledged but they spurred survivors on to become super-achievers. Our mental equation seemed to be that if we were better than average in everything we could do this would cancel out the deficiency of our disability.

Leaving rehabilitation also meant that most survivors lost contact with each other so there was no one in their social group who had had experiences similar to their own and with whom they could talk. Also as Duff (7) pointed out there is a strong social taboo about talking about your disability. People may become uncomfortable because its makes them aware of their own vulnerability or presents them with a problem that is difficult, or often impossible, to solve.

Wright (26) has compared being disabled with membership of other minority groups. However, unlike members of most minority groups a person with a disability is usually the only member of his or her social circle who has a disability. Not only does no one fully appreciate your experiences but they cannot give you useful advice on how to cope. Furthermore, for most minority groups although members’ characteristics may not be valued by the wider society they are valued within the person’s immediate circle. Thus a Black person in a racist community typically has a family who share his/her experiences, can give him/her tips on how to cope and will instil pride in racial identity. No one ever told us that disabled was beautiful.

Asper (1) has described how such emotional abandonment in youth shapes the adult personality. She has found that as adults such people typically:

– Fail to acknowledge the degree of their early abandonment and suffering

– Fear later abandonment

– Are out of touch with their feelings

– Display false self sufficiency

– Demand impossible standards from themselves

– Feel excessive shame

– Respond to others’ needs but have little idea of what is good for themselves

– Are unable to ask for, or accept, help as they fear repetition of their early experiences – Lack compassion for themselves

Bruno and Frick (3) have found that many of these characteristics typify polio survivors. Such feelings of shame and fears of abandonment and negative responses from others seem to be important contributory causes of the fact that many survivors are not utilising their social networks to obtain support, particularly to obtain practical help. Those that do seek social support usually achieve less than optimal outcomes. It seems that survivors need to develop skills to increase the social support in their lives and enhance outcomes when they do seek support.

There are no simple answers as to how we can achieve this. Asper (1) argued that survivors of youthful abandonment need to face the pain of their earlier experiences. Although this can be very upsetting initially, she has found that it leads people to develop empathy with themselves, it increases their confidence in themselves and their joy in living. Some people have found counselling a helpful support in facing their past. Talking with an empathic and non-judgemental friend may be helpful although many people find it difficult to listen to and support a person who is very distressed.

Small support groups of polio survivors could provide opportunities to discuss the past. One of the most

positively received sessions at the Sixth International Conference on Post-Polio and Independent Living that I attended in St. Louis last year was a workshop entitled, ‘Polio history: Our stories must be told’. People recounted both negative and positive experiences. Empathising with others’ experiences made many acknowledge, for the first time, that their own experiences, which were similar to those of the speakers, were also worthy of empathy. Observing others’ courage led them to acknowledge their own.

If you lack a suitable confidant, then writing down your experiences (but not just thinking them over) has been shown to be a helpful way of reducing the distress associated with the past and providing insight into ways in which the past is interfering with finding solutions to present problems (17). Self help books such as those by Wheeler and Dace-Lombard (23) and Dowrick (6) may also be useful support tools.

Any revival of past memories is initially likely to arouse feelings such as distress and anger. Gradually however the past is placed in perspective. We understand that the ways we coped when we first got polio are not the best ways to cope with post-polio. We are now adults, with knowledge, power and resources that we lacked as children or young adults and the world has also changed since then. Attitudes toward people with disabilities are less negative and the majority of health practitioners have been educated to be at least somewhat more understanding of patients’ psychological and social needs than were many of the staff recalled in survivors’ accounts.

Developing Practical Skills

At a practical level we need to explore strategies for telling others about our needs and feelings in ways that lead to positive outcomes and do not diminish our feelings of selfworth. There is a dearth of ‘How-to be disabled’ books. Fullwood and Cronin (8) have written an excellent book called ‘Facing the Crowd’ which provides parents of children with disabilities with numerous practical strategies for coping with the ignorance, insensitivities and anxieties of the ablebodied. Many of their ideas are applicable to adults with disabilities and could be a useful basis for discussion in the context of support groups. One strategy that they discuss is ways of taking the initiative to shape other people’s responses. For example, friends may feel uncomfortable or uncertain when encountering your increasing disability. Often briefly mentioning what is happening, or asking for help, (eg ‘I find it difficult doing this now. I wonder if you’ll mind giving me a hand?’) will put the other person at ease and prevent the situation developing in ways that may upset you (eg feeling your friend wasn’t interested enough to ask about your health or didn’t care enough to bother helping you).

Other strategies that Fulwood and Cronin discuss include:

– Managing cliches (how to react to irritating statements and generalisations people make such as ‘God has chosen you for this special burden’, ‘I think you’re marvellous, I don’t know how you manage’, ‘Just look at Roosevelt and Marjorie Lawrence. People with polio have all had wonderful lives and have given the world so much’). Some of the strategies suggested for coping with cliches include: a) Developing short ‘pat’ answers that can be delivered in a light humourous fashion (eg ‘Yes I am pretty wonderful. I don’t know how I do it either’,’God has chosen me? I wish he’d asked me first’); b) Nonaggressively repeating the statement back in question form so that the speaker can reflect on its appropriateness (eg ‘Do you really think I’m marvellous? What would you have done?’) c) Make a statement of feeling or fact (eg In response to ‘I think you’re marvellous. I don’t know how you do it’ say ‘I don’t know either. I do know the going is very tough sometimes’) d) Decide to ignore what was said after evaluating the situation.

– Being assertive (eg Outlining the dilemma so people have a complete understanding of your problem; providing the ground rules eg family members will need to take turns in taking over a task you can no

longer manage).

– Knowing your own thresholds (eg when you’re fatigued it may be sensible not to visit a critical relative).

– Developing strategies for coping with difficult people (eg self talk, mental rehearsal, tension release).

Overall the aim of the book is to help people respond in social situations in ways that increase their own and other people’s satisfaction with the interaction. A support group of polio survivors could ‘brainstorm’ and list social situations members find difficult or upsetting. Then strategies such as those that Fulwood and Cronin suggest could be considered and applied to the problems. Discussion in support groups could

also examine the values that underlie much self-defeating behaviour particularly the over-valuation of independence and control which seem to be legacies of polio rehabilitation (3). Trieschmann (22) has identified these values as a major hindrance to ageing with dignity and self-esteem in western societies.

Developing Pride

Finally, learning about the Disability Rights movement (16,21) can help us to understand the meaning of our past and begin to take pride in what people with disabilities have achieved. Polio survivors were the first major group of people with disabilities to be integrated in western society and many have been active participants in the Independent Living and Disabled Rights Movements. Jenny Morris’s book (16) has been described as ‘a celebration of our strength and a part of our taking pride in ourselves, a pride which incorporates our disability and values it’ (p. 14). That is why I prefer the term polio survivor to terms such as polio victim or sufferer or disabled by polio. As Rosen (20) wrote in Disability Rag, ‘disabled’ is a negative term:

You cannot get away from the fact that ‘disabled’ means ‘not able’. There is no other meaning. ‘Survivor’ is a real word. It is not negative; it always conveys a sense of wholeness, of skill in just those ways we have had to be skilful. And it defines us both socially and politically within the framework we have had to live all these years. We have survived medically, morally, politically and economically. Those of us who are involved in the struggle to end our oppression are, simply, survivors (p. 8).

And as we continue to survive we are discovering new and different strengths which are celebrated in this poem by Lois Keith (13) who became a wheelchair rider (not wheelchair bound or confined to a wheelchair) as many polio survivors have become.

Tomorrow I am going to rewrite the English Language.

I will discard all those striving ambulist metaphors

of power and success

And construct new ways to describe my strength.

My new, different strength.

Then I won’t have to feel dependent

Because I can’t stand on my own two feet.

And I’ll refuse to feel a failure

When I don’t stay one step ahead.

I won’t feel inadequate if I can’t

Stand up for myself

Or illogical when I don’t

Take it one step at a time.

I will make them understand that it is a very male way

To describe the world.

All this walking tall

And making great strides.

Yes, tomorrow I am going to rewrite the English Language

Creating the world in my own image.

Mine will be a gentler, more womanly way

To describe my progress.

I will wheel, cover and encircle.

Somehow I will learn to say it all.

