PSN Library Files

Response to comments from Bridgens and Mathieson

Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System 1257 (2007)

We

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Response to comments

Dear Editor,

We thank the correspondents for their comments on our article (Sorenson et al., 2006) and respond with the following points. In response to Dr. Matheson, we modeled the MUNE decline using linear and pro portional models. These models used baseline data and 5-year data to predict a 15-year value for each subject. Each predicted value was compared to the corresponding observed value. Each model was then assessed to determine, which most closely approxi mated the observed data. We thank Dr. Matheson for identifying the error in the formula as it appears in the text. This error occurred as we simplified the calcu lations for the purposes of the manuscript. The cor rect equation is IniMUNE:/MUNEO) = |k7). After checking and repeating the calculations, the data as presented are correct. However, we did not use the models to compare rates of decline as Dr. Matheson has suggested. Neither the proportional nor the linear model was a strong fit with the data. In our opinion, the strength of the model is not sufficient to perfom the comparisons that Dr. Matheson has suggested.

We do acknowledge that the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups may differ in their true rates of decline and we may not have sufficient power to detect this. This point is acknowledged in the Discus sion where we review the limitations of our study. In our study group, however, the strongest predictor of symptomatic change was not the rate of decline but rather the magnitude of their residual weakness: sug gesting that this variable is more relevant to symp tomatic progression later in life. To our knowledge, there is only one other large, long-term follow-up study on polio survivors, and our data remain consis tent with their reported results Nollet et al., 2003)

Both correspondents raise the concern that we have overestimated the decline in motor units over

time in the normal aging population. The point of the cited article was not to perfom a statistical compari son but rather to demonstrate that normal subjects also undergo loss of motor neurons as they age. There are methodological differences between the cited study and ours, as we pointed out precluding any explicit comparisons. As pointed out in the article, we did not include a normal aging control group and without such a control group one cannot reliably com pare the changes in the polio group to that in a normal aging population. To our knowledge, no one has per formed a long-term prospective cohort study on the effects of normal aging on MUNE or CMAP ampli tudes. We do acknowledge that it remains theoretical that that MUNE declines in polio survivors commen surate with nomal aging. This hypothesis cannot be confirmed or excluded without a prospective study of polio survivors including normal age- and gender matched controls, which has not been done to date.

Sincerely Eric J. Sorenson, Jasper R. Daube,

Anthony J. Windebank Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinio,

Rochester, MN, USA

References

Nollet F. Beelen A Twisk JW. Lankhorst GJ, Visser M (2003)

Perceived health and physical functioning in post poliomyelitis syndrome: a 6-year prospective follow up

study. Arch Phys Med Rehab 84:1048-1056. Sorenson EJ, Daube Ji Windebank AJ (2006) Electrophysio

logical findings in a conort of old polio survivors j Peripher Nerv Syst 11:241-246.

Address correspondence to. Eric J. Sorenson, MD, Department of Neurology, Mavo Cinc, 200 1st st. SV Rochester, MN 55305. USA. Tel 507-538-1037, Fax. 507-266-5752 E-mail sorensoneria mayo.edu

© 2007 Peripheral Nerve Society

Blackwell Publishing

Response to comments from Bridgens and Mathieson Read More »

The Mayo Clinic Haunts Post Polio Patients Again

The Mayo Clinic haunts postpolio patients again 

Sorenson E. J., Daube J.R. and Windebank A. J. (2006) Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old  polio survivors. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, 11: 241-6 

Dr Ruth Bridgens 

In 1996, the Lancet published a news article called ‘Study casts doubt on postpolio syndrome’.  This was based on a Mayo Clinic 5-year follow-up study of 50 postpolio patients, 30 (60%) of  whom had new symptoms. (McCarthy 1996). The authors of the study concluded that as their  tests showed no neuromuscular decline, the patients’ new weakness, fatigue and pain should be  explained by other diagnoses such as arthritis and fibromyalgia (Windebank et al 1996).

In 2005, the Mayo Clinic team completed a 15-year follow-up of 38 of the 50 patients, finding that  31 (82%) had new weakness and there was a decline in strength, neuromuscular function and the  number of motor units in both those with and without new weakness (Sorenson et al 2005). A  motor unit is the motor neuron (nerve cell), the axon (nerve) and it sprouts, and the muscle fibres  maintained by the unit. The authors commented that as there was no control group, the effects  could not be compared with normal ageing. However, a recent article by Sorenson et al (2006)  again ‘casts doubt on postpolio syndrome’ by arguing that the decline in neuromuscular  measurements, particularly the estimated number of motor units (MUNE), was equal to normal  ageing. Not having used controls themselves, the authors compare their study to other studies  on motor units and ageing. It must be remembered that the results of a study and the  interpretation of the results depend, to some extent, on the intentions and original design of the  study. These influence the sample chosen, how terms are defined, the results that are  emphasised in the final discussion, the studies that are used as references and how those  references are interpreted.

Creating a sample 

The Mayo Clinic sample of 50 patients, selected from a population of 286 paralytic polio patients,  was chosen because they lived close to the clinic and could be followed more easily. This is  problematical because it is not a random sample and cannot be the basis for generalisations. The  sample was selected from a slightly larger group of 58 in order to try and match the original  population sample, but the group of 50 had a higher level of initial polio severity, were older  when they had polio (13 versus 9) and were not matched in relation to postpolio symptoms. In  the recent cohort of 38, the average polio age has risen to 15. Polio age differences are important  because even though research has found that those who were older had more severe polio and  were more likely to develop PPS, those who had polio at a younger age, often with better  recovery, have a relatively high risk of developing PPS and may have more symptoms such as  fatigue and pain. As the sample had such a high polio age it may not be representative of polio  populations in general.

Testing for weakness and muscle fatigue 

Rather than looking at postpolio symptoms and the problems they cause for patients, the Mayo  study team has concentrated solely on one postpolio symptom, weakness, and the tests to  measure it. These tests, such as the manual muscle test, have been shown to be of limited use and

1

The Mayo Clinic haunts postpolio patients again 

unreliable for polio patients as muscles compensate for each other (Perry et al 1988, Nollet et al  2003). Several studies have also shown that what is thought to be weakness in polio patients is  sometimes the rapid fatigue of muscles, for which there are no reliable tests (Nollet et al 1999,  Willen and Grimby 1998). It is often this rapid fatigability that has the biggest impact on daily  activities. Recent definitions of postpolio syndrome have included both muscle weakness and  endurance problems as major symptoms (Jubelt and Agre 2000).

Ageing and PPS 

The main conclusion of the recent Mayo Clinic article is that “the most likely cause for the decline  in our polio survivors is ageing alone.” The statement is based on the loss of motor units in  selected muscles of the whole group, which was 44.5% over 15 years or 3% per year. However,  this involved combining patients with and without new weakness, which was justified by the  lack of statistical significance between the differences of the two groups. But as the entire group  was quite small (38) and the group without weakness was extremely small (7), it would have  been difficult to ever obtain a statistically significant difference. In actuality, over the 15 years,  the group with weakness lost 61% or 4.1% per year and the group without weakness lost 22% or  1.5% per year. Even if not statistically significant, this is a substantial difference which requires  some explanation.

After many years of researching the loss of motor units through ageing, the consensus of the  major research teams in this field is that “motor unit numbers are well maintained until the  seventh decade and then begin to decline precipitously thereafter” (Doherty 2003: 1722) and that  “subjects in their seventh and eighth decades of life had about 50% fewer thenar MUs than  younger subjects between 20 and 40 years of age” (Doherty and Brown 1993: 364). A study by  Galea (1996) found approximately a 1% per year loss until age 70 when the average loss rose to  nearly 2%. In contrast, the Mayo Clinic researchers suggest that normal subjects have a 50%  decline between ages 40-60, a 2-3% decline per year. Using the figure of 1% per year below age  70, it would appear that the polio group with weakness was losing motor units at about 4 times  the normal rate and those without weakness were declining at slightly above the normal rate.

PPS symptoms and physical performance 

Sorenson et al justify their result of only modest progression in weakness by comparing their  study to a Dutch study by Nollet et al (2003) who found little decline in physical functioning over  six years, using younger people (46 years), who had polio at a younger age (2.9 years). Unlike the  Mayo Clinic study, the Dutch team explored not only weakness but other PPS symptoms and  daily function, selecting a group who showed a steeper decline in performance (27% of the  cohort) in order to try to understand the cause of postpolio syndrome. Results showed that it  was not muscle weakness but a higher number of PPS symptoms, such as fatigue and pain, that  predicted mobility decline. The authors suggest that in these cases performance was at the upper  end of muscle capacity causing overuse. They also found that how widespread the weakness  was predicted decline rather than the severity of weakness, as there are fewer strong muscles to  compensate for weaker ones.

The Dutch study indicates that in order to understand postpolio syndrome it is necessary to look  at the whole constellation of symptoms, performance of daily activities, the amount of initial  recovery, and the extent of weakness and muscle fatigue. By choosing to concentrate on only one

2

The Mayo Clinic haunts postpolio patients again 

aspect of postpolio syndrome, weakness, in a limited sample, the Mayo Clinic study has  overlooked the complexity of the changes, and how muscle fatigability may have major effects on  patients’ daily lives.

References 

Doherty T. J. and Brown W.F. (1993) The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as  selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults. Muscle and Nerve, 16:355-66

Galea V. (1996) Changes in motor unit estimates with ageing. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 13 (3): 253- 60

Jubelt B. and Agre J. (2000) Characteristics and management of postpolio syndrome. Journal of the American  Medical Association, 284 (4): 412-14

McCarthy M. (1996) Study casts doubt on postpolio syndrome. Lancet, 347: 458

Nollet F., Beelen A., Prins M.H., de Visser M., Sargeant A. J.,Lankhorst G. J. and de Jong B. A. (1999)  Disability and functional assessment in former polio patients with and without postpolio syndrome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80: 136-43

Nollet F., Beelen A., Twisk J.W., Lankhorst G.J. and de Visser M. (2003) Perceived health and physical  functioning in postpoliomyelitis syndrome: a 6 -year prospective follow-up study. Archives of Physical  Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84: 1048-56

Perry J., Barnes G. and Gronley J. K. (1988) The postpolio syndrome: an overuse phenomenon. Clinical  Orthopaedics and Related Research, 233: 145-162

Ramlow J., Alexander M., LaPorte R., Kaufman C. and Kuller L. (1992) Epidemiology of the post-polio  syndrome. American Journal of Epidemiology, 136 (7): 769-86

Sorensen E. J., Daube J.R. and Windebank A. J. (2005) A 15-year follow-up of neuromuscular function in  patients with prior poliomyelitis. Neurology, 64: 1070-72

Sorenson E. J., Daube J.R. and Windebank A. J. (2006) Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio  survivors. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, 11: 241-6

Windebank A. J., Litchy W. J., Daube J. R. and Iverson R. A. (1996) Lack of progression of neurological  deficit in survivors of paralytic polio. A 5 year prospective population-based study. Neurology, 46: 80-84

September 2006 

Address Correspondence to ruth.bridgens@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk 

PDF produced by the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network. 