REFERENCES

  1. Asper, K. (1993). The abandoned child within: On losing and regaining self-worth. New York. From International Publishing.
  2. Bowlby, J. (1966). Child care and the growth of love. London: Penguin.
  3. Bruno, R.L. & Frick, N.M. (1991). The psychology of polio as prelude to post-polio sequelae: Behaviour modification and psychotherapy. Orthopedics, 14, 1185-1193. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]
  4. Campbell, M. (1994). Later life effects of early life disability.·Comparisons of age-matched controls of indicators of physical, psychological and social status. California, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, University of Southern California.
  5. Dean, E., Ross, J. & McIntyre, D. (1989). A rejoinder to ‘Exercise programs for post-polio syndrome: A case report’. Physical Therapy, 69, 695-699. [PubMed Abstract]
  6. Dowrick, S. (1993). The intimacy and solitude self-therapy book. Melbourne: Mandarin. 7. Duff, K. (1994). The alchemy of illness. London: Virago.
  7. Fulwood, D. & Cronin, P. (1986). Facing the crowd. Burwood, Victoria: Royal Institute for the Blind.
  8. Friedman, H.S. & Di Matteo, M.R. (1989). Health psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 10. Halstead, L.S. (1993). NRH limb classification for exercise prescription in post-polio patients. In F. Lonnberg (Ed.). Proceedings of the Copenhagen Post-Polio Conference, Denmark. 11. Humphries, S. & Gordon, P. (1992). Out of sight. The experience of disability 1900-1950. London: Northcote House.
  9. Jubelt, B. & Drucker, J. (1993). Post-polio syndrome: An update. Seminars in Neurology, 13, 283- 290. [PubMed Abstract]
  10. Keith, L. (1994). Tomorrow I’m going to rewrite the English language. In L. Kejth (Ed.). Mustn’t grumble.·Writing by disabled woman. London: Women’s Press.
  11. McKeen, D.G. (1992). Such a good little patient. Disability Rag, July, 43.
  12. Milam, L.W. (1984). The cripple liberation front marching band blues. San Diego: MHO & MHO Works.
  13. Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice. London, The Women’s Press.
  14. Pennebaker, J. (1990). Opening up: The healing power of confiding in others. New York: Avon Books.
  15. Phillips, M. (1990). Damaged goods: Oral narratives of the experience of disability in American culture. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 849-857. [PubMed Abstract]
  16. Ramlow, J., Alexander, M., LaPorte, R., Kaufmann, C. & Kuller, L. (1992). Epidemiology of post polio syndrome, American Journal of Epidemiology. 136, 769 786. [PubMed Abstract] 20. Rosen, S.L. (1983). I call myself a survivor. Disability Rag, May, 8.
  17. Shapiro, J. (1993). No pity. People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Random House.
  18. Trieschmann, R. (1972). Aging with dignity and control. New Mobility, 47.
  19. Wheeler, E.G. & Dace-Lombard, J. (1989). Living creatively with chronic illness. Developing skills for transcending the loss, pain and frustration. California: Pathfinder Publishing. 24. Westbrook, M.T. (1991). A survey of post polio sequelae: Manifestations, effects on people’s lives and responses to treatment. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 37, 89-102.
  20. Westbrook, M.T. (1995). Changes in post-polio survivors over five years: Symptoms and reactions to treatment. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress, International Federation of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sydney.
  21. Wright, B. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach. New York: Harper and Row. Tables
Table 1 SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF HELPFULNESS OF TREATMENTS IN RELIEVING POST-POLIO SYMPTOMS
TREATMENT¹ RATINGS OF TREATMENT²
  Very Helpful No Help
Massage (29%) 67% 0%
Hot baths (28%) 59% 2%
Special shoes (25%) 55% 5%
Swimming (31%) 47% 18%
Hydrotherapy (26%) 43% 22%
Counselling (8%) 36% 1%
Yoga (5%) 33% 11%
Drugs for pain relief (45%) 33% 4%
Dietary changes

(26%)

30% 7%
Water aerobics (12%) 29% 14%
Stress management course (10%) 28% 17%
Exercise program (31%) 25% 31%
Vitamins (29%) 25% 10%
Relaxation course (9%) 23% 12%
     
 

 

 

Herbal remedies

(12%)

19% 14%
¹ Percentages of the 176 survivors who had adopted each treatment are shown in brackets. ² Survivors who had used each treatment rated whether they found it ‘very helpful’, ‘some help’ or ‘no help’ in relieving symptoms. Percentages rating a treatment ‘some help’ can be calculated by subtracting ‘very helpful’ and ‘no help’ percentages from 100 eg 33 % found massage was ‘some help’.

 

 

Table 2 SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF HELPFULNESS OF LIFE STYLE CHANGES IN RELIEVING POST-POLIO SYMPTOMS
CHANGE MADE¹ RATINGS OF EFFICACY²
  Very Helpful No Help
Employ household help (31%) 78% 0%
Bought special

furniture/equipment (31%)

71% 2%
Modify home (31%) 70% 0%
Pace self (64%) 62% 2%
Planned life more

efficiently (53%)

60% 0%
Rest more (78%) 54% 1%
Reduce physical activity (69%) 52% 1%
¹ Percentages of the 176 survivors who had adopted each change are shown in brackets. ² Survivors who adopted each change rated whether they found it ‘very helpful’, ‘some help’ or ‘no help’ in relieving symptoms.

 

 

Table 3 SURVIVORS’ RATINGS OF THE HELPFULNESS OF PERSONAL AND SOCIAL STRATEGIES IN COPING WITH POST-POLIO PROBLEMS
STRATEGY USED¹ RATINGS OF HELPFULNESS²
  Very Helpful No Help
Become more involved in interests I can still pursue (75%) 65% 4%
Developed my philosophy of life (65%) 63% 4%
Read more about post-polio (90%) 60% 2%
     

 

 

Become a more spiritual person (developed my inner life) (62%) 58% 12%
Subscribed to a post-polio newsletter (89%) 56% 2%
Asked friends to help (19%) 55% 3%
Asked family to help (39%) 52% 4%
Used times I’m resting or alone more creatively (65%) 51% 9%
Developed new interests and leisure pursuits (72%) 50% 7%
Joined a post-polio support group (65%) 44% 11%
Talked about post-polio with other people who have had polio (68%) 43% 7%
Talked with my family about post-polio (75%) 40% 17%
Talked with my friends about post-polio (74%) 23% 18%
¹ Percentages of 176 survivors who had used each strategy shown in brackets.

² Survivors who had used each strategy rated whether they found it ‘very helpful’, ‘some help’ or ‘no help’ in coping with post-polio problems.

 

Survival Strategies Read More »

An Approach to the Patient with Suspected Post Polio Syndrome

AN APPROACH TO THE PATIENT

WITH SUSPECTED

POST POLIO SYNDROME

Originally written by Dr. Warren Anderson

and the Medical Advisory Board

of the Post Polio Program

Easter Seal Society of Oregon

MEDICAL ADVISORY BOARD

of the

POLIO OUTREACH ADVISORY COUNCIL

A Working Advisory Council to the Easter Seal Society of Washington

Joshua Benditt, MD, Pulmonologist Bill Kelly, Physical Therapist Evan Cantini, MD, Physiatrist Dennis Lang, RN, MPH, Polio Survivor Dianna Chamblin, MD, Physiatrist Lawrence R. Robinson, MD, Physiatrist Margarette Forgette, MD, Physiatrist Mark Sumi, MD, Neurologist

EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON

521 Second Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98119

March 1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Introduction
  2. Definition of Post Polio Syndrome
  3. Scope of the Problem
  4. Diagnostic Criteria
  5. Pathology: Physiologic and Clinical Consequences
  6. Extensive Neuronal Involvement in the Average Case
  7. Motor Unit Remodeling
  8. Decompensation Then Produces Post Polio Syndrome

III. Patient Presentation

  1. Prime Symptoms
  2. Additional Presenting Symptoms
  3. Past History
  4. Evaluation Process
  5. Identify Areas of Dysfunction
  6. Formalize Treatment Goals
  7. Prognosis
  8. Resources in Patient Management
  9. Neurology Consultation
  10. Physiatry (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)
  11. Physical Therapy
  12. Occupational Therapy
  13. Speech Pathology
  14. Pulmonology
  15. Psychology
  16. Support Groups
  17. Other
  18. Bibliography

AN APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH

SUSPECTED POST POLIO SYNDROME

Polio survivors are at risk for the occurrence of certain physiologic changes in the nervous system which result in a characteristic set of symptoms now known as Post Polio Syndrome. In addition to these unexpected physiological changes there are anticipated complications such as arthritis, scoliosis, and entrapment syndromes that frequently accompany paralytic conditions. These anticipated complications are not the problems that distinguish PPS from other diseases of the nervous system. Post Polio Syndrome (PPS) is a major chronic illness and one which poses unique problems to its survivors and their physicians.

No Diagnostic test exists for PPS, so clinical criteria must be used to establish the diagnosis. Many Physicians lack training in the diagnosis and management of a syndrome only recently acknowledged as existing. Patients are often uncomfortable with physicians they feel do not understand their problems. They also fear increased disability, often at the same time they are coping with limitations of aging. Patients are often trapped in a “conquer the disease” mentality derived from the experience of recovering from the acute episode an average of 25 years earlier. This is incompatible with the lifestyle adjustments necessary for optimal results in PPS rehabilitation.

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. DEFINITION OF POST POLIO SYNDROME

An otherwise unexplained constellation of symptoms which may include weakness, fatigue, pain, heat or cold intolerance, and swallowing, breathing, or sleep disturbance developing in a patient who had paralytic polio. Post Polio Muscle Atrophy (PPMA) has been used as the label for the above symptoms when they include progressive muscle atrophy.

  1. SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM

1987 National Health Interview Survey estimated 1.63 million American polio survivors (=0.625% of population), 50% with some Post Polio Syndrome symptoms.

  1. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
  2. PPS is a diagnosis of exclusion and should be based on a thorough history and physical exam. 2. Evidence of prior paralytic polio: via EMG, an appropriate history, or characteristic residual atrophy.
  3. Period of apparent stability before any new symptoms. New symptoms may often be seen after an illness or injury.
  4. Exclusion of other conditions (especially motor neuron diseases and overuse syndromes). II. PATHOLOGY: PHYSIOLOGIC AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES A. EXTENSIVE NEURONAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE ACUTE POLIO INFECTION
  5. The extent of central nervous system infection by polio virus is not well appreciated. Infection is far more widespread than anterior horn cells alone. Often anterior horn cell infection is largely

subclinical due to residual capacity of uninfected and surviving neurons. Infection outside the anterior horns is likely to be largely subclinical also, but may help to explain the disabling symptoms of fatigue and pain which are subjective and controversial (because the physiologic basis is uncertain).

  1. Ninety-five percent (95%) of motor neurons are infected in an average acute infection, with a 50% neuronal fatality rate.
  2. There is frequent segmental involvement, accounting for the lack of symmetry of weakness. 4. In addition to the anterior horns in the spinal cord, infection involves intermediolateral horns and dorsal root ganglia.
  3. Infection also involves motor cortex, hypothalamus, and globus pallidus, brainstem nuclei, reticular formation, cerebellar roof nuclei, and vermis.
  4. MOTOR UNIT REMODELING IN THE POST RECOVERY PHASE
  5. A normal quadriceps has, on average, 200 muscle fibers/anterior horn cell and a normal anterior horn cell can adopt as many as 1,000 orphaned muscle fibers.
  6. Over 50 % of motor units may be lost without symptoms. (Normal walking uses only 15-20% of maximum muscle strength.)
  7. Clinical improvement occurs acutely through recovery of mildly affected neurons, collateral sprouting, and strengthening (hypertrophy) of intact musculature.
  8. Increased demand on surviving motor units results in increased firing frequency which in turn produces a change in fiber type to predominantly aerobic “slow twitch” fibers with increased vascularity.
  9. DECOMPENSATION THEN PRODUCES POST POLIO SYNDROME While a single underlying etiology for PPS has not been proven, several theories exist:
  10. There is an increased metabolic burden on surviving anterior horn cells (even in asymptomatic muscles) as they direct more muscle fibers to contract, more often, to achieve the same force of contraction. This leads to anterior horn cell fatigue and can lead to premature metabolic injury, perhaps even cell loss. Fatigued neurons may be unable to continue to trophically support as many muscle fibers. The collateral sprouts to some muscle fibers will degenerate. The strength of these muscle fibers will be lost to the motor unit, and a spiral of decline may set in. This mode of decompensation augured by fatigue, may be anterior horn cell based. This appears not to be a static process and there may be dynamic denervation and reinervation.
  11. Another mode of decompensation is muscle fiber based: Rapidly firing muscle fibers produce more lactic acid which may not be adequately dissipated. This is especially true with any degree of isometric contraction. Muscle fiber fatigue may, lead to muscle fiber injury, lost function, and a spiral of decline.
  12. Any increase in mechanical load (such as would result from increased weight or increased physical activity) or decrease in force generating capacity (such as would result from inactivity following illness or injury) may trigger metabolic failure in motor units or in muscle fibers functioning close to their capacity.
  13. The resulting relative weakness may lead to joint and muscle misuse and overuse. This may lead in turn to both arthritis and overuse syndromes.
  14. In addition to anterior horn cell and muscle fiber modes of fatigue, central fatigue may also be a factor. Polio virus infection of the motor strip and the reticular activating system is well described.

A working definition for central fatigue is: “Increased mental effort necessary to perform a fixed amount of muscle contraction”. This is very much how Post Polio Syndrome patients describe their feelings of fatigue, many report hitting a “post polio wall”.

III. PATIENT PRESENTATION

  1. PRIME SYMPTOMS

A common presentation is a polio survivor who previously had lower extremity involvement in a well defined polio episode. The patient may have restricted ambulation from hiking or jogging, lived a sedentary life, and did not feel disabled. After a period of relatively stability he or she may begin to notice unusual fatigue and discomfort and may further restrict activity. Denial of decreased functional capacity may lead to a crisis as the patient can no longer can meet occupational, social, and family commitments. Persistence and attempts to continue at a previous activity level may lead to a downward spiral of decreasing functional capacity with resulting depression and despair. On examination, relative obesity may be present and weakness is easily demonstrated, often in the “good” leg; limbs considered unaffected are often subclinically affected with polio and may present with “new” polio. A statistical summary of the clinical characteristics of several series of PPS patients is as follows:

  1. Fatigue, Pain, and Weakness are almost always present. Fatigue (89%); Pain in Muscle or Joint (86%); New weakness (83%) in previously symptomatic (69%) or asymptomatic (50%) muscles. 2. New Atrophy (28%); This equates to Post Polio Muscular Atrophy (PPMA). 3. Activities of daily living difficulties (78%) = functional loss. Walking (64%); Climbing Stairs (61%); Dressing (17%).
  2. ADDITIONAL PRESENTING PROBLEMS
  3. Pulmonary dysfunction:

Patients with Post Polio Syndrome may suffer from weakness of the breathing muscles, namely the diaphragm and ribcage. Occasionally, this can be severe enough to cause symptoms of dyspnea on exertion and even at rest, poor clearance of respiratory secretions increasing the risk of pneumonia, and elevations in the resting arterial CO2 level. Measurement of pulmonary function tests in these

patients usually shows a significant restrictive pattern (small lung volumes) on the basis on neuromuscular weakness.

If respiratory muscle weakness is severe enough mechanical ventilation may be required. Small mechanical ventilators have been developed which deliver breaths through a comfortable plastic nose mask. This is often performed while the patient is asleep at night and results in improved daytime function.

  1. Sleep Disorders:

Patients with Post Polio Syndrome have a high incidence of sleep disturbances with poor sleep quality and frequent awakenings which may be due to several factors. However, the most important etiology to rule out is central, obstructive and mixed sleep apneas. Nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercarbia can lead to worsening of daytime function of the breathing muscles. Nocturnal non invasive ventilation can be used in these patients to improve sleep quality and reduce symptoms of daytime sleepiness, and perhaps improve daytime respiratory muscle function.

  1. Dysphagia:

Many PPS patients reported some new difficulty with eating or swallowing more commonly in those with bulbar polio. Video fluoroscopy has been used for evaluation and has frequently revealed pharyngeal constrictor weakness. Laryngeal penetration and loss of the cough reflex may occur without symptoms, suggesting an underestimation of the presence and severity of dysphagia in this population. Many patients have already employed compensation such as altering diet, cutting solids into small pieces, chewing it thoroughly, taking small sips of liquids, eating slowly, and using postural maneuvers. Most patients with dysphagia had also experienced some progressive speech difficulty such as increased hoarseness, weakness, or slurring.

  1. Cold intolerance (29%):

Limbs may be cold and cold exposure produces weakness. This is thought to be due to intermediolateral column involvement resulting is vasoparesis, venous pooling, and excessive heat loss.

  1. Degenerative arthritis:

A joint that is biomechanically disadvantaged may develop degenerative arthritis. 6. Social and psychological problems:

Long term disability and denial may result in social and psychological problems. C. PAST HISTORY

  1. Average age of polio onset is 7 years. Median time to maximum recovery is 8 years. Median period of stable neurologic and functional status is 25 years. Median post polio symptom duration before patient presents for evaluation is 5 years.
  2. Variables associated with shorter interval to PPS: greater severity and greater age. 3. Initial symptoms are most frequent in the lower limb most affected in the acute illness. (Upper extremity weakness is easier to compensate for without overuse resulting.)
  3. The onset is usually insidious but is frequently precipitated by injury, illness, bed rest, or weight gain.
  4. EVALUATION PROCESS
  5. IDENTIFY AREAS OF DYSFUNCTION
  6. The history is especially useful in identifying fatigue, dysphagia, sleep disorders, and alteration in activities of daily living.
  7. The Neurologic exam will identify atrophy or weakness and verify that reflexes are not increased. Pay special attention to the “good” limb as significant weakness may be present of which the patient has never been aware. With leg muscles, functional tests must be used because manual testing may not detect quadriceps weakened to 30% of normal even though this is sufficient strength for routine daily activities. Seek a mechanical advantage in manual muscle testing: Test the triceps or quadriceps with the elbow or knee flexed more than 90 degrees. Test the psoas in the supine position.
  8. The general physical exam and biomechanical exam note obesity, joint deformity, overuse syndromes, and scoliosis.
  9. Electromyography may be requested when needed to document previous anterior horn cell disease (especially when the previous history of polio is in doubt). EMG can also be used to rule out other neuromuscular pathologies or to identify subclinically involved muscles.
  10. CK elevation may be seen in patients but may not correlate with progressive weakness. B. FORMALIZE TREATMENT GOALS

After the diagnosis of PPS is established, a patient conference is a convenient way to formalize treatment goals and begin patient education. These areas should be addressed:

  1. Lifestyle Modifications:

This item is the “sine qua non” of all attempts at successful management of PPS. At the time of formal diagnosis, patients are often desperate, yet imbued with a belief in their own ability to overcome their disability through the “no pain, no gain” approach. This approach may have served them very well after their acute attack of polio many years ago but is now actually self destructive. Persistence in this approach of “overcoming” illness has led to a spiral of deteriorating function and frequently a parallel decline in self worth. Patients must understand the concept of “living with” PPS in order to lead the fullest life possible. An understanding of the need for lifestyle modification is rarely achieved at the first visit and is often best reintroduced by a knowledgeable Occupational or Physical Therapist and reinforced and monitored at subsequent physician office visits.