Published September 23rd, 2006. 

Updated September 26th 2006. 

http://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/mayohauntsagain.pdf

3

The Mayo Clinic Haunts Post Polio Patients Again Read More »

Mune Data Review

MUNE data review

Dr. Mavis Matheson, M.D. (UBC), B Sc. (hon) Mathematics (U of Saskatchewan)

I am very concerned about the accuracy the article by (Sorenson et al, 2006)  Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors Eric J. Sorenson, Jasper R.  Daube, and Anthony J.Windebank published in Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System  11:241-246 (2006)

I’ve reviewed the article and if the math is done correctly, one gets entirely different results.

Page 242 bottom of first column to top of second column describes in detail the method for  calculating the rate of decline. Dr. Sorenson’s group describe using the first order kinetic  formula. The one at the bottom of the page gives (ln MUNE(5)) = (ln MUNE(0)) (-kT) which  is not right.

The change in P with respect to time, dP/dt = k*P is the first order kinetic formula. Integrating, one gets P(t) = P(0)*e(to the power k*t) (Stewart, 2003) so

kt =ln (MUNE(t) /MUNE(0) ) is the correct formula (Divide first then take the natural log) Dividing by the time t gives us k = 1/t * [ ln (MUNE(t) /MUNE(0)) ]

Using the study data, k = 1/5 * (ln (331/407)) = -.0413 using the 5 year data and k = 1/15 * (ln (226/407)) = -.0392 using the 15 year data

k is the relative growth rate (a negative value indicates loss) and since t is in years, expressing  k as a percentage gives MUNE declines at a rate of 4.13% per year using the 5 year data or  3.92% per year using the 15 year data.

The authors state “While neither model of loss (proportional or linear) closely matches the  data, the stronger correlation and better coefficient of variation would favor the proportional  model over the linear model.” After concluding the loss was proportional, at the top of page  245, they give us “a rate of decline of 2.9% annually” (with no supporting calculations). Using  the model they recommend and the given data, 2.9% is wrong. The rate of decline is 4.13% per year using the 5 year data or 3.92% per year using the 15 year data as show in the  calculations above.

The study (Doherty et al, 2003) is cited as the source of “However, in a cross-sectional study  of normal subjects, there was a decline in the thenar MUNE counts from a mean of 288 to 139 between the ages of 40 and 60 years (Doherty et al., 2003). This represents approximately a 50% decline, or 2-3% per year.” The study then compares 2.9% to the “normal” value  calculated using the MUNE mean values from (Doherty et al, 2003) . If the authors used data  other than their MUNE means to calculate their rate of decline, the data are not comparable.

I reviewed the study by Doherty et al. They very appropriately didn’t even try to give a rate of  decline per year. In their study, the two groups are described as “a group of younger (20 – 40  years) and older (60 to 80 years) healthy subjects.” The two groups are better described in  (Doherty et al, 1993) “In 37 trials from 17 younger subjects (20-40 years), the mean MUE was  288 +/- 95 SD based on negative peak area and, in 33 trials from 20 older subjects, mean

MUNE data review 

values were 139 +/- 68.” These are the numbers used to calculate “normal MUNE losses” at  the bottom of page 244 of (Sorenson et al, 2006).

Using the proportional model and (lacking more data), the middle of the age ranges instead of  the upper extreme of one range and the lower extreme of the other, one gets a change from 288  to 139 from age 30 to 70. (40 years)

k = 1/40 ((ln (139/288)) = -0.018 or a decline of 1.8% per year.

or, using the more general conclusion in (Doherty et al, 2003) that “on balance, average  MUNE values in groups over 60 years of age show reduction of about 50% in comparison to  younger controls” and the formula on page 242 of (Sorenson et al, 2006).

k = -0.693/(t =BD) = -0.693/(40) =-0.0172 or a decline of 1.72% per year.

The data do not support the conclusion “our polio cohort did not age any differently than a  normal population. This suggests that the most likely cause for the decline in our polio  survivors is aging alone.” (Sorenson et al, 2006) The polio survivors’ MUNE losses of 4.13%  per year using the 5 year data or 3.92% per year using the 15 year data were more than twice  the rate of 1.72% per year or 1.8% per year in a “normal” population. This is what  McComas found as stated on page 244. “McComas reported that the loss of motor units in  their subjects was approximately twice that seen in their normal population (McComas et al.,  1997).”

On page 243, (Sorenson et al, 2006), the authors state “There was no association between the  magnitude of decline in either the summated CMAP amplitude or the summated MUNE and  the presence of symptomatic progression.” and “There was a mean decline in MUNE of 229 (SD 43) for the asymptomatic group and a mean decline of 120 (SD 24) for the symptomatic group (p =BC 0.09).” Either this is wrong or Table 2 (on the same page) is wrong. Table 2  shows MUNE decline of 229 in the symptomatic group and 120 in the asymptomatic group.  The numbers in Table 2 are internally consistent, but the 15 year MUNE values are switched in  Table 2 and the paragraph on page 243 cited above.

Using MUNE values in Table 2 and the formula for proportional loss,

All subjects decline at 4.1% (5 years) and 3.9% (15 years)

Symptomatic at 3.5% (5 years) and 6.2% (15 years)

Asymptomatic at 2% (5 years) and 1.68% (15 years)

According to Table 2, over the 15 year period, the symptomatic group are losing motor units at  3.7 times the rate of the asymptomatic group. The fact that “only seven subjects remained  asymptomatic” probably means that this is not statistically significant so no conclusions can be  drawn, not that no association exists. Either the table is wrong, or the conclusions are wrong.

I have only looked at the MUNE data in detail so I can not comment on the CMAP data.

I am Dr. Mavis Matheson, M.D. (UBC), B Sc. (hon) Mathematics (U of Saskatchewan). I had  polio at age 16 months and live with the late effects of polio.

2

MUNE data review 

References

Doherty TJ, The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by  multiple point stimulation in young and older adults. Muscle & Nerve [Muscle Nerve],  (1993) Apr; Vol. 16 (4), pp. 355-366.

Doherty TJ, Stashuk DW, Brown WF, MUNE measurement of age-related changes. J Clin  Neurophysiol, (2003) 55:158-163.

McComas AJ, Quartly C, Griggs RC, Early and late losses of motor units after poliomyelitis Brain, (1997), 120, 1415-1421.

Stewart J, Exponential growth and decay. Calculus 5e, (2003), 10.4:647-655.

Sorenson EJ, Daube JR,Windebank AJ, A 15-year follow-up of neuromuscular function in  patients with prior poliomyelitis. Neurology [Neurology], 2005 Mar 22; Vol. 64 (6), pp.  1070-1072.

Sorenson EJ, Daube JR,Windebank AJ, Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio  survivors Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, (2006) 11:241-246.

Address Correspondence to mavis.matheson@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk  PDF produced by the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network. 

Published September 23rd, 2006. 

http://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/munedatareview.pdf

3

Mune Data Review Read More »

Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors

August 28, 2006

Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors. [Part I – The Article]
Sorenson EJ, Daube JR, Windebank AJ.
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2006 Sep;11(3):241-6.

A population-based cohort of poliomyelitis survivors was established and followed for 15 years (mean time since polio was 40 years). Over time, the cohort demonstrated a modest decline in summated compound muscle action potential amplitudes (CMAP) and a moderate decline in the summated motor unit number estimates (MUNE). There was no association between symptoms of late deterioration and magnitude of decline. Rather, the presence of these symptoms was associated with the magnitude of the residual deficits. Two patterns of neuron loss were modeled (linear and proportional decline). The summated MUNE was a more sensitive measure of loss of motor units than was the summated CMAP and appears to be a more valid measure of attritional loss of anterior horn cells. Of these two models of neuron loss, the proportional loss of motor neurons was a better fit of the data than a linear loss.

[Links below open in new windows]

Link to Abstract at journal site. Full text requires a subscription to journal or one-off payment of US$39 (at the time of writing).

Link to US National Library of Medicine (NLM) PubMed entry PMID: 16930286.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16930286?dopt=AbstractPlus

+++

August 28, 2006

Survivors of childhood polio do well decades later as they age. [Part II – The Press Release]

ROCHESTER, Minn. — Mayo Clinic researchers have found that years after experiencing childhood polio, most survivors do not experience declines greater than expected in their elderly counterparts, but rather experience only modest increased weakness which may be commensurate with normal aging.

“Other researchers have suggested that polio is a more aggressive condition later in life, but we’ve actually found it to be relatively benign,” says Eric Sorenson, M.D., Mayo Clinic neurologist and lead study researcher. “Our results suggest that polio survivors may not age any differently than those in the normal population — they’re not doing too badly compared to their peers. This tells us that the cause for the decline in muscle strength in polio survivors may be aging alone.”

Polio is a contagious, viral illness that peaked in the United States in 1952, when 3,000 people died of the disease. Mass immunizations in the mid-1950s began to slow the spread of the disease, and the last case of polio not caused by a vaccine occurred in the United States in 1979. The three major types of polio include spinal polio, a paralytic polio that attacks nerve cells in the spinal cord; bulbar polio, in which the virus attacks motor neurons in the brainstem; and bulbospinal polio, a combination of spinal and bulbar polios. The effects of polio run the gamut from a complete return to normal function to paralysis of limbs to acute death. Following the illness, most patients are worried about their long-term prognoses, according to Dr. Sorenson.

To conduct this study, the researchers randomly selected a group of 50 polio survivors from the general population of Olmsted County, home of Mayo Clinic, and followed them for 15 years. The average age of participants at the study’s start was 53, and the patients were an average of 40 years past their childhood experience with polio. The researchers measured strength and loss of neurons at the beginning of this period, and then again five and 15 years later with electrophysiological testing, strength testing and timed tests of performing basic functions. They found modest declines. Each patient also completed questionnaires about symptoms of progressive weakness at the beginning and end of the study period. Though the majority complained of progressive weakness during the time they were studied, these symptoms did not correspond with their actual magnitudes of decline over time. Rather, the researchers found patients’ symptoms experienced were associated with the degree of residual weakness immediately following their polio infections.

“Overall, we found that strength changed very little in these polio survivors as they grew older, and we discovered the neurons dropped off at a rate comparable to other non-polio survivors as they aged,” says Dr. Sorenson. “We concluded this was normal aging on top of their old deficits. Very few had to change their homes or add adaptive equipment. Those who had weakness problems during our study had a larger deficit at the end of their childhood disease, making them more likely to develop symptoms. So, as deficits at the end of the disease increase, the probability of experiencing post-polio symptoms increases.”

The discrepancy between what some of the patients experienced with growing weakness and their actual measurements of strength and neuronal loss likely is due to increased sensitivity due to their disease experiences, according to Dr. Sorenson.

“Patients feel their weakness progressing, but when you measure it, it’s very modest,” he says. “Likely, they lost so much strength at the time of their illness that any change is very noticeable to them. Though the likelihood is high that patients who have had childhood polio will complain of weakness later in life, they can expect years of stability without the need for major lifestyle modifications.”