  1. Increase Muscle Capacity:
  2. a) Muscular capacity can be increased by achieving increased strength or endurance. Strength can be increased through isometric exercise. However, muscles must be carefully selected for isometric exercises. Some muscles will already be functioning at their maximum. Exercise may actually have a deleterious effect by forcing these muscles beyond their metabolic capacity and producing injury.
  3. b) Endurance may be increased, susceptibility to fatigue decreased, and long term deterioration minimized through appropriate exercise supervised by a physical therapist experienced with post polio patients. Almost all patients have initial difficulties with exercise programs resulting from overdoing. They may also equate fatiguing daily activities (which challenge the weakest musculature and do not provide an effective aerobic training level) to exercise. This can be an instructive opportunity for the patient in understanding the “Lifestyle modification” and to experience its benefits. Goals in aerobic exercise are:
  4. Educate the patient to avoid potentially harmful exercise-induced fatigue. A reasonable approach would be to establish the level of peak performance by patient history. Then start at 50% of peak performance and slowly increase performance as tolerated.
  5. Select exercises which can create a training effect in the patient with weakened, atrophic musculature and overuse syndromes. Exercise intervals with intervening rests are necessary, just as is pacing of daily activities. A knowledgeable Physical Therapist can be crucial to this aspect of management.
  6. c) Muscle capacity can also be increased by bracing, orthotics, or other aids which extend, amplify or substitute for muscles.
  7. d) Pharmacologic treatment of fatigue: Some medications seem to raise the threshold for fatigue. These observations are, as yet, anecdotal and await confirmation from clinical trials.
  8. Amantadine: up to 100 mg BID as tolerated.
  9. Deprenyl: up to 5 mg BID as tolerated.
  10. Mestinon: up to 60 mg TID when careful monitoring is available.

Medications for the amelioration of fatigue must be understood as aids which can give a running start to the rehabilitation process. However, if they are perceived by the patient as a form of curative treatment, they will only forestall the day of reckoning.

  1. Decrease Muscle Load To Less Than Muscle Capacity:
  2. a) PACING of activity is the logical consequence of a successful LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION. Implementing of PACING requires that patients identify for each of the activities of daily living the length of time they may participate before experiencing fatigue. They must then break up their activities into smaller modules of time, each of which is of less duration than the time required to produce fatigue. A corollary concept to PACING is ENERGY BUDGETING which imagines that one has a fixed expenditure of energy for each day and that this sum should be “spent” on activities of the highest personal priority. (Exceeding this daily limit may be conceptualized as spending principle or acquiring debt but probably correlates to metabolic injury of the motor unit through

overuse.)

  1. b) Other means of decreasing muscle load are diet when overweight, use of orthotics to improve mechanical efficiency, use of wheelchairs or scooters to save energy expenditure, and treatment of chronic overuse syndromes.
  2. Treat Specific Complications:
  3. a) Attention to specific complications such as dysphagia, pulmonary dysfunction and sleep disturbances may require specific referrals. The goals of these referrals can be addressed with the patient at this first conference.
  4. b) Functional consequences also result from overuse syndromes which can lead to joint deformity. Physiatry consultation can be helpful here and orthopedic intervention is occasionally required. Evaluate need for orthotic prescriptions (i.e., splints, braces, AFO’s)
  5. c) Somatization, depression, anxiety, and self worth problems may occur as capacity decreases. Referral for counseling should be considered (MSW, psychologist) or polio support group (see reference section).
  6. d) Evaluate and/or modify work duties through referral to occupational therapist or vocational counselor.
  7. PROGNOSIS

Patients often present during a period of decompensation. Decompensation may be caused by even slight embarrassment in strength due to inactivity or injury superimposed upon aging. It may also result from slight increase in muscular work resulting from weight gain or increase in activities. In either case, a spiral

of deterioration may result from potential overuse injury to the motor unit and subsequent decrease in functional capacity can result. Patients may easily become fearful and depressed at this ominous decline in their previously stable, if compromised, neuromuscular status.

It is important to clarify for the patient the difference between deterioration in function and deterioration from disease progression. In fact, there is little evidence that any loss of function experienced by PPS patients is due to progression or recurrence of polio virus infection. If patients can understand that opposing forces of muscle strength versus muscle load are acting near a capacity threshold, they will be quicker to accept PACING concepts, to employ an appropriate exercise program, and to utilize other elements of rehabilitation. In most cases, this will allow the patient to return to or approach the previous functional baseline. It is not difficult for patients to then minimize deterioration in function over the years by:

  1. Achieving an optimal balance between muscle strength and endurance (achieved and maintained by exercise) versus muscle burden (resulting from body weight, mechanical inefficiencies, and activity level).
  2. Utilizing PACING and restriction of activities after the point of fatigue so that muscle work is kept within the limits of muscle capacity and decompensation does not occur.
  3. Gradually decreasing total daily energy expenditure over the years much as a non PPS individual might do. This rarely results in much loss of individual activities or functions, only in the amount of each that is performed each day.
  4. RESOURCES IN PATIENT MANAGEMENT

The patient with PPS is best served by having a physician who has experience evaluating post polio symptoms, formalizing treatment goals, and making the appropriate referrals such as those listed below:

  1. NEUROLOGY CONSULTATION

When the Diagnosis is in question.

  1. PHYSIATRY (PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION)

A Physiatrist is a physician with expertise in the orchestration of the rehabilitation process. Especially when disability is severe, complex, or when biomechanical problems are prominent, physiatry consultation can help with the initial planning and selection of specific exercise programs, physical therapy, orthotics, and adaptive equipment.

  1. PHYSICAL THERAPY

A Physical Therapist who is experienced regarding PPS will be of tremendous value in introducing and customizing the lifestyle modifications and in introducing the useful concepts of pacing and energy budgeting. Physical Therapists can also screen for inefficiency in movement resulting from deformity or weakness, assist in establishing your patient on a safe exercise program, and monitor for the almost inevitable initial over indulgence in that program.

  1. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY

Occupational Therapists are trained to assess the home environment and the patient’s daily activities in order to restructure tasks, introduce mechanical aids like grab bars, and provide devices such as sock lifters which make possible physical activities otherwise compromised by disability. Instruction in PACING of routine daily activities and associated lifestyle modification can also be provided by an Occupational Therapist.

  1. SPEECH PATHOLOGY

A speech pathologist can help in the evaluation and treatment of swallowing and speech problems. F. PULMONOLOGY

A Pulmonologist can evaluate and manage respiratory dysfunction and sleep dysfunction. G. PSYCHOLOGY

A psychologist or MSW can evaluate and counsel regarding reactive depression, coping strategies, pain management and life style adjustment. This is especially important to help the post-polio survivor deal with the “reemergence” of a neuromuscular disorder they thought had been previously conquered.

  1. SUPPORT GROUPS

Local education/support groups meet on a monthly basis in various locales, offering education, support, and social opportunities for polio survivors and their families.

  1. OTHER

Orthopedics, nutrition, and social work referrals for evaluation will occasionally be useful in specific circumstances.

  1. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Dalakas, et al. A Long Term Followup Study of Patients with Post Poliomyelitis Neuromuscular Symptoms. NEJM 1986;314:949-63. [PubMed Abstract]

Klingman, et al. Functional Recovery: A Major Risk Factor for the Development of PPMA. Arch Neurol ’88;45:645-7. [PubMed Abstract]

Pezeshkpour & Dalakas. Long Term Changes in the Spinal Cords of Patients with Old Polio. Arch Neurol ’88;45:505-8. [PubMed Abstract]

Sonies and Dalakas. Dysphagia in Patients with the Post-Polio Syndrome. NEJM 1991;324:1162-7. [PubMed Abstract]

Steljes, et al. Sleep in Postpolio Syndrome. Chest 1990;98:133-139. [PubMed Abstract]

Jones, et al. Cardiorespiratory Responses to Aerobic Training by Patients with Polio Sequelae. JAMA ’89;261:3255-8. [PubMed Abstract]

Agre, et al. Late Effects of Polio: Critical Review of the Literature on NM Fxn. Arch Phys Med Rehab ’91;72:923-31. [PubMed Abstract]

Munsat, ed. Post-Polio Syndrome. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990.

The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

Registered Charity No. 1064177

An Information Service for Polio Survivors and Medical Professionals

All enquiries, book requests, medical article requests, membership fees, items for newsletters and donations to

The Secretary, Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

PO Box 954, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN5 5ER United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0)1522 888601

Facsimile: +44 (0)870 1600840

Email: info@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

Web Site: www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network takes great care in the transcription of all information that appears at this site. However, we do not accept liability for any damage resulting directly or otherwise from any errors introduced in the transcription. Neither do we accept liability for any damage resulting directly or otherwise from the information available at this site. The opinions expressed in the documents available at this site are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily constitute endorsement or approval by the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network.