Other Mayo Clinic researchers involved in this study include Anthony Windebank, M.D., and Jasper Daube, M.D. To obtain the latest news releases from Mayo Clinic, go to www.mayoclinic.org/news. MayoClinic.com (www.mayoclinic.com) is available as a resource for your health stories.

Contact: Lisa Lucier
newsbureau@mayo.edu
507-284-5005
Mayo Clinic

———

EurekAlert | Survivors of childhood polio do well decades later as they age. [Part II – The Press Release]
Public release date: 21-Aug-2006.

The original of the above article can be found at [link opens in new window]
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-08/mc-soc081506.php.

+++

August 28, 2006

‘No Polio effects’ in later life / Many Polio Survivors Faring Well. [Part III – The Media]

Opening Paragraphs + Extract:

People who survive polio in childhood will not suffer further effects later in life, say US researchers.

The Mayo Clinic team looked at 50 people who had had the disease as children and found most did not suffer any polio-related decline when older.

Polio has been wiped out in most places but remains a threat, particularly in India, Pakistan and Nigeria.

Experts said the Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System paper offered reassurance to polio survivors.

…

Dr Eric Sorenson, who led the study, said: “Other researchers have suggested that polio is a more aggressive condition later in life, but we’ve actually found it to be relatively benign.

“Our results suggest that polio survivors may not age any differently than those in the normal population – they’re not doing too badly compared to their peers.”

He added that the findings should be comforting to people worried about polio-related decline later in life.

“Though the likelihood is high that patients who have had childhood polio will complain of weakness later in life, they can expect years of stability without the need for major lifestyle modifications.”

———

BBC News | Health | ‘No Polio effects’ in later life.
Last Updated: Saturday, 26 August 2006, 23:55 GMT 00:55 UK.

The full text of the above article can be found at [link opens in new window]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4799725.stm.

+++

November 11, 2006

Dr. Sorenson responds to “Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study”. [Part VI – The Author’s Response]

[P&PPNews Editor: Dr. Sorenson’s numbered comments reference corresponding comments in “Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study”. Published with Dr. Sorenson’s permission.]

Dear Ms. Boone,

Thank you for your correspondence and your comments. Many of the points you raised are valid criticisms. I would make the following comments:

The study population was chosen to be a random, population based sample. This was done because this method of sampling is the least biased. There are always questions about whether or not: A) the sample cases are representative of the population from which they are drawn, and B) is the population that is sampled, representative of the diseased population as a whole. You mention that our sample is skewed with an over-representation of those more severely affected. Actually, if our sampled is biased it is biased towards those less affected. Approximately 40% of our subjects had only minimal neurological deficits. I’m not sure how you arrived at the 90% being severe. Only about 20% of our subjects would we have classified as severe.
In our study we did find that the polio subjects did weaken modestly with time, but the degree of this weakness did not correlate with whether or not they were symptomatic. The only correlation with symptoms was with the severity of their residual deficits after polio. I am only aware of one other large prospective study on polio from the Netherlands that over a 6 year period found similar results (Nollet F. et. Al. Perceived health and physical functioning in postpoliomyelitis syndrome: a 6-year prospective follow-up study. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 84(7):1048-56, 2003).

You may very well be correct that there is a subset of subjects that do more poorly than the group as a whole. Our polio cohort, as a whole, was fairly normally distributed in their magnitude of change over the course of the study. The majority of our cohort had only a modest decline in strength, however, there was a small minority that changed more and a small minority that didn’t change at all. In our cohort we did not identify any baseline variables that predicted the rate of change. Predictor variables may exist but we did not identify any.
I am not sure how to comment on this point. We have not presented any data with an intent to mislead or misrepresent.
I do not believe that anyone who sees polio patients questions the existence of the post-polio syndrome. I have not made any such claims. I believe the controversy is over our theory that the normal process of aging may be the root cause. It is true that we did not include a normal aging control group at the onset of our cohort study and this remains our speculation. A normal age matched control group has not been done in any previous long term study of polio survivors that I am aware of. This theory however has been erroneously interpreted that we are suggesting that polio survivors are merely getting older. In contrast, we propose that there is an attritional loss of motor neurons, muscle mass and strength in normal subjects. Because normal subjects have a considerable reserve capacity, they are not aware of these effects. Polio survivors however, who have already lost a number of motor neurons, no longer have that reserve capacity and the same attritional loss in them results in larger problems and progressive weakness. This would explain why those who with the largest residual deficits are more likely to be symptomatic; and why the polio group as a whole appears to decline in a relatively normally distributed fashion.
The issues related to the reliability and validity of MMT are valid. Because of this we did not only complete the MMT but also completed quantitative strength tests using a series of strain gauges resulting in specific force measurements in the muscle groups tested. It is difficult to translate these force measurements into an overall global measure of strength which can be done and has been validated with the NDS-w scale (MMT). In looking at the quantitative force measurements the results were the same as those with the NDS-w scores providing internal validity to our findings.
As you point out responses to questionnaires can be misleading. One of the drawbacks of questionnaire research is the subjectivity and the interpretation of the respondent. We asked a number of questions including specific questions such as: What gait aids do you use? What braces or orthotics do you use? What modifications have you made to your home? Etc. to minimize the subjectivity and variability of the respondents.
You are correct that it is often difficult to assess the extent of polio survivors residual effects by talking to or merely observing them. I am often struck by how polio survivors have adapted to their deficits. This is why it was important that we did our timed functional tasks, strength testing and electrophysiology testing at baseline and followed the group prospectively. Otherwise it is very difficult to determine this in a retrospective fashion. Even our baseline assessments were years after maximal recovery in all cases. What the polio subjects’ true maximal recovery was cannot be known for certain, and must be inferred.
I am sorry if our work has provided you or your colleagues difficulty or distress, none was intended.

Sincerely,

Eric J. Sorenson, MD Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905

END

Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study | Hilary Boone [PDF 157KB] | Minor Revisions 11th November 2006.
https://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/poliosurvivorsdoubtstudy.pdf

+++

September 23, 2006

Three reviews of ‘Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors’ (E. J. Sorenson, et al). [Part V – The Dissection]

The following articles consist of three separate reviews of the recently published ‘Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors’ [Sorenson EJ, Daube JR and Windebank AJ (2006) Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, Vol 11:241-246].

In “MUNE data review”, Dr. Mavis Matheson discusses significant inconsistencies in the math. “I’ve reviewed the article and if the math is done correctly, one gets entirely different results.”

MUNE data review | Dr. Mavis Matheson [PDF 102KB].
https://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/munedatareview.pdf

In the second article “The Mayo Clinic haunts postpolio patients again”, Dr Ruth Bridgens discusses a number of aspects including the cohort’s applicability to the wider population of polio survivors, the limitations of the measures chosen and the interpretation of their findings.

The Mayo Clinic haunts postpolio patients again | Dr Ruth Bridgens [PDF 149KB] | Updated 26th September 2006.
https://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/mayohauntsagain.pdf

Finally, in the third and last article of this set, “Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study”, Hilary Boone has applied a retrospective comparative analysis to all the major articles arising from this study published over its 15 year period. Based on that analysis, seven issues are raised which “we believe need to be taken into account before conclusive statements can be made regarding findings from Sorenson et al s research report.”

Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study | Hilary Boone [PDF 157KB] | Updated 11th November 2006.
https://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/poliosurvivorsdoubtstudy.pdf

+++

November 11, 2006

Dr. Sorenson responds to “Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study”. [Part VI – The Author’s Response]

[P&PPNews Editor: Dr. Sorenson’s numbered comments reference corresponding comments in “Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study”. Published with Dr. Sorenson’s permission.]

Dear Ms. Boone,

Thank you for your correspondence and your comments. Many of the points you raised are valid criticisms. I would make the following comments:

The study population was chosen to be a random, population based sample. This was done because this method of sampling is the least biased. There are always questions about whether or not: A) the sample cases are representative of the population from which they are drawn, and B) is the population that is sampled, representative of the diseased population as a whole. You mention that our sample is skewed with an over-representation of those more severely affected. Actually, if our sampled is biased it is biased towards those less affected. Approximately 40% of our subjects had only minimal neurological deficits. I’m not sure how you arrived at the 90% being severe. Only about 20% of our subjects would we have classified as severe.
In our study we did find that the polio subjects did weaken modestly with time, but the degree of this weakness did not correlate with whether or not they were symptomatic. The only correlation with symptoms was with the severity of their residual deficits after polio. I am only aware of one other large prospective study on polio from the Netherlands that over a 6 year period found similar results (Nollet F. et. Al. Perceived health and physical functioning in postpoliomyelitis syndrome: a 6-year prospective follow-up study. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 84(7):1048-56, 2003).

You may very well be correct that there is a subset of subjects that do more poorly than the group as a whole. Our polio cohort, as a whole, was fairly normally distributed in their magnitude of change over the course of the study. The majority of our cohort had only a modest decline in strength, however, there was a small minority that changed more and a small minority that didn’t change at all. In our cohort we did not identify any baseline variables that predicted the rate of change. Predictor variables may exist but we did not identify any.
I am not sure how to comment on this point. We have not presented any data with an intent to mislead or misrepresent.
I do not believe that anyone who sees polio patients questions the existence of the post-polio syndrome. I have not made any such claims. I believe the controversy is over our theory that the normal process of aging may be the root cause. It is true that we did not include a normal aging control group at the onset of our cohort study and this remains our speculation. A normal age matched control group has not been done in any previous long term study of polio survivors that I am aware of. This theory however has been erroneously interpreted that we are suggesting that polio survivors are merely getting older. In contrast, we propose that there is an attritional loss of motor neurons, muscle mass and strength in normal subjects. Because normal subjects have a considerable reserve capacity, they are not aware of these effects. Polio survivors however, who have already lost a number of motor neurons, no longer have that reserve capacity and the same attritional loss in them results in larger problems and progressive weakness. This would explain why those who with the largest residual deficits are more likely to be symptomatic; and why the polio group as a whole appears to decline in a relatively normally distributed fashion.
The issues related to the reliability and validity of MMT are valid. Because of this we did not only complete the MMT but also completed quantitative strength tests using a series of strain gauges resulting in specific force measurements in the muscle groups tested. It is difficult to translate these force measurements into an overall global measure of strength which can be done and has been validated with the NDS-w scale (MMT). In looking at the quantitative force measurements the results were the same as those with the NDS-w scores providing internal validity to our findings.
As you point out responses to questionnaires can be misleading. One of the drawbacks of questionnaire research is the subjectivity and the interpretation of the respondent. We asked a number of questions including specific questions such as: What gait aids do you use? What braces or orthotics do you use? What modifications have you made to your home? Etc. to minimize the subjectivity and variability of the respondents.
You are correct that it is often difficult to assess the extent of polio survivors residual effects by talking to or merely observing them. I am often struck by how polio survivors have adapted to their deficits. This is why it was important that we did our timed functional tasks, strength testing and electrophysiology testing at baseline and followed the group prospectively. Otherwise it is very difficult to determine this in a retrospective fashion. Even our baseline assessments were years after maximal recovery in all cases. What the polio subjects’ true maximal recovery was cannot be known for certain, and must be inferred.
I am sorry if our work has provided you or your colleagues difficulty or distress, none was intended.

Sincerely,

Eric J. Sorenson, MD Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905

END

Polio Survivors throw doubt on Study | Hilary Boone [PDF 157KB] | Minor Revisions 11th November 2006.
https://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/poliosurvivorsdoubtstudy.pdf

Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors Read More »

Rebuttal

Examining a Controversial PPS Publication

Marcia Falconer, Ph.D.

Professor Edward Bollenbach

Recently a controversial article, “Electrophysiological findings in a cohort of old polio survivors” by Sorenson, Daube and Windebank was published in the Journal of the Peripheral Nervous  System, volume 11, pages 241-246, September 2006. The findings in this article are the subject  of heated discussion in the PPS world. Below we examine this article.

A scientific article usually is divided into parts; an abstract, which gives a brief overview of the  article; the introduction, where related findings are discussed; the methods, which tell how the  work was done; the results, which tell what was found in the study and the discussion in which  the results are put into context with previous findings. In this final section the authors can  speculate on wider implications of their findings.

The discussion section is often the source of intellectual debate. On occasion this debate can  be vigorous, particularly when data from different studies point toward very different conclusions.  Science would not be science if it was not exciting and controversial. We can expect scientists  to have honest disagreements about methods, results and especially the discussion section of a  paper. Unfortunately the debate is sometimes removed from the scientific arena to the public  one when the popular press, or the internet, seizes upon an idea or a statement in the article.

This appears to be the case in the article by Sorenson et. al. In particular, one statement in the  discussion section has been sensationalized. The statement is: “This suggests that the most  likely cause for the decline in our polio survivors is aging alone.” It is easy to understand why  this sentence was highlighted. Taken out of context, this statement can infer that Post-Polio  Syndrome (PPS) does not exist. It can even be interpreted, incorrectly, to mean that people with  PPS are no worse off than their similarly aged peers with all this implies. Taken within the  context of the reported data, the statement does not mean any of this.

This study is based upon two electrophysiological studies with the results explained using  statistical methods and models. It is complex for the layperson to read and understand but it  was not designed for the general reader. It is designed to pass specific data to people working  in the field who are conversant with the methods and the interpretations of this data. We present  here a less technical, but still scientifically accurate, summary of the main points in this paper.

In this study, the muscle strength and symptoms of 38 people with a history of prior paralytic  polio were studied at 5 year intervals for 15 years. Innervation to two muscle groups, the thenar  muscle at the base of the thumb and the digitorum brevis muscle on the sole of the foot, was  examined using two electrophysiological measurements. One technique, CMAP (compound  muscle action potential), examines the maximum amount of muscle contraction that can be  achieved. The second technique, MUNE, (motor unit number estimate) provides information  about the number of motor units in that muscle. A motor unit is a group of muscle fibers for  which the message to contract is carried by a single neuron coming from the anterior horn of the  spinal column. Both techniques indicate the functionality of the nerve that is tested.

1

Examining a Controversial PPS Publication 

The underlying cause of Post-Polio Syndrome remains unknown. Current theories include  chronic inflammation of the spinal cord and die-back of recovered neurons from overuse. The  “die-back hypothesis” suggests that fragile neuronal sprouts (which reinnervate muscles after  the loss of neurons during acute polio) die because of metabolic stress caused by overuse.  These two suggested origins for PPS are not necessarily contradictory but rather examples of  different levels of observation; one at the tissue level, the other at the cellular level.

31 of the 38 people in the Sorenson study indicated they have PPS and experienced  progressive muscle weakness during the 15 year period. 7 did not have PPS symptoms and did  not experience this. It was found that the amount a muscle could contract (CMAP  measurements) declined equally in people with PPS symptoms and people without symptoms.  The number of motor units that could be activated (MUNE measurements) declined in both  groups, but, oddly, there was a greater decline in people who did not report new muscle  weakness! Since increasing weakness is associated with increasing loss of nerve connections  to motor units, clarification or discussion of this unexpected result would be good.

A significant flaw in this article is the use of results derived from another study with different  methods. It is acceptable to discuss and compare results from different studies. It is not  acceptable to use the results of others to replace missing elements of your own study. This is  particularly true when different methods were used to obtain the results. The authors did exactly  this in the most provocative part of the publication. Because this study does not have a ‘normal  control group’, the authors took the results from another, undefined study, with different  methodology, to get data about people who did not have polio. They then compared the results  from their electrophysiology study on polio survivors with the results from this undocumented  study. By doing this, their comparison of the effects of aging in polio survivors and normal  people is meaningless.

It is clear that the statements causing most concern to people with PPS are the ones least  supported by the evidence. Unfortunately, these statements also are the ones most likely to be  picked up and sensationalized. They are, in the authors’ own words, “…the similarity of our  results suggests that our polio cohort did not age any differently than a normal population. This  suggests that the most likely cause for the decline in our polio survivors is aging alone.” To  make a statement with such import, the data that supports it must be impeccable. It is not.  Without appropriate data the conclusion is unfounded and inflammatory.

Saying that “the most likely cause for the decline in our polio survivors is aging alone” invites  many questions. For example, all polio survivors age, but not all polio survivors report an  accelerated decline. What about them? What about young people, from the less developed  world where polio is still endemic? They are reporting symptoms of PPS and they are not at the  point where age causes loss of neurons. To ascribe aging as the main cause of PPS new  muscle weakness ignores the other severe problem of PPS – central fatigue – which has no  obvious connection to aging.

Indeed, to say that the decline is due to aging alone also suggests that the aging process is the  root cause of PPS. This is a gigantic leap and ignores documented differences between similar  aged polio survivors who have PPS and those who do not. Specifically, the profile of  proinflammatory cytokines is significantly different in the two groups (Gonzalez et. al. J. Neurol.  Sci. [2002] 205: 9-13), as is the presence or absence of poliovirus fragments in cerebrospinal  fluid (Leparc-Goffart et. al. J Clin Microbiol [1996] 34: 2023-2026). Neither of these is typical of  an aging population.

2

Examining a Controversial PPS Publication 

In addition, the Sorenson et. al. citation of work by McComas et. al. is perplexing. McComas  disagrees about aging being the most likely cause of new weakness. Indeed, actually says the  opposite. To quote from McComas et. al. “…denervation progresses in patients with prior  poliomyelitis …and …this progression is more rapid than that occurring in normal aging.”  (McComas et. al. Brain [1977] 120, 1415-1421).

The data in the current study shows that people with prior polio lost motor units at 3% per year.  In the McComas article people with prior polio lost motor units at the rate of 6.7% per year and  people without prior polio lost motor units at half this rate. Sorenson et. al. then say that “The  rate of decline in our polio cohort was approximately the same as the normal population in the  McComas study but about half that in their polio patients.” It is not clear why this statement is  included. It appears the authors are saying that the decline in the polio group in their study is the  same as the decline in the normal population of the McComas study and this supports their  contention that PPS weakness is due to normal aging. However they are comparing apples and  oranges – results from two different studies. Moreover, the two studies came to diametrically  opposed conclusions about PPS weakness and aging.

Another controversial part of the article is the suggestion by Sorenson et. al. that there are two  models to explain new muscle weakness in PPS. One is “linear loss” where the loss of neurons  (and hence of strength) is a constant rate of decline for everyone as happens in normal aging.  The other model is “proportional decline” where the loss is related to the amount of damage  from acute polio. In the discussion, the authors say that the proportional model best explains  their findings. However the authors also say that neither model closely fits their data! This  strongly suggests that neither model is correct. Therefore, the pattern for new muscle weakness  is not related to a slow general loss (as is found in everybody with aging) and it is not (solely)  related to the amount of original paralysis. There are other rate laws which could describe the  way new muscle weakness is appearing. It might have been illustrative if these had been  explored. It appears that the model preferred by the authors does not support their hypothesis  that muscle weakness (loss) is related to normal aging (the first model).

Sorenson et. al. tell us that “The large degree of variation seen in both models may be a  reflection of the underlying variation known to occur with most MUNE techniques available  currently.” This means that the method used to obtain this data may not be adequate for the job  asked of it. In other words, be a bit skeptical about the results.

On a different topic, the authors say that “There was no association between the magnitude of  decline in either the summated CMAP amplitude or the summated MUNE and the presence of  symptomatic progression.” One interpretation of this data is that a decline in the function of the  two muscles they tested does not correlate with symptoms of new muscle weakness elsewhere  in the body. If there is a significant relationship between the muscles tested and those generally  reported as becoming weaker, this should be demonstrated or referenced.

This article is controversial not because of its actual findings, but because of the interpretation  of its findings. The authors were poorly served by reviewers whose job was to point out all of the  inconsistencies described above. This article has many statements that are not supported by  the evidence. Unfortunately the popular press found a critical one and sensationalized it.

Address Correspondence to marcia.falconer@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk  PDF produced by the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network. 

Published August 27, 2006. 

http://www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk/downloads/extra/rebuttal.pdf

3

Examining a Controversial PPS Publication 

Marcia Falconer – Ph.D. in neuronal cell biology from University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.  Post-doctoral study in molecular biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,  Mass. Led virology laboratory with biotechnology applications at the Centre for Food and Animal  Research, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa. Also holds M.Sc. in cell biology from Carleton University,

Ottawa, Canada and B.Sc. from Simmons College, Boston, Mass. Speaker at many PPS  conferences and meetings in Canada, Australia and Britain. Now retired, she researches and  writes about Post-Polio Syndrome. Has numerous publications in peer-reviewed journals and on  the Web. She is currently writing a book about inflammation and PPS.

Contact information: marcia.falconer@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

Edward Bollenbach – Emeritus Professor of Biology. Full Professor of Biology since the age of  39, won first Educational Excellence and Distinguished Service Award in the Connecticut  Community College System, Specialized in the Teaching of Microbiology and Chemistry at  Northwestern CT. Community College for 32 years. Holds a Master of Arts in Biology from the  State University of New York at New Paltz, New York, and graduate certificates in Cryptogamic  Botany, Origins of Life, and Holistic Health. He currently writes about and researches the Post

Polio Syndrome and has several articles in print and on the Web.

Contact information: edward.bollenbach@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

4

Rebuttal Read More »

EFNS Guideline on diagnosis and management of post-polio syndrome

EFNS Guideline on diagnosis and management of post-polio syndrome.

Report of an EFNS Task Force on Post-polio Syndrome.

Farbu E’, Barnes MP, Driessen A?, Borg K4, de Visser M, Howard R”, Nollet F1, Opara Jo, Stalberg E”, Gilhus NE

‘Dept. of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, N 5021 Bergen, Norway, elisabeth,farbu@helse-bergen.no

-Academic Unit of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hunters Moor Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4NR, UK

Lt. Gen. Van Heutzlaan 6, 3743 JN Baarn, The Netherlands

“Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Intitutet/Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stochkholm Sweden

Dept. of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Dept. of Neurology, St. Thomas Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK

Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

8Repty Rehab Centre, ul. Sniadeckio 1, PL 42-604 Tarnowskie Góry, Poland

Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden

Correspondence to: E. Farbu

Abstract

Post-polio syndrome (PPS) is characterised by new or increased muscular

weakness, atrophy, muscle pain and fatigue several years after acute polio. PPS is

a clinical diagnosis with no specific tests, and a careful investigation is needed to

rule out other possible causes for the new symptoms. The Task Force suggests

exact criteria for PPS.