© Copyright The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

Copyright is retained by The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network and/or original author(s). Permission is granted to print copies of individual articles for personal use provided they are printed in their entirety. Links from other Internet WWW sites are welcome and encouraged. We only ask that you let us know so that we can in future notify you of critical changes. Reproduction and redistribution of any articles via any media, with the exception of the aforementioned, requires permission from The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network and where applicable, the original author(s).

Document preparation: Chris Salter, Original Think-tank, Cornwall, United Kingdom.

Document Reference: <URL:http://www.zynet.co.uk/ott/polio/lincolnshire/library/easterseal/approach.html>

Created: January 1997

Last modification: 24th January 2010.

An Approach to the Patient with Suspected Post Polio Syndrome Read More »

PPS Questions and Answers

PPS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, MARCH, 1995 by Drs Richard Bruno and Nancy Frick

Compiled by Tom Walter

From America Online computer information service PPS Bulletin Board

PLEASE NOTE: READ ME FIRST!

These general answers and our on-line discussion on 3/7/95 represent what is written in the medical literature on PPS, our newest research and how we treat patients at the Kessler Post-Polio Service. They are NOT intended as therapeutic recommendations for you personally nor as a substitute for your being evaluated by your own personal doctor and a doctor who knows about PPS.

Every polio survivor (PS) is different and prescribed treatments must take those differences into account.

Post-Polio Sequelae (PPS) is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning a physician must evaluate you and determine that no other condition is causing your symptoms. You may have PPS alone, PPS and another problem or a condition not related to polio at all. There are no medical tests that can prove you have PPS.

Read these answers, read the journal articles listed with each, and understand them fully. Take them to your doctor or therapist and ask them to read and understand them fully. Do not apply therapeutic techniques described here (especially exercise) on your own.

We very much hope these answers serve an educational purpose and that you integrate them with your own experience, personal wisdom and doctors’ recommendations so that you can thrive, not just survive, with PPS!

Best wishes, Drs. Richard Bruno and Nancy Frick

ABOUT PPS PREVENTION & PROGRESSION

There are no long-term studies of whether Polio Survivors (PS) who have no symptoms will develop PPS. Every time a study of PS is done, the percentage with new problems increases. The percentage was 22.4% in the first Mayo clinic study in 1982 and increased to 78% in a British polio hospital follow-up in 1987. At the NY Academy of Sciences Symposium on PPS April, 1994, the Mayo group and others thought that more than 90% of PS would develop some problems related to their polio.

Every PS is different. But, the rules that apply to every mortal apply to PS. Anyone who has too few

overworked, damaged nerves compensating for muscle weakness for over 40 years is bound to have some problems. And, when you.add PS super Type A lifestyles and the fact the they work more hours of overtime than non-disabled people, something’s got to give.

But, the good news it that the study cited below and our new follow-up study of all the patients we have treated show that if you listen to your body and stop doing the things that cause weakness, fatigue and pain, PPS often plateau and can even decrease (see below: Exercise & Activity). One example: 18 months after their evaluation with us, PS who completed therapy reported 22% LESS fatigue; however, PS who refused treatment or dropped out of therapy early had 21% MORE fatigue at 18 months.

References

Peach PE, Olejnik S Effect of treatment and non-compliance on Post-Polio Sequelae. ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 14(11) : 1199. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

ABOUT EXERCISE & ACTIVITY

Exercise has been the most hotly debated area in PPS. The studies cited below say three things:

  1. Listen to your body! If you are doing things that cause fatigue, weakness or pain STOP DOING THEM!!! PS need to pace their activities, that is work and then rest about 2 times the amount they worked. Jim Agre showed that PS can do 240% more work if they PACE. You don’t drive your car until it’s out of gas; you shouldn’t drive yourself to exhaustion, weakness or pain;
  2. We only prescribe the non-fatiguing exercises devised by Rubin Feldman that have been shown not to hurt PS. But, these exercises are not given to all patients and are only prescribed after PS learn to pace and conserve energy! Patients are usually given gentle exercise after they get a new brace to keep muscle tone. The key word is NON-FATIGUING;
  3. We have seen a small handful of PS who became deconditioned after surgery or illness. Pacing and resting doesn’t mean sitting or sleeping all day and not moving. You should be doing what you need to do for yourself, and at your job, but in a paced, energy conserving, Type B fashion.

In our follow-up of all the patients we have treated, the three factors that were related to a significant decrease in fatigue were

  1. completing the PPS therapy program;
  2. doing absolutely nothing for 15 minutes twice a day;
  3. using a wheelchair or scooter for distances.

References

Young GR. Energy conservation, occupational therapy and the treatment of Post-Polio Sequelae. ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 14(11): 1233. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

Feldman RM, Soskolne CL. The use of non-fatiguing strengthening exercises in Post-Polio Syndrome. In LS Halstead and DO Wiechers (Eds) Research and Clinical Aspects of the Late Effects of Poliomyelitis. White Plains: March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, 1987. [PubMed Abstract]

Fillyaw MJ, et al. The effects of long-term non-fatiguing resistance exercise in subjects with Post-Polio Syndrome. ORTHOPEDICS,1991,14(11):1253. [PubMed Abstract]

Agre JC and Rodriguez AA. Neuromuscular function in polio survivors. ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 14(12): 1343. [PubMed Abstract]

ABOUT FEET & LEGS

PS are notorious for having cold and purple “polio feet,” caused in part by the smooth muscle around the veins being partially paralysed by the original polio. Without muscle to control their size, veins fill with blood and cause your feet to appear purple. Your feet become cold because the heat in this pooled blood

escapes into the air. Back in 1983, we found that PS’s nerves and veins act as if it’s 20 degrees colder than the air, making it hard for the nerves, muscles and connective tissues to work. PS lost 75% of their muscle strength when the room temperature dropped from 85 to 65 degrees Fahrenheit.

Cold is the #2 cause of muscle weakness in PS but is the easiest to treat. We suggest that our patients take a bath in the morning, dry off and put on Polypropylene socks or long johns while they are still warm. Polypropylene (trade name: Gortex, Thinsulate) is a silk-like plastic that holds heat in but allows sweating.

Also, engorged veins can cause swelling, especially when feet get hot in Summer or after a long bath. Jobst compression stockings sometimes help, as well as keeping your feet up a lot during the day. But, leg swelling must be evaluated by your doctor!

References

Bruno RL, Johnson JC, Berman WS. Vasomotor abnormalities as Post-Polio Sequelae. ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 8 (7): 865-869. [PubMed Abstract]

ABOUT GETTING OTHER DISEASES

PS can get all the diseases everyone else gets. That’s why your doctor has to exclude all other causes for your new symptoms before you settle on PPS. In our 1985 National Post-Polio Survey we discovered that PS were on average more Type A – pressured, time-conscious, overachieving, perfectionistic than any other group of Americans, including those who already had had heart attacks. However, PS were no more likely to have heart attacks or high blood pressure than anyone else.

We found that PS also had 3 to 6 times more trouble with gut problems diarrhoea, constipation, ulcer and colitis – as compared to the general population. PS also have more headaches (but not migraines) and muscle pain (often called Fibromyalgia). And, there is also one study that suggests that more PS have hypothyroidism.

Also, 66% of PS report frequent anxiety and 31% of those who see us for evaluation have a Major Depressive Episode – that’s 6 times the rate for the general population. Both old and new types of antidepressants are effective if prescribed for PS. Again, your doctor needs to evaluate any and all new Syrnptoms!

References

Bruno RL, Frick NM. Stress and “Type A” behavior as precipitants of Post-Polio Sequelae: The Felician/Columbia Survey. In LS Halstead and DO Wiechers (Eds.): Research & Clinical Aspects of the Late Effects of Poliomyelitis. White Plains: March of Dimes Research Foundation, 1987. [Lincolnshire

Library Full Text]

Bruno RL, Frick NM. The psychology of polio as prelude to Post-Polio Sequelae: Behavior modification and psychotherapy. ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 14(11) : 1185-1193. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

Halstead LS. Assessment and differential diagnosis for Post-Polio Syndrome. ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 14(1l): 1209. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

ABOUT DRUGS FOR PPS

A number of drug studies were presented at the NY Academy of Sciences Symposium on PPS in April, 1994. Prednisone (a steroid) and Amantidine were tried without success to treat PPS weakness and fatigue. Growth hormone was not found to be helpful to treat new muscle weakness in one paper, but a multi-center study is beginning.

Neal Cashman again reported on the use of Mestinon to treat muscle fatigue. He found that a portion of PS whose motor nerves don’t communicate well with muscles report a decrease in muscle fatigue while using Mestinon. However, the effect of Mestinon seems to wear off over time.

We presented our pilot study of a drug to treat PPS brain fatigue. In the 10% of our patients whose fatigue did not improve following the standard treatment for PPS (see above: Exercise and Activity), 60% reported less morning fatigue and less trouble staying awake on drug versus placebo. However, even if drugs are found that help, PS must still listen to their bodies and live their lives in a paced, energy conserving, Type B fashion. There is no magic pill.