When evaluating therapeutic interventions, we find that muscular training, both

isokinetic and isometric is a safe and effective way to prevent further decline for

patients with moderate weakness, and can be recommended at level B. Muscular

training can also improve muscular fatigue, muscle weakness, and pain. Training

in a warm climate and non-swimming water exercises are particularly useful. At

level B we also recommend respiratory muscle training, which can improve

pulmonary function. Recognition of respiratory impairment and early introduction

of non-invasive ventilatory aids prevent or delay further respiratory decline and

the need of invasive respiratory aids. Group training, regular follow-ups, and

patient education are useful for the patients’ mental status and well being.

Weight loss, adjustment and introduction of properly fitted assistive devices are

regarded as good practice points, but lack proper scientific evidence. Steroids and

acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have no place in the treatment of PPS.

As there is limited data about effects and treatment of pain, future randomised

studies of therapeutic interventions should particularly address the potential effect

on this symptom, which is commonly reported by PPS patients. There is also a

need for studies evaluating the long-term effects of muscular training.

Objectives

The number of new cases of acute paralytic polio has fallen rapidly during the last

decade due to vaccination campaigns. Still, there are several patients with

previous paralytic polio worldwide, experiencing new symptoms and functional

decline later in life. The term post-post polio syndrome (PPS) has been used to

cover many of the symptoms reported by previous polio patients (Dalakas 1995;

Borg 1996; Halstead and Rossi 1985). A Task Force on Post-polio syndrome

under the auspices of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)

was set up in 2002. The aim was to make a common definition of PPS and

evaluate the existing evidence for the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic

interventions and on this basis provide clinical guidelines for management of PPS.

Background

Many previous polio patients experience new muscle weakness, new atrophy,

fatigue, muscular and joint pain, and cold intolerance several years after acute

paralytic poliomyelitis. A case of new atrophy and weakness several years after

acute paralytic polio was first described in 1875 by Raymond (Raymond 1875).

The term post-polio syndrome (PPS) was introduced by Halstead in 1985 to cover

medical, orthopaedic, and psychological problems possibly or indirectly related to

the long term disability occurring many years after the acute episode. The criteria

for PPS were:

1) Confirmed history of polio

2) Partial or fairly complete neurological and functional recovery after

the acute episode

3) Period of at least 15 years with neurological and functional stability

4) Two or more of the following health problems occurring after the

stable period: – extensive fatigue, muscle and/or joint pain, new

weakness in muscles previously affected or unaffected, new muscle

atrophy, functional loss, cold intolerance

5) No other medical explanation found (Halstead and Rossi 1985).

Halstead revised these criteria in 1991 and added “gradual or abrupt onset of new

neurogenic weakness” as an necessary criterion for PPS, with or without other co

existing symptoms (Halstead 1991).

Dalakas redefined and narrowed the use of PPS in 1995. He combined the criteria

for post-polio muscular atrophy (PPMA), i.e. new muscular atrophy at least 15

years after the acute infection, and the following symptoms: fatigue and decreased

endurance, increase in skeletal deformities, and pain in joints (Dalakas 1995). A

third term, post-polio muscular dysfunction (PPMD), was introduced in 1996 with

the following criteria:

1) History of paralytic polio, confirmed or not confirmed; partial or fairly

complete functional recovery

2) After a period of functional stability of at least 15 years development

of new muscle dysfunction: muscle weakness, muscle atrophy, muscle

pain, fatigue

3) Neurological examination compatible with prior polio: lower motor

neurone lesion; decreased or absent tendon reflexes; no sensory loss;

compatible findings on EMG and/or MRI (Borg 1996).

The symptoms reported for PPS are the same from all parts of the world. Muscle

weakness, atrophy, generalised fatigue, post-exercise fatigue, muscle pain,

fasciculations, cramps, cold intolerance, and joint pain dominate (Jubelt and Agre

2000; Ivanyi et al. 1999; Farbu and Gilhus 2001; Farbu and Gilhus 2002; Rekand

et al. 2004; Halstead and Rossi 1985; Farbu et al. 2003; Chang and Huang 2001;

Takemura et al. 2004). A history of previous paralytic polio seems to increase

long term mortality (Nielsen et al. 2003).

The prevalence of PPS has been reported from 15-80% of all patients with

previous polio depending on the criteria applied and population studied (Farbu et

  1. 2003;Ivanyi et al. 1999;Burger and Marincek 2000;Dalakas 1995;Halstead and

Rossi 1987;Halstead 1998; Ramlow et al. 1992).

For symptomatic treatment and clinical purposes the difference between stable

muscle weakness after polio and PPS often remains insignificant. Still, it would

be of great benefit to have a consensus on the term PPS, both for clinical use, but

also for research. All three definitions are based on the principle of exclusion of

other causes for new deterioration and symptoms. Halstead claimed that two

different symptoms, like joint pain and cold intolerance, was sufficient for a

diagnosis of PPS, but redefined and included new muscle weakness as an

obligatory criterion for the diagnosis. Dalakas proposed an even more focused

neuromuscular approach where new atrophy was the cornerstone. Still, many

patients report a sense of weakening in the muscles before it is detectable by

clinical examination as new atrophy. These findings can be confirmed by

isometric muscle strength evaluation and computer tomography imaging (Ivanyi

et al. 1998;Lygren et al. 2004). Atrophy is the end stage of new neuromuscular

deterioration and by using this as an necessary criterion, patients in an earlier

stage of neuromuscular deterioration will be excluded. In principle, the revised

Halstead criteria and Borg’s PPMD definition give the same description of PPS

We suggest that the criteria for PPS used within EFNS and Europe should be

based on these two definitions with emphasis on the new muscle weakness. The

diagnosis of PPS is an exclusion diagnosis with no test or analysis specific for

PPS, and the role of the investigation is to rule out every other possible cause for

the new symptoms and clinical deterioration.

Role of clinical neurophysiology

These techniques are used for four main reasons. First, to establish a picture

typical of lower motor neurone involvement (neurogenic EMG findings, normal

sensory findings, and normal motor findings except for parameters reflecting

muscle atrophy). Second, to exclude other causes of the symptoms. This is part of

the PPS definition, and it is not uncommon to find patients in whom the initial

diagnosis of polio must be revised. Third, to find concomitant nerve or muscle

disorders, such as entrapments and radiculopathies. Fourth, to assess the degree of

motor neurone loss. This cannot be quantified clinically, since loss of neurones

may be completely masked by compensatory nerve sprouting and muscle fibre

hypertrophy. Macro EMG studies have shown that loss of up to 50% of neurones

may be compatible with a normal clinical picture (Stalberg and Grimby 1995).

In longitudinal studies with macro EMG a continuous loss of neurones takes

place with exaggerated speed compared to normal age dependent degeneration

(Grimby et al. 1998). New weakness appears when the compensatory mechanisms

are no longer sufficient, and occurs when less than 10-20% of the neurones

remain.

Search strategy

Medline via Pubmed, EMBASE, ISI, and Cochrane were searched with time

limits 1966 until present. Search terms were post-polio

syndrome/postpoliomyelitis/PPMA/PPMD/poliomyelitis in combination with

management, therapy, treatment, medicaments, physiotherapy, and intervention.

No meta-analyses of intervention in PPS were found when searching the

databases.

Data were classified according to their scientific level of evidence (Brainin et al.

2004)

The classification for evidence levels for health care interventions are the

following:

la: Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Ib: Evidence obtained from at least one randomised controlled trial

Ila: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed, controlled, but not

randomised study

IIb: Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well-designed quasi

experimental study in which implementation of an intervention is outside the

control of the investigators, but an opportunity exists to evaluate its effect)

III: Evidence obtained from well-designed, non-experimental descriptive studies,

such as comparative studies, correlation studies and case studies

IV: Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical

experience of respected authorities

The classification of grades for recommendations are:

A: Requires at least one randomised controlled trial as part of a body literature of

overall good quality and consistency addressing the specific recommendation

(Evidence level la, lb)

B: Requires the availability of well conducted studies but not randomised

evidence on the topic of the recommendation (Evidence level IIa, IIb, III)

C: Requires the evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions

and/or clinical experiences of respected authorities. Indicates an absence of

directly applicable studies of good quality (Evidence level IV)

A survey of questions about diagnosis, management, and care of post-polio

patients was answered by the group members from five different European

countries.

Results

National surveys

None of the nations represented in this task force had formal national guidelines

for PPS, neither for diagnosis nor treatment. Diagnostic criteria applied were

those of Halstead (Sweden), Borg (the Netherlands), and Dalakas (Norway).

There were no national competence centres in any of the countries. Medical

specialities involved were mainly physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology,

clinical neurophysiology, respiratory medicine, and orthopaedics. Neurologists

were involved in diagnosis whereas rehabilitation physicians were involved in

long term management and care. In UK, PPS patients were mainly taken care of

by their general practitioners with less contact with the secondary level of the

health service.

Therapeutic interventions

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, steroids, and amantadine

The effect of pyridostigmine in PPS has been investigated in four studies with

particular emphasis on the aspects fatigue, muscular strength, and quality of life.

Two open pilot studies indicated a positive effect on fatigue (Trojan and Cashman

1995), but this was not confirmed in two double-blinded randomised controlled

trials (Horemans et al. 2003;Trojan et al. 1999). Horemans et al. reported a

significant improvement in walking performance, but the difference in quadriceps

strength was not significant as reported by Trojan et al. Hence, there is evidence

at level Ib that pyridostigmine is not effective in the management of fatigue and

muscular strength in PPS. There are two randomised placebo controlled studies

investigating the effect of high dose prednisolone and amantandine on muscular

strength and muscular fatigue (Dinsmore et al. 1995; Stein et al. 1995). Both were

negative with no symptom improvement.

Muscular training

It has been claimed that muscular overuse and training may worsen the symptoms

in PPS and even provoke a further loss of muscular strength. (Bennett and

Knowlton 1958). Many post-polio patients have been advised to avoid muscular

overuse and intensive training (March of Dimes 2000; Halstead and Gawne

1996). Studies of muscle morphology and oxidative capacity in the tibialis

anterior muscle indicate a high muscular activity due to gait and weight bearing

(Borg and Henriksson 1991; Grimby et al. 1996). Macro MUP (macro EMG

motor unit potential) amplitude in the tibialis anterior muscle was found to be

increased after five years, whereas there was no change in the Macro MUP

amplitude in the biceps brachii muscle (Sandberg and Stalberg 2004). This

indicates a more pronounced denervation-reinnervation process in the tibialis

muscle compared to the biceps muscle and it is speculated whether this is due to

daily use and higher muscular activities in the leg muscles. However, none of

these studies have assessed the levels of activity. There are no prospective studies,

which show that increased muscular activity or muscle training lead to loss of

muscular strength compared to absence of training or less muscular activity. On

the contrary, patients who reported regular physical activity had less symptoms

and a higher functional level than physically inactive patients (Veicsteinas et al.

1998; Rekand et al. 2004). One randomised controlled trial reported significant

improvement in muscular strength after a 12 week training programme with

isometric contraction of hand muscles (Chan et al. 2003). Non-randomised trials

with training programmes lasting from six weeks to six months involving both

isokinetic, isometric and endurance muscular training have shown a significant

increase in both isokinetic and isometric muscle strength (Agre et al. 1997;

Einarsson 1991; Ernstoff et al. 1996; Spector et al. 1996). No complications or

side effects were reported. Hence, there is evidence at level Ib, also supported by

several trials at level IIb, that supervised training programmes increase muscle

strength in patients with post-polio syndrome. It should be added that the long

term effects (years) of training are not documented, but deserve more studies.

Aerobic walking exercises can help to economise movements and increase

endurance without improvement in cardiovascular fitness (Dean and Ross 1991).

Ernstoff et al. reported an increase in work performance by reduction of heart rate

during exercises, hence endurance training seems to improve cardiovascular

conditioning (level Ilb). One randomised controlled study of post-polio patients

with pain, weakness, and fatigue in their shoulder muscles compared the effect of

exercise only, exercise in combination with lifestyle modification, and lifestyle

modification only (Klein et al. 2002). All three groups improved after

intervention, but significant difference only for the groups with exercise. The

NO

endpoints in this study were combinations and addition of several symptoms.

Thus further studies are needed to identify improvement on particular symptoms

before conclusions are drawn regarding lifestyle modifications.

Treatment in a warm climate and training in water

Anecdotal reports from post-polio patients indicate a positive effect of a warm

climate and of training in warm water with respect to pain and fatigue. One

randomised controlled study reported a significant reduction in pain, health

related problems and depression for both groups after completing identical

training programmes in either Norway or Tenerife (Strumse et al. 2003). No

significant difference in walking tests was seen. Both groups improved their

walking skills, reduced their level of fatigue, depression, and health-related

problems. However, the effect remained significantly longer in the Tenerife

group.

Dynamic non-swimming water exercises for post-polio patients have been

reported to reduce pain, improve cardiovascular conditioning, and increase

subjective well-being in a controlled but not randomised study (level Ila) (Willen

et al. 2001). A qualitative interview study (level III) indicates a positive effect on

the self experience when performing group training in water (Willen and

Scherman 2002).

Respiratory aid

Reduced pulmonary function due to weak respiratory muscles and/or chest

deformities may occur in patients with previous polio (Howard et al. 1988; Kidd

et al. 1997). Patients with chest deformities have an increased risk of nocturnal

hypoventilation and sleep-disordered breathing. The prevalence of respiratory

impairment is highest among patients who were treated with artificial ventilation

in the acute phase (Howard et al. 1988). Shortness of breath is a common

complaint in many post-polio patients, but is not necessarily related to respiratory

impairment. Two hospital based studies reported that respiratory function was

normal in the majority of patients reporting shortness of breath, and

cardiovascular deconditioning and being overweight were the most common

cause for this symptom (Farbu et al. 2003; Stanghelle et al. 1993). Respiratory

impairment can occur without shortness of breath and can present with daytime

somnolence, morning headache, and fatigue (Dean et al. 1991). There are no

randomised trials evaluating the effect of respiratory aids. Reports indicate that

early introduction of non-invasive respiratory aids like intermittent positive

pressure ventilation (IPPV) or biphasic positive pressure (BIPAP) ventilators via

mouthpiece or nasal application can stabilise the situation and prevent

complications like chest infections, further respiratory decline and invasive

ventilatory aid (tracheostomy) (Bergholtz et al. 1988; Bach 1995), and also

improve exercise capacity (Vaz Fragoso et al. 1992)(evidence at level III). If

invasive ventilatory aid is needed, PPS patients with a tracheostomy and

mechanical home ventilation are reported to have good perceived health despite

severe physical disability (Markstrom et al. 2002)(level III). For patients already

using intermittent respiratory aids, respiratory muscle training is useful (Klefbeck

et al. 2000)(level IIb). General precautions like stopping smoking, mobilisation of

secretions, and cough assistance are beneficial (Bergholtz et al. 1988).

Bulbar symptoms

Weakening of bulbar muscles causing dysphagia, weakness of voice, and vocal

changes have been reported among patients with PPS (Abaza et al. 2001; Driscoll

et al. 1995; Sonies and Dalakas 1991; Ivanyi et al. 1994). Case reports indicate

that speech therapy and laryngeal muscle training are useful for these patients

(evidence at level III) (Abaza et al. 2001).

Weight control, assistive devices, and lifestyle modifications

The importance of reducing weight, adaptation to assistive devices and

modification of activities of daily living have been emphasised by many

authorities in this field (Halstead et al. 1995; Jubelt and Agre 2000; Thorsteinsson

1997; March of Dimes 2000). The scientific evidence for these recommendations

is limited, but there was consensus in our group that an individual with weak

muscles benefits from losing excess weight, and that proper orthoses, walking

sticks, and wheelchairs facilitate daily life activities. Participating in muscle

training programmes and endurance training will, in many cases, also lead to

weight loss, but there is no evidence that weight reduction alone can ameliorate

symptoms. Patients with BMI (body mass index) > 25 which is defined as

overweight, did not report more symptoms than those of normal weight (Farbu et

  1. 2003). However, sleep disorders are common amongst PPS patients (Farbu et
  2. 2003), and can be a mix of obstructive sleep apnoea, frequency of tiredness on

waking up and during the day, headache on waking up, daytime sleepiness,

restless legs, and hypoventilation (Hsu and Staats 1998; Steljes et al. 1990;Van Kralingen et al. 1996). It is widely accepted that obesity is related to obstructive

sleep apnoea, and weight control is crucial for this disorder (Gami et al. 2003).

The number of patients receiving mechanical home ventilation because of

obesity-induced hypoventilation has increased (Janssens et al. 2003). From this

perspective, there is a rationale for reducing excess weight in PPS patients (level

III).

One pilot study reported that a change from metal braces to light weight carbon

orthoses can be useful and increase walking ability in polio patients with new

pareses (Heim et al. 1997). Biomechanical analysis of the walking pattern can

lead to optimal design of orthoses and improve function in the lower limbs (level

  1. IV) (Perry and Clark 1997).

Frequent periods of rest, energy conservation, and work simplification skills are

thought to be useful for patients with fatigue who are not used to such techniques

in advance (Packer et al. 1991).

Coming to terms with new disabilities, educational interventions

New loss of function, increase in disability and handicap are common in post

polio patients (Ivanyi et al. 1999; Farbu et al. 2003; Nollet et al. 1999). This can

lead to reduced well-being and emotional stress. Group training with other post

polio patients, participation and regular follow-up at post-polio clinics can prevent

a decline in mental status and give a more positive experience of the “self”

(Stanghelle and Festvag 1997; Willen and Scherman 2002)(level III). Acceptance

of assistive devices, environmental support and spending more time on daily tasks

can facilitate with coping of home and occupational life (level III) (Thoren

Jonsson 2001).

Recommendations

Level A:

Steroids and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have no place in the treatment of post

polio patients.

Level B:

Muscular training, both isokinetic and isometric, is a safe and effective way to

prevent further decline of muscle strength in slightly or moderately weak muscle

groups and can even reduce symptoms of muscular fatigue, muscle weakness, and

pain in post-polio patients. There are no studies exploring the effect of muscular

training in patients with severe weakness and the long-term effects of such

training is not yet explored.

Training in a warm climate and non-swimming water exercises are particularly

useful.

Respiratory muscle training can improve pulmonary function.

Recognition of respiratory impairment and early introduction of non-invasive

ventilatory aids prevent or delay further respiratory decline and the need of

invasive respiratory aids.

Group training, regular follow-ups, and patient education are useful for the

patients’ mental status and well-being.

Level C:

Weight loss, and adjustment and introduction of properly fitted assistive devices

are good practice points, but lack significant scientific evidence.

Time for new revision of guidelines

There are now ongoing studies evaluating the effect of immune modulating

therapy in post-polio syndrome (Gonzalez et al. 2004). The results will probably

be ready within the next two years. A revision of these guidelines would be useful

at the same time. Prospective follow-up studies evaluating muscle strength and

function during the natural course of the disorder is welcomed. Studies evaluating

the effects of muscular training in patients with severe muscular weakness are

needed, in addition to prospective studies evaluating the long-term effects of

muscular training. Further randomised studies evaluating therapeutic interventions

should be performed with particular emphasis on pain and fatigue as these are

common and disabling symptoms and there is limited evidence that any

intervention can effect these symptoms.

Conflicts of interests

There are no conflicts of interests in this paper.

Reference List

Abaza M. M., Sataloff R. T., Hawkshaw M. J., and Mandel S. (2001) Laryngeal

manifestations of postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Journal of Voice 15, 291-294.

Agre J. C., Rodriquez A. A., and Franke T. M. (1997) Strength, endurance, and

work capacity after muscle strengthening exercise in postpolio subjects. Archives

of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 78, 681-686.

Bach J. R. (1995) Management of post-polio respiratory sequelae. Annals of the

New York Academy of Sciences 753, 96-102.

Bennett R. L. and Knowlton G. C. (1958) Overwork weakness in partially

denervated skeletal muscle. Clinical Orthopedics 15, 22-29.

Bergholtz B., Mollestad S. O., and Refsum H. (1988) [Post-polio respiratory

failure. New manifestations of a forgotten disease]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 108,

2474-2475.

Borg K. (1996) Post-polio muscle dysfunction 29th ENMC workshop 14-16

October 1994, Naarden, the Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord 6, 75-80.

Borg K. and Henriksson J. (1991) Prior poliomyelitis-reduced capillary supply

and metabolic enzyme content in hypertrophic slow-twitch (type I) muscle fibres.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 54, 236-240.

Brainin M., Barnes M., Baron J.-C., Gilhus N. E., Hughes R., Selmaj K., and

Waldemar G. (2004) Guidance for the preparation of neurological managment

guidelines by EFNS scientific task forces – revised recommendations 2004.

European Journal of Neurology 11, 1-6.

Burger H. and Marincek C. (2000) The influence of post-polio syndrome on

independence and life satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil 22, 318-322.

Chan K. M., Amirjani N., Sumrain M., Clarke A., and Strohschein F. J. (2003)

Randomized controlled trial of strength training in post-polio patients. Muscle &

Nerve 27, 332-338.

Chang C.-W. and Huang S.-F. (2001) Varied clinical patterns, physical activities,

muscle enzymes, electromyographic and histologic findings in patients with post

polio syndrome in Taiwan. Spinal Cord 39, 526-531.

Dalakas M. C. (1995) The post-polio syndrome as an evolved clinical entity.

Definition and clinical description. Ann N Y Acad Sci 753, 68-80.

Dean E. and Ross J. (1991) Effect of modified aerobic training on movement

energetics in polio survivors. Orthopedics 14, 1243-1246.