References

Bruno RL, Frick NM, Lewis T, Creange SJ. The physiology of post-polio fatigue: A model for post-viral fatigue syndromes and a brain fatigue generator. CFIDS Chronicle, 1994, 7(4): 36-42.

ABOUT MUSCLE TWITCHING

In the 1985 National PPS Survey, we found that 63% of all PS report that their muscles twitch and jump as they fall asleep; 33% reported that their sleep was disturbed by twitching. This sleep disorder, called Generalized Random Myoclonus, is often only noticed by the PS’s bed partner. In doing sleep studies, we found that a small dose of Ativan before bed usually stops the movements and restores sleep.

Other sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea, are not uncommon in PS. If you snore, wake not rested, with a headache or are depressed, you should talk to your doctor about a sleep study.

Many PS report another kind of muscle movement during the day: fasiculations. These are muscle twitches you can see or feel. Fasiculations are found in many non-disabled people. Usually, they are a sign, as is muscle pain, of muscle overuse. Again, talk to your doctor about any twitching.

References

Bruno RL, Frick NM. Stress and “Type A” behavior as precipitants of Post-Polio Sequelae: The Felician/Columbia Survey. In LS Halstead and DO Wiechers (Eds.): Research & Clinical Aspects of the Late Effects of Poliomyelitis. White Plains: March of Dimes Research Foundation, 1987. [Lincolnshire

Library Full Text]

Bruno RL, Frick NM, Creange SJ. Nocturnal generalized myoclonus as a post-polio sequelae. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1995, (in press).

Bach JR and Alba AA. Pulmonary dysfunction and sleep disordered breathing as Post-Polio Sequelae: Evaluation and management. ORTHOPEDICS,1991,14(12):1329. [Lincolnshire Library Full Text]

The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

Registered Charity No. 1064177

An Information Service for Polio Survivors and Medical Professionals

All enquiries, book requests, medical article requests, membership fees, items for newsletters and donations to

The Secretary, Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

PO Box 954, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN5 5ER United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0)1522 888601

Facsimile: +44 (0)870 1600840

Email: info@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

Web Site: www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network takes great care in the transcription of all information that appears at this site. However, we do not accept liability for any damage resulting directly or otherwise from any errors introduced in the transcription. Neither do we accept liability for any damage resulting directly or otherwise from the information available at this site. The opinions expressed in the documents available at this site are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily constitute endorsement or approval by the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network.

© Copyright The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

Copyright is retained by The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network and/or original author(s). Permission is granted to print copies of individual articles for personal use provided they are printed in their entirety. Links from other Internet WWW sites are welcome and encouraged. We only ask that you let us know so that we can in future notify you of critical changes. Reproduction and redistribution of any articles via any media, with the exception of the aforementioned, requires permission from The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network and where applicable, the original author(s).

Document preparation: Chris Salter, Original Think-tank, Cornwall, United Kingdom.

Document Reference: <URL:http://www.zynet.co.uk/ott/polio/lincolnshire/library/kessler/ppsqa.html> Created: 30th July 1997

Last modification: 30th January 2010.

PPS Questions and Answers Read More »

Regina Polio Survivors

Post-Polio Fatigue – How it can change your mind

One of the most frustrating effects of post polio was the awareness that I could not concentrate and a feeling that I wasn’t thinking clearly any more. For many of us who have compensated for our physical limitations through intellectual pursuits, this is a terrifying feeling. Is it not bad enough that our bodies are giving out? Must we undergo the indignity of losing our minds as well? Studies show that in spite of marked impairments of attention, polio survivors are within the high normal or superior range on measures of higher-level cognitive processes and IQ. They also show that if we allow ourselves to become fatigued we do lose our ability to focus our attention and to rapidly process complex information (requiring 23 to 67% more time to complete tasks requiring sustained attention and vigilance than did polio survivors with no fatigue or mild fatigue).

Polio survivors experience two kinds of fatigue. One is physical tiredness and decreased endurance. The other and often more distressing kind is “brain fatigue.” Brain fatigue describes problems with attention, alertness and thinking. Between 70% and 96% of polio survivors reporting fatigue complained of problems with concentration (96%), memory (85%), attention (82%), word finding (80%), staying awake, and clear thinking, (70%). Tests indicate that an impairment of selective attention (related to damage as a result of polio) results in feelings of fatigue and cognitive problems.

The polio virus damages the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord but that is not all it damages. It also damages parts of the brain stem. Findings indicate that polio virus consistently and often severely damaged the brain areas known as the Reticular Activating System. These areas are responsible for activating the part of the brain involved in maintaining voluntary attention, memory, spontaneous interest, initiative and the capacity for effort and work, and for preventing feelings of fatigue. This is the area that keeps us awake and allows us to focus our attention. Polio Survivors report that they are most disabled by the visceral symptoms of fatigue. These feelings of exhaustion, passivity and aversion to continued effort that generate an avoidance to both mental and physical activity. Dr. R.L. Bruno suggests the existence of a Fatigue Generator in the brain. His findings suggest that there is a close relationship between fatigue and impaired attention. There would be survival value in a brain mechanism that promotes rest when attention and information processing ability are impaired. An area of the brain (the Basil Ganglia) may generate mental and physical fatigue. When the Reticular Activation System is damaged the Fatigue generator takes over and produces problems with focusing attention and physically moving without significant conscious effort. Damage caused by the polio virus chronically reduces the firing of the nerve cells in the Reticular Activating System. Rest or sleep would increase the firing of the brain activating system nerves, restore activation and once again allow motor behavior.

The damage would explain why polio survivors have no difficulty concentrating after the original infection but why we are developing problems thirty to forty years later. One theory is that the age-related loss of nerve cells combined with an already abnormal small number of nerve cells as a result of the original polio virus infection may impair the brain’s activating system enough to produce impaired attention and fatigue as polio survivors reach mid life.

The first step in treating the disorders of concentration, memory, attention, word finding, staying awake and clear thinking is to deal with the fatigue. Energy conservation, work simplification and the proper provision of rest periods throughout the day are the treatments of choice in dealing with post polio fatigue. Stress management is also critical in the treatment of post polio fatigue. Dr. Bruno et al are currently studying the use of medication ( a post-synaptic dopamine receptor agonist currently used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease) in the treatment of post polio patients who do not respond to conservative treatments. They caution that there is a real danger that treatment with medications will allow polio survivors to resume their hyperactive lifestyles and further stress polio virus damages, “metabolically vulnerable” neurons in the brain stem and anterior horn.

As with any treatment strategy we must try to find the most effective treatment that will do the least damage while helping us to deal with our current problems. Certainly reducing physical and emotional stress in our lives and getting adequate rest make sense for everyone, even polio survivors. The good news is if you get rested, you will find your ability to concentrate, pay attention, remember words and stay awake will improve. You may even find that you can enjoy reading and thinking again!

Reprinted from Regina Polio Survivors Newsletter, Saskatchewan Awareness of Post Polio Inc., February 1995

Regina Polio Survivors Read More »

Post Polio Fatigue How it Can Change your Mind

Post-Polio Fatigue – How it can change your mind

One of the most frustrating effects of post polio was the awareness that I could not concentrate and a feeling that I wasn’t thinking clearly any more. For many of us who have compensated for our physical limitations through intellectual pursuits, this is a terrifying feeling. Is it not bad enough that our bodies are giving out? Must we undergo the indignity of losing our minds as well? Studies show that in spite of marked impairments of attention, polio survivors are within the high normal or superior range on measures of higher-level cognitive processes and IQ. They also show that if we allow ourselves to become fatigued we do lose our ability to focus our attention and to rapidly process complex information (requiring 23 to 67% more time to complete tasks requiring sustained attention and vigilance than did polio survivors with no fatigue or mild fatigue).

Polio survivors experience two kinds of fatigue. One is physical tiredness and decreased endurance. The other and often more distressing kind is “brain fatigue.” Brain fatigue describes problems with attention, alertness and thinking. Between 70% and 96% of polio survivors reporting fatigue complained of problems with concentration (96%), memory (85%), attention (82%), word finding (80%), staying awake, and clear thinking, (70%). Tests indicate that an impairment of selective attention (related to damage as a result of polio) results in feelings of fatigue and cognitive problems.

The polio virus damages the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord but that is not all it damages. It also damages parts of the brain stem. Findings indicate that polio virus consistently and often severely damaged the brain areas known as the Reticular Activating System. These areas are responsible for activating the part of the brain involved in maintaining voluntary attention, memory, spontaneous interest, initiative and the capacity for effort and work, and for preventing feelings of fatigue. This is the area that keeps us awake and allows us to focus our attention. Polio Survivors report that they are most disabled by the visceral symptoms of fatigue. These feelings of exhaustion, passivity and aversion to continued effort that generate an avoidance to both mental and physical activity. Dr. R.L. Bruno suggests the existence of a Fatigue Generator in the brain. His findings suggest that there is a close relationship between fatigue and impaired attention. There would be survival value in a brain mechanism that promotes rest when attention and information processing ability are impaired. An area of the brain (the Basil Ganglia) may generate mental and physical fatigue. When the Reticular Activation System is damaged the Fatigue generator takes over and produces problems with focusing attention and physically moving without significant conscious effort. Damage caused by the polio virus chronically reduces the firing of the nerve cells in the Reticular Activating System. Rest or sleep would increase the firing of the brain activating system nerves, restore activation and once again allow motor behavior.