Dean E., Ross J., Road D. J., Courtenay L., and Madill K. J. (1991) Pulmonary

function in individuals with a history of poliomyelitis. Chest 100, 118-123.

Dinsmore S., Dambrosia J., and Dalakas M. C. (1995) A double-blind, placebo

mo

controlled trial of high-dose prednisone for the treatment of post-poliomyelitis

syndrome. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 753, 303-313.

Driscoll B. P., Gracco C., Coelho C., Goldstein J., Oshima K., Tierney E., and

Sasaki C. T. (1995) Laryngeal function in postpolio patients. Laryngoscope 105,

35-41.

Einarsson G. (1991) Muscle conditioning in late poliomyelitis. Archives of

Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 72, 11-14.

Ernstoff B., Wetterqvist H., Kvist H., and Grimby G. (1996) Endurance training

effect on individuals with postpoliomyelitis. Archives of Physical Medicine &

Rehabilitation 77, 843-848.

Farbu E. and Gilhus N. E. (2001) Polio as a socioeconomic and health factor. A

paired sibling study. J of Neurol 249, 404-409.

Farbu E. and Gilhus N. E. (2002) Education, occupation, and perception of health

amongst previous polio patients compared to their siblings. Eur J Neurol 9, 233

241.

Farbu E., Rekand T., and Gilhus N. E. (2003) Post polio syndrome and total

health status in a prospective hospital study. Eur J Neurol 10, 407-413.

Gami A. S., Caples S. M., and Somers V. K. (2003) Obesity and obstructive sleep

apnea. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 32, 869-894.

Gonzalez H., Khademi M., Andersson M., Piehl F., Wallstrom E., Borg K., and

Olsson T. (2004) Prior poliomyelitis-Ivig treatment reduces proinflammatory

cytokine production. J Neuroimmunol 150, 139-144.

Grimby G., Stalberg E., Sandberg A., and Sunnerhagen K. S. (1998) An 8-year

longitudinal study of muscle strength, muscle fiber size, and dynamic

electromyogram in individuals with late polio. Muscle & Nerve . 21, 1428-1437.

Grimby L., Tollback A., Muller U., and Larsson L. (1996) Fatigue of chronically

overused motor units in prior polio patients. Muscle & Nerve 19, 728-737.

Halstead L. S. (1991) Assessment and differential diagnosis for post-polio

syndrome. Orthopedics 14, 1209-1217.

Halstead L. S. (1998) Post-polio syndrome. Sci Am 278, 42-47.

Halstead L. S. and Gawne A. C. (1996) NRH proposal for limb classification and

exercise prescription. Disability & Rehabilitation 18, 311-316.

Halstead L. S., Gawne A. C., and Pham B. T. (1995) National rehabilitation

hospital limb classification for exercise, research, and clinical trials in post-polio

patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 753, 343-353.

Halstead L. S. and Rossi C. D. (1985) New problems in old polio patients: results

of a survey of 539 polio survivors. Orthopedics 8, 845-850.

Halstead L. S. and Rossi C. D. (1987) Post-polio syndrome: clinical experience

with 132 consecutive outpatients. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 23, 13-26.

Heim M., Yaacobi E., and Azaria M. (1997) A pilot study to determine the

efficiency of lightweight carbon fibre orthoses in the management of patients

suffering from post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Clinical Rehabilitation 11, 302-305.

Horemans H. L. D., Nollet F., Beelen A., Drost G., Stegeman D. F., Zwarts M. J.,

Bussmann J. B. J., De Visser M., and Lankhorst G. J. (2003) Pyridostigmine in

postpolio syndrome: No decline in fatigue and limited functional improvement.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 74, 1655-1661.

Howard R. S., Wiles C. M. and Spencer G. T. (1988) The late sequelae of

poliomyelitis. Q J Med 66, 219-232.

Hsu A. A. and Staats B. A. (1998) ‘Postpolio’ sequelae and sleep-related

disordered breathing. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 73, 216-224.

Ivanyi B., Nollet F., Redekop W. K., De Haan R., Wohlgemuht M., Van

Wijngaarden J. K., and De Visser M. (1999) Late onset polio sequelae:

Disabilities and handicaps in a population-based cohort of the 1956 poliomyelitis

outbreak in the Netherlands. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation . 80,

687-690.

Ivanyi B., Phoa S. S., and de V.M. (1994) Dysphagia in postpolio patients: a

videofluorographic follow-up study. Dysphagia 9, 96-98.

Ivanyi B., Redekop W., De Jongh R., and De Visser M. (1998) Computed

tomographic study of the skeletal musculature of the lower body in 45 postpolio

patients. Muscle & Nerve . 21, 540-542.

Janssens J.-P., Derivaz S., Breitenstein E., De Muralt B., Fitting J.-W., Chevrolet

J.-C., and Rochat T. (2003) Changing patterns in long-term noninvasive

ventilation: A 7-year prospective study in the Geneva Lake Area. Chest 123, 67

79.

Jubelt B. and Agre J. C. (2000) Characteristics and management of postpolio

syndrome. JAMA 284, 412-414.

Kidd D., Howard R. S., Williams A. J., Heatley F. W., Panayiotopoulos C. P., and

Spencer G. T.(1997) Late functional deterioration following paralytic

poliomyelitis. QJM 90, 189-196.

Klefbeck B., Lagerstrand L., and Mattsson E. (2000) Inspiratory muscle training

in patients with prior polio who use part-time assisted ventilation. Archives of

Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 81, 1065-1071.

Klein M. G., Whyte J., Esquenazi A., Keenan M. A., and Costello R. (2002) A

comparison of the effects of exercise and lifestyle modification on the resolution

of overuse symptoms of the shoulder in polio survivors: a preliminary study.

Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 83, 708-713.

Lygren H., Jones K. O., Grenstad T., Dreyer V., Farbu E., and Rekand T. (2004)

Disability, Fatigue, Pain and Muscle Strength in Poliosurvivors. Physiotherapy

submitted

March of Dimes (2000). March of Dimes International Conference on Post Polio

Syndrome. Identifying Best Practices in Diagnosis and Care. 2000.

Ref Type: Report

Markstrom A., Sundell K., Lysdahl M., Andersson G., Schedin U., and Klang B.

(2002) Quality-of-life evaluation of patients with neuromuscular and skeletal

diseases treated with noninvasive and invasive home mechanical ventilation.

Chest 122, 1695-1700.

Nielsen N. M., Rostgaard K., Juel K., Askgaard D., and Aaby P. (2003) Long

term mortality after poliomyelitis. Epidemiology 14, 355-360.

Nollet F., Beelen A., Prins M. H., De Visser M., Sargeant A. J., Lankhorst G. J.,

and De Jong B. A. (1999) Disability and functional assessment in former polio

patients with and without postpolio syndrome. Archives of Physical Medicine &

Rehabilitation 80, 136-143.

Packer T. L., Martins I., Krefting L., and Brouwer B. (1991) Activity and post

polio fatigue. Orthopedics 14, 1223-1226.

Perry J. and Clark D. (1997) Biomechanical abnormalities of post-polio patients

and the implications for orthotic management. Neurorehabilitation 8.

Ramlow J., Alexander M., LaPorte R., Kaufmann C., and Kuller L. (1992)

Epidemiology of the post-polio syndrome. Am J Epidemiol 136, 769-786.

Raymond M. (1875) Paralysie essentielle de l’enfance, atrophie musculaire

consécutive. C R Soc Biol 27, 158.

Rekand T., Korv J., Farbu E., Roose M., Gilhus N. E., Langeland N., and Aarli J.

  1. (2004) Lifestyle and late effects after poliomyelitis. A risk factor study of two

populations. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 109, 120-125.

Sandberg A. and Stalberg E. (2004) Changes in macro electromyography over

time in patients with a history of polio: a comparison of 2 muscles. Arch Phys

Med Rehabil 85, 1174-1182.

Sonies B. C. and Dalakas M. C. (1991) Dysphagia in patients with the post-polio

syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 324, 1162-1167.

Spector S. A., Gordon P. L., Feuerstein I. M., Sivakumar K., Hurley B. F., and

Dalakas M. C. (1996) Strength gains without muscle injury after strength training

in patients with postpolio muscular atrophy. Muscle & Nerve 19, 1282-1290.

Stalberg E. and Grimby G. (1995) Dynamic electromyography and muscle biopsy

changes in a 4-year follow-up: Study of patients with a history of polio. Muscle &

Nerve 18, 699-707.

Stanghelle J. K., Festvag L., and Aksnes A. K. (1993) Pulmonary function and

symptom-limited exercise stress testing in subjects with late sequelae of

poliomyelitis. Scand J Rehabil Med 25, 125-129.

Stanghelle J. K. and Festvag L. V. (1997) Postpolio syndrome: A 5 year follow

  1. Spinal Cord 35, 503-508.

Stein D. P., Dambrosia J. M., and Dalakas M. C. (1995) A double-blind, placebo

controlled trial of amantadine for the treatment of fatigue in patients with the

post-polio syndrome. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 753, 296-302.

Steljes D. G., Kryger M. H., Kirk B. W., and Millar T. W. (1990) Sleep in

postpolio syndrome. Chest 98, 133-140.

Strumse Y. A. S., Stanghelle J. K., Utne L., Ahlvin P., and Svendsby E. K. (2003)

Treatment of patients with postpolio syndrome in a warm climate. Disability &

Rehabilitation 25, 77-84.

Takemura J., Saeki S., Hachisuka K., and Aritome K. (2004) Prevalence of post

polio syndrome based on a cross-sectional survey in Kitakyushu, Japan. Journal

of Rehabilitation Medicine . 36.

Thoren-Jonsson A.-L. (2001) Coming to terms with the shift in one’s capabilities:

a study of the adaptive process in persons with poliomyelitis sequelae. Disability

& Rehabilitation 23, 341-351.

Thorsteinsson G. (1997) Management of postpolio syndrome. Mayo Clinic

Proceedings 72, 627-638.

Trojan D. A. and Cashman N. R. (1995) An open trial of pyridostigmine in post

poliomyelitis syndrome. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 22, 223-227.

Trojan D. A., Collet J.-P., Shapiro S., Jubelt B., Miller R. G., Agre J. C., Munsat

  1. L., Hollander D., Tandan R., Granger C., Robinson A., Finch L., Ducruet T.,

and Cashman N. R. (1999) A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded trial of

pyridostigmine in postpolio syndrome. Neurology 53, 1225-1233.

Van Kralingen K. W., Ivanyi B., Van Keimpema A. R. J., Venmans B.J. W., De

Visser M., and Postmus P. E. (1996) Sleep complaints in postpolio syndrome.

Vaz Fragoso C. A., Kacmarek R. M., and Systrom D. M. (1992) Improvement in

exercise capacity after nocturnal positive pressure ventilation and tracheostomy in

a postpoliomyelitis patient. Chest 101, 254-257.

Veicsteinas A., Sarchi P., Mattiotti S., Bignotto M., and Belleri M. (1998)

Cardiorespiratory and metabolic adjustments during submaximal and maximal

exercise in polio athletes. Medicina Dello Sport 51, 361-373.