The damage would explain why polio survivors have no difficulty concentrating after the original infection but why we are developing problems thirty to forty years later. One theory is that the age-related loss of nerve cells combined with an already abnormal small number of nerve cells as a result of the original polio virus infection may impair the brain’s activating system enough to produce impaired attention and fatigue as polio survivors reach mid life.

The first step in treating the disorders of concentration, memory, attention, word finding, staying awake and clear thinking is to deal with the fatigue. Energy conservation, work simplification and the proper provision of rest periods throughout the day are the treatments of choice in dealing with post polio fatigue. Stress management is also critical in the treatment of post polio fatigue. Dr. Bruno et al are currently studying the use of medication ( a post-synaptic dopamine receptor agonist currently used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease) in the treatment of post polio patients who do not respond to conservative treatments. They caution that there is a real danger that treatment with medications will allow polio survivors to resume their hyperactive lifestyles and further stress polio virus damages, “metabolically vulnerable” neurons in the brain stem and anterior horn.

As with any treatment strategy we must try to find the most effective treatment that will do the least damage while helping us to deal with our current problems. Certainly reducing physical and emotional stress in our lives and getting adequate rest make sense for everyone, even polio survivors. The good news is if you get rested, you will find your ability to concentrate, pay attention, remember words and stay awake will improve. You may even find that you can enjoy reading and thinking again!

Reprinted from Regina Polio Survivors Newsletter, Saskatchewan Awareness of Post Polio Inc., February 1995

Post Polio Fatigue How it Can Change your Mind Read More »

The Norwegian Polio Study 1994

The Norwegian Polio Study 1994

Polioundersokeisen LFPS 1994

A-K. Schanke and S. Andersson Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, N-1450 Nesoddtangen, Norway

A summary

Aim of the study – The aim of Polioundersokelsen LFPS 1994 (The Norwegian Polio Study 1994) was to make a survey of the medical and social situation and of the needs of polio survivors, in particular as a basis for the planning of future public services, especially public health services. Besides, the results would also give general information about polio survivors to the Norwegian Health and Social Services, politicians and others interested in the material, among them especially polio survivors themselves.

Material/method

A questionnaire was sent to a total of 2392 polio survivors, the names given by Landsforeningen for polioskadde (the Association for polio survivors). 1449 persons answered (61%), 980 women (answering percentage 76) and 459 men (answering percentage 42). However, between 5.000- 10,000 persons in Norway are estimated to be polio survivors.

The questionnaire consisted of 133 questions, with sub-questions, concerning medical problems and needs during the different phases of polio (the acute phase, the rehabilitation phase, the stable phase and eventually the late sequelae phase) The questions also included social, physical and employment status as well as the polio survivors’ opinion of the services offered by the public health today, and wishes for the services in the future.

Statistical evaluations were made by the use of the statistical program SPSS.

Results

Those participating in the survey were from all Norwegian counties, with a distribution similar to the distribution of the population in Norway.

Age

66% were between 45 and 64 years of age, 9% were below 45 years, and 25% were above 64 years. The acute phase/the rehabilitation phase

Acute poliomyelitis afflicted 78% of today’s survivors during the period from 1940 to 1954, while only 3% were struck after 1960. 82% were below the age of 18, and 63% below the age of 10 when they were struck. A few more women than men stated that they had polio before the age of 5, otherwise polio affected both genders equally.

The paresis in the acute phase were most frequent and most serious in the legs. A total of 73% had paresis in the legs versus 44% in the arms. The paresis were equally frequent in the left and right side of the body. In the acute phase 55% stated that they had paresis of the back-muscles, 47% of the abdominal muscles, and 22% of the respiratory muscles.

In the acute phase a total of 71% were hospitalized, and 18% attended hospital for more than one year. 20% were hospitalized far away from their homes, and 47% stated that they rarely or never had visitors while attending hospital/institutions during the acute and rehabilitation phase. Some were sent abroad for treatment, in this survey totally 130 subjects (9%).

One or several operations were performed in 45% of the polio survivors. These were stated as successful in approx. 60% of the cases.

Physical exercise during the rehabilitation period took place more than three times weekly for approx. 1/3, two to three times weekly for another 1/3, and once or fewer times for the last 1/3.

The stable phase

The majority achieved a considerable improvement of the paresis during the rehabilitation phase, and thereafter they experienced a long-lasting, stable phase. However, a majority of the polio survivors have experienced new health problems related to their polio, and the outbreak of these problems most frequently occurred 30-40 years after acute polio, independent of the age at their acute illness.

Late sequalae

When specifying new health problems 85% stated that they had experienced increased weakness in muscles affected by polio, while 58% had experienced increased weakness in previous non-affected muscles. Other health problems related to polio were fatigue during exercise (80%), general fatigue

(57%), joint pain (58%), muscular pain (53%), cold intolerance (62%), numbness (47%), sleep disturbances (48%), swelling of legs/feet (43%), dyspnoea during exercise/general dyspnoea (41%/16%) and concentration problems (39%).

Need of assistance

The participants in this survey indicated an increasing need of aids, but 80% were still independent of help from others during daily activities when the conditions were organized. 74% were still able to walk, with or without walking-aids, 70% could walk in stairs, but only 38% could “carry things’ and only 46% could perform ordinary housework.

Employment

Only 15% of the participants stated that they never had had paid employment, and 57 % stated that they still were employed, fully or part-time. Several had changed from full to part time work, or had changed jobs because of their polio, but a total of 65% had been, or were still, working full time.

Health services

Only 17% of the participants stated that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the public health services for polio survivors, while 26% were dissatisfied. However, 67% were satisfied with the comprehensive examinations given at e.g. Sunnaas Hospital, Haukeland Hospital and at the Regional Hospital in Trondheim. Such examinations have so far been offered to approx. 30% of the participants of this study, but more than half of those remaining wanted a similar examination. The reason for this lack of medical service was lacking expertise in their home county, lack of guarantee for transferring into another

county, or because the doctor did not want to apply for such an extensive examination. Thus there is a large geographical difference in the medical services for polio survivors in Norway.

Social services

The treatment at the social services offices were considered good or very good by 50% of the participants, while only8 % stated that they were treated badly. Our results also show that it might be useful to appeal cases refused by the social services office.

Approx. half of the participants had extra expenses because of their polio, which were not covered by the social security system, and it was discovered that several did not take advantage of their lawful rights to have these extra expenses covered, such as payment for physical therapy, orthopedic shoes, special reductions in their taxes, etc.

Treatment

Of the different forms of treatment approx. 2/3 stated that they had beneficial effects of physical therapy, massage and treatment in hot water (extra warmed up swimming pool). A regular contact with a doctor/specialist and a physical therapist was wanted by a majority of the participants, including a comprehensive multidisciplinary examination and evaluation as mentioned above.

A most wanted treatment is therapy travel to a warmer climate (approx. 50%). Out of the 30 % who had already stayed in warmer climate on their own initiative, more that 90% stated a subjective improvement of their problems, and only 6% had a duration of this positive effect of less than five weeks after their return to home

Conclusion

The results of this survey confirm the results of previous surveys from Norway, Denmark and USA, considering that most polio survivors experience new health problems and an increased need for aids and health services because of their polio.

Many of the polio survivors in Norway are dissatisfied with the present medical and health services, and there are large geographical differences in such services. However, most participants are satisfied with the type of multidisciplinary examinations/evaluations given at some few regional hospitals, but these services are so far only available to a maximum of 1/3 of those who need them. Such services must therefore be given priority in all health regions.

As the group of polio survivors will constitute a relatively large group in the society for many years to come, it must be an obvious demand that society gives satisfactory and equal health services to everybody in this group. This survey can hopefully be the basis for a positive construction of better services, involving to a significant degree the experiences from the polio survivors themselves.

PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION, DISTRESS AND COPING BEHAVIOUR

AMONG POLIO SURVIVORS.

A follow-up study of 63 polio-survivors, 20 males and 43 females, aged 33 to 77 years (M= 55,2) were assessed with the following methods: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Brief Type-A Questionnaire, COPE, Fatigue Severity Scale and heart rate reactivity. 23,8% of the patients showed elevated score on the anxiety scale (HAD-A> 8), 11% showed elevated score on the depression scale (HAD-D >8). The patient group had increased score on the fatigue scale (M=5,5) and on the Sleep/Rest SIP-subscale (M=23,7). With respect to coping styles we found that the post-polio patients have high score on problem-focused coping and low on avoidance coping. No significant sex differences were found. In contradiction to previous reported studies we did not find any indication of Type-A behaviour in our sample, supported by results showing no increased heart rate reactivity compared to an aged-matched control group. Our results are discussed in relation to the importance of timing in research in psychosocial adaption, noting that people tend to be more distressed closer to the onset of the stressor. Thus, the length time between the onset of new symptoms and psychometric and psychosocial testing may be a performance variable reflecting the process of adaptation.

The Norwegian Polio Study 1994 Read More »

Drugs to Lower Cholesterol a Warning to Polio Survivors

Drugs to Lower Cholesterol: A Warning for Polio Survivors

Revised from Jan. 1995, Ruth Wyler-Plaut, New Jersy PPSG

Why a History of Polio is Critical

This article is one of several that will discuss drugs which, because of their mechanism of action on the body, should be prescribed with caution to polio survivors and their effects carefully watched over a period of time.

Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs of Concern

Recently there have been several reports of serious musculoskeletal problems in polio survivors receiving the cholesterol-lowering drugs Lopid® (gemfibrozil) and Mevacor® (lovastatin). A review of the 1995 Physicians Desk Reference (PDR), which is a listing and description of all drugs available by prescription in the United States, shows that these drugs are members of two of three categories of drugs prescribed for the treatment of hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol and/or triglycerides) that can affect skeletal muscles in a small percentage (less than 1% of patients.

The three categories of drugs with well-known skeletal muscle side effects are:

  1. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, such as Mevacor® (lovastatin), Zocor® (simvastatin), Lescol® (fluvastatin), and Pravachol® (pravastatin) 2. Fibric acid derivatives, such as Lopid® (gemfibrozil), and Atromid-S® (clofibrate) 3. Niacin at very high doses (1 gram or higher a day). Niacin, also known as nicotinic acid, is prescribed under the names Nicolar® and Nicobid®.

You’ll note each drug has at least two names: a trade name (the name capitalized and shown with the ® symbol), and a generic name (the name in parentheses). Either name may be used in talking about the drug.

What Are Their Skeletal Muscle Effects?

The muscle symptoms of these drugs are very similar to those of the post-polio syndrome (PPS), and as a result in several polio survivors have been attributed to a flare-up of PPS rather than to an adverse drug effect. The adverse symptoms are fatigue, myalgia (muscle pain), tendreness of muscle to touch, myositis (inflammation of muscle), and muscle weakness, at times immobilizing patients. These symptoms are an early warning of the most serious effect – rhabdomyolysis, a term used to describe disintegration or dissolution of muscle. Besides greatly weakening muscles, if rhabdomyolysis goes unchecked it can cause kidney failure and possibly death. Sudden, severe rhabdomyolysis has been seen as early as a few weeks after starting drug treatment, but it may not be seen for several months or even a year or more.

le to separate the drug effects from symptoms of PPS. Good medical parctice requires periodic laboratory tests for any patient using these drugs. Tests showing very high levels of creatine kinase (CK) and elevated liver enzimes in the blood, and possibly of myoglovin (an oxygen-transporting pigment in muscles) in the urine, are positive evidence of both the presence and degree of muscle damage. As stated, less than one percent of all patients given these drugs have any type of muscle problems, and those who get rhabdomyolysis are even fewer, probably because treatment is usually stopped before the muscle effect progresses that far. There is no information to indicate that polio survivors are more likely to experience these effects.

In cases of rhabdomyolysis, normal muscle function returns for the average patient within 3 months to a year or more after stopping treatment with these drugs. It is not known to date if polio survivors have the same capacity to rebuild the damaged muscles. Any patient (including polio survivors) receiving any of the drugs listed above and experiencing muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness or dark urine should report these symptoms immediately to their doctor.

Additional Warnings

The risk of muscle breakdown is much greater in patients when they receive drugs from Category 1 (Mevacor, Zocor, Lescol, Pravachol) in combination with certain other drugs, such as those from Category 2 (Lopid or Atromid-S) or Category 3 (high-dose niacin); the antibiotic erythromycin; immunosuppressive drugs (eg. cyclosporine); or antifungal therapy (eg. itraconazole). The risk of muscle breakdown is also greater in patients with kidney disease or diabetes.

Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs With Less Skeletal Muscle Effect

Several other drugs that are used to treat elevated cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels have shown less evidence (Colestid® and Questran® [both cholestyramine resins]) or no evidence (Lorelco® (probucol]) of an effect on skeletal muscles. Colestid and Questran fall into the category of bile-acid binders. Lorelco works by a mechanism different from any of the other drugs.

Alternate Methods of Lowering Cholesterol

The drugs above are prescribed to treat various types of familial hyperlipidemia, very specific conditions. The “Indications for Use” by all manufacturers note that such methods as eating a diet low in saturated fats and cholesterol, exercise, weight control, control of diabetes, treatment of hypothyroidism (low thyroid levels) and of alcoholism, must be tried before use of these drugs should be considered. Most require a patient to follow a diet low in cholesterol and fat during drug treatment as well.

The Question of Benefit vs Risk in Polio Survivors

There is recent evidence Zocor (simvastatin), combined with diet, improved survival in patients with

evated cholesterol levels and evidence of heart disease. Similar results were observed with cholestyramine resin some years ago.

However, in view of the musculoskeletal side effects described above, polio survivors need to discuss with their doctor the possible risks of using these drugs for control of cholesterol compared to the possible benefits. A history of having had polio can be important in making this decision. Ruth Wyler-Plaut, the author of this article and a polio survivor, recently retired form Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, where she was Manager of the Medical Writing Department in the Division of Clinical Research, 2/13/95 Do not discontinue any medication without consulting the prescribing doctor.

Drugs to Lower Cholesterol a Warning to Polio Survivors Read More »

Personality Profile of patients diagnosed with post polio syndrome

Title: A personality profile of patients diagnosed with post-polio syndrome

Author(s): Clark K, Dinsmore S, Grafman J, Dalakas MC Source: Neurology 1994 Oct;44(10):1809-11.

NLM UI: 95022189

Abstract: Post -polio syndrome (PPS) refers to the late development of new neuromuscular symptoms in previously stable poliomyelitis patients. Whether psychological disturbance plays a role in the manifestation of symptoms in these patients is unclear. We examined 22 patients fulfilling the clinical criteria for PPS with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-II (MMPI-II), Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scales, Chapman and Chapman Psychosis-Proneness Scales, Fatigue Scales, a neurobehavioral rating scale, and Cognitive Symptoms Self-Report Scales. The overwhelming majority of scale scores were within normal limits, and there was no indication that psychopathologic symptoms were associated with the development or severity of new muscle weakness in PPS patients. Women with PPS had significantly more somatic complaints, but were less socially isolated than men with PPS. This study confirms that the development or severity of new muscle weakness in carefully diagnosed PPS patients is not due to, or influenced by, underlying psychopathology

Personality Profile of patients diagnosed with post polio syndrome Read More »

L-Carnitine and Post Polio Syndrome

L-Carnitine and Post-Polio Syndrome

  1. J. Matheson, MD September 1994

Between 1991 and 1993 Dr. Thomas Lehmann from Switzerland, treated 27 persons with Post-polio syndrome with 1000 (-3000) mg/day of L-carnitine. Appropriate double blind crossover studies still need to be done. L-Carnitine – from “meat” (Latin: carnis) has been known for a long time. It is found mainly in the meat and liver of sheep, lambs, rabbits, in milk and in yeast. L-Carnitine is a prescription drug in Europe and is marketed in health food stores in the United States. It is available in health food stores in combination with aminoacids in Canada.

It was originally classed as Vitamin BT but can be produced in the body from methionin and lysine (with the aid of vitamin B6, vitamin C, niacin, pantothenic acid and iron) in the kidneys and liver. It is stored in muscles and liver. It is excreted by the kidneys. There is no known L-Carnitine toxicity. It has been reported that acetyl-L-Carnitine is more effective than L-Carnitine. D-Carnitine inhibits the action of L Carnitine The theory of why L-Carnitine works in post-polio syndrome is as follows. The paralyzed or weakened muscles of the polio survivor are atrophying or atrophied as a result of the late effects of polio. Because there is less muscle, there is less possibility to store L-Carnitine. When tissues become acidic (lactic acid from overuse)or there is desaturation of oxygen (due to respiratory insufficiency or bad vascularization, the concentration of L-Carnitine is lower in the blood, tissues and cells. The (over)use of muscles (whether atrophied or overused in compensation) has been shown to cause a local fall in levels of L-Carnitine. L-Carnitine improves the metabolism of oxygen, fat and glucose and inhibits the use (abuse) of muscle proteins for energy production. The deregulation or decompensation of the metabolism of fatty acids, glucose, oxygen, and energy (necessary for good muscle function) because of a lack of L-Carnitine could result in fatigue and weakness of the muscles. More studies need to be done and the results published. Research on L-Carnitine is currently being done in Europe and Australia. A strict vegetarian or vegan diet is very low in L-Carnitine and could accelerate weakness. I do not recommend that every polio survivor take L-Carnitine pills because we don’t know about toxic side effects yet. While we are waiting for the final answer, it would make sense for polio survivors to keep meat in their diets.

Resources:

Simon, Roberta & Darien, R.N, WHAT’S HAPPENING WITH RESEARCH MEDICATIONS, 1991, POLIO NETWORK NEWS

Lehmann, Thomas, MD, L-CARNITINE AND POST-POLIO SYNDROME, 1994, Handout – 6TH INTERNATIONAL G.I.N.I. CONFERENCE

This site is now maintained by Chris Salter of the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network Original Document Preparation: Tom Dempsey. Last modification: 12th December 1997

L-Carnitine and Post Polio Syndrome Read More »