Willen C. and Scherman M. H. (2002) Group training in a pool causes ripples on

the water: Experiences by persons with late effects of polio. Journal of

Rehabilitation Medicine 34, 191-197.

Willen C., Sunnerhagen K. S., and Grimby G. (2001) Dynamic water exercise in

AY

individuals with late poliomyelitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82, 66-72.

EFNS Guideline on diagnosis and management of post-polio syndrome Read More »

Bollenbach Polio Biology 12

Polio Biology XII

Genetics of the Post-Polio Syndrome

Eddie Bollenbach

A Lincolnshire Post-Polio Library Publication

24th January 2006

It has been a while since the last Polio Biology column and much has happened in the field of neurodegeneration since the last installment. It’s too bad we don’t have as much focused medical research that specifically targets the Post-Polio Syndrome, nevertheless we can learn much about ourselves from work occurring in the general field of neurodegeneration. Actually, in a very real sense, Post-Polio Syndrome is the result of neurodegeneration, or the loss of vitality, synaptic connections, and resilience of our motor neurons.

One of the facts about PPS that has always bothered me is the generally accepted cause of the syndrome as deriving from overuse. Two mental roadblocks for me in accepting this idea are:

  1. Only 40% (the most frequently seen number) to 20% of people who have had polio develop the syndrome with its new weakness, fatigue, pain, and variety of complications. It is logical to infer that if one had paralytic polio which resulted in residual weakness, one should develop PPS because we all overuse weak muscles innervated by too few neurons. In a survey by Marcia Falconer and me, soon to be published here at Lincolnshire, we found no difference in incidence of PPS, or severity of PPS, between polio survivor couch potatoes, or those who have worked hard physical jobs throughout their lives or participated in regular vigorous physical activity[1]. There have been other survey reports that have since supported this since our finding two years ago[2].
  2. Sometimes, it seems, people with severe initial damage escape PPS while others with less severe damage, even some who have had what was thought of as non-paralytic polio, succumb to PPS[3]. Since those with severe damage are weaker throughout life, overuse would be greater for their severely damaged neuromusculature.

In any event, late neurodegeneration must involve several steps. It is obvious that a prerequisite is a susceptibility to late spinal neurodegeneration. There is a very interesting study about late neurodegeneration, after physical damage to the spinal cord, published in 2003 entitled: “Discrete Gene Loci Regulate Neurodegeneration, Lymphocyte Infiltration, and Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Expression in the CNS”. The title is a mouthful. The rest of this installment will explain the significance of this article to our problems with PPS and to it’s possible treatment.

The above study involved the experimental destruction of motor neuron axons (referred to as avulsion of the ventral roots of the spinal cord) in two genetically different strains of rats. The authors also crossed the

two mating strains of rats and avulsed the offspring of these two mating types. Some rats developed a late neurodegeneration (as we with PPS) and some did not. The ones that did not had different genes in several areas of their chromosomal makeup which controlled immune responses in the spinal cord. The ones who did experience late degeneration had different genes in these locations.

RESULTS:

Four points (genes) on rat chromosomes labeled VRA1, VRA2, VRA3, and VRA4 acted to determine susceptibility to late neurodegeneration. Three of these loci determined whether or not immune cells (white blood cells or MHC II cells would present in the damaged areas after the original lesions healed). The corresponding (Synectic) locations on human chromosomes controlling a late immune reaction in the spinal cord after recovery are 8q12, 8q22.1, and 1p35.2-36.11, and 16p13. To explain the chromosomal notation there are 22 pairs of chromosomes along with a pair of sex chromosomes in the human. The first number, e.g., 8 above, indicates the gene is on chromosome number 8. The q designates that the location is on the long arm of the chromosome. Each chromosome has a narrow area called a centromere which separates a long arm from a short arm. The chromosomes are observed after they are stained and the second number, 12, designates the staining band when counted out from the centromere. The location 1p means the first chromosome’s short arm (p) and the numbers following indicates that the gene is within the bands 35.2-36.11.

Figure 1 Diagram of one human gene with its loci and designation criteria

(US Library of Medicine)

SIGNIFICANCE:

In the past three years researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden have demonstrated the presence of immune activity in the spinal cords of people suffering the Post-Polio Syndrome but not in patients who had polio with no late neurodegeneration. This immune activity was detected by the presence of immune chemicals derived from the same immune cells discussed earlier. Physicians at Karolinska have treated patients with intravenous immunoglobulin, which cleared the intrathecal space and spinal fluid of these immune chemokines and cytokines which directly attack motor neurons. Several patients treated with IVIg reported an increased vitality and quality of life, less pain and fatigue, and a general decrease in symptoms. [4, 5, 6, 7]. The work, which indicated a genetic basis for late neurodegeneration, strongly implies that late neurodegeneration is the result of T lymphocyte infiltration and macrophage type II instigation controlled by specific genes (which control the production of cytokines and chemokines, immune chemicals resulting from immune activation within the spine). I believe these two lines of inquiry outlined above fit nicely together to give us a picture of what may be happening inside the spinal cord ventral roots in Post-Polio Syndrome. If so, some unresolved questions about PPS are closer to resolution:

  1. Why does PPS only happen to some of us? (Because we are genetically different from one another.) 2. Why does it occur with different degrees of severity? (There are several genes at work that may differ.)
  2. And finally, can it ever be treated? It seems we can improve our lot by decreasing the immune activity in the spinal cord. Possibly through the use of drugs to diminish the cytokines found in PPS, or possibly by infusion of IvIg or a smaller defined antibody immunoglobulin as yet uncovered. Plainly, we can interrupt PPS by finding ways to turn off the effects of immune chemicals inside our spinal cords. If these ideas pan out PPS should be manageable in the near future.

References.

  1. Falconer, M. and Bollenbach, E. Survey results in process. Lincolnshire, 2006. 2. Rekand T; Kõrv J; Farbu E.; Roose M.; Gilhus N.E.; Langeland N.; Aarli J.A, “Lifestyle and late effects after poliomyelitis. A risk factor study of two populations” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Volume 109, Number 2, February 2004, pp. 120-125(6).[PubMed Abstract]
  2. Falconer, M. and Bollenbach, E. “Late Functional Loss in Non-Paralytic Polio”, Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jan-Feb; 79(1):19-23.[PubMed Abstract]
  3. Gonzalez, H. et al “Prior poliomyelitis – evidence of cytokine production in the central nervous system” J. Neurol Sci. 2002 Dec 15; 205(1); 9-13.[PubMed Abstract]
  4. Gonzalez, H. et al “Prior Poliomyelitis – IvIg treatment reduces proinflammatory cytokine production” J. Neuroimmunol. 2004 May; 150(1-2): 139-44.[PubMed Abstract]
  5. Kaponides, G. et al “The effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with post-polio syndrome – an uncontrolled pilot study. Submitted at the Karolinska Institute 2005. 7. Gonzalez, H. et al. “Intravenous immunoglobulin for the post-polio syndrome’; a randomized controlled trial. Submitted as PhD Thesis at the Karolinska Institute 2005

The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

Registered Charity No. 1064177

An Information Service for Polio Survivors and Medical Professionals

All enquiries, book requests, medical article requests, membership fees, items for newsletters and donations to

The Secretary, Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network

PO Box 954, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN5 5ER United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0)1522 888601

Facsimile: +44 (0)870 1600840

Email: info@lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

Web Site: www.lincolnshirepostpolio.org.uk

The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network takes great care in the transcription of all information that appears at this site. However, we do not accept liability for any damage resulting directly or otherwise from any errors introduced in the transcription. Neither do we accept liability for any damage resulting directly or otherwise from the information available at this site. The opinions expressed in the documents available at this site are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily constitute endorsement or approval by the Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network.

© Copyright Eddie Bollenbach 2006

© Copyright The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network 2006 – 2010.

Copyright is retained by The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network and/or original author(s). Permission is granted to print copies of individual articles for personal use provided they are printed in their entirety. Links from other Internet WWW sites are welcome and encouraged. We only ask that you let us know so that we can in future notify you of critical changes. Reproduction and redistribution of any articles via any media, with the exception of the aforementioned, requires permission from The Lincolnshire Post-Polio Network and where applicable, the original author(s).

Document preparation: Chris Salter, Original Think-tank, Cornwall, United Kingdom.

Created: 25th January 2006.

Last modification: 21st January 2010.

Last information content change: 26th January 2006.

Bollenbach Polio Biology 12 Read More »

Hypoventilation Obstructive Sleep Apnea Different Tests, Different Treatment

Hypoventilation? Obstructive Sleep Apnea?

Different Tests, Different Treatment Judith R. Fischer, MSLS, Editor, Ventilator-Assisted Living Fall 2005, Vol 19, No. 3

People with neuromuscular disorders may be misdiagnosed and mistreated when they encounter breathing and sleep problems. Many general practitioners, and even some pulmonologists, neurologists and sleep physicians, may not fully understand respiratory insufficiency and physiology in this group.

HYPOVENTILATION. Generally, in people with neuromuscular disorders who are having breathing problems, the main problem is hypoventilation (underventilation) – not breathing deeply and/or often enough. Muscle weakness, scoliosis and/or chest wall stiffness make it difficult or impossible to fully inflate the lungs.

Hypoventilation results in an imbalance in the carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) exchange in the blood – too much CO2 is retained, too little 02 is taken in. Because hypoventilation usually first occurs during sleep and because several of the signs and symptoms overlap, it can be misdiagnosed as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Although any trained health care professional can perform simple pulmonary function tests (PFTs) of breathing ability during an office visit, the tests are most likely to be performed by a pulmonologist, neurologist, nurse or respiratory therapist. The challenge lies in understanding the results of these tests in the context of a person with neuromuscular disease.

Two important measurements of your ability to breathe deeply are the forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP or PiMax). The SNIP (stiff nasal inspiratory pressure) test has been shown, in some studies, to be a more sensitive test of respiratory muscle weakness, but it is not widely used in the USA.

Forced vital capacity measures the volume of air you can breathe in and then blow out quickly and completely through a device called a spirometer. It should be measured in both the upright and supine (lying face-up) positions, because you can’t breathe as efficiently lying down.

Another simple test that measures the strength with which you can breathe in is the MIP, A mouthpiece is attached to a negative pressure gauge via a narrow tube. With a noseclip pinching off the nostrils, you exhale and then suck on the mouthpiece as hard as possible; the gauge registers the pressure.

A result of <50% predicted FVC or a MIP <60 cm H20 may signal that it’s time to get some assistance with breathing.

However, the most important factor in diagnosing hypoventilation is an elevated level of CO2 (above 45 mm Hg). This can be measured invasively with an arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis or noninvasively using exhaled end-tidal CO2 monitoring or transcutaneous CO2 monitoring.

The pattern seen on an overnight oximetry tracing may also be helpful for identifying early hypoventilation often seen first during the deepest rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep stage.

Signs and symptoms of nocturnal hypoventilation may include one or more of the following:

fatigue or exhaustion after normal activity; excessive daytime sleepiness; shortness of breath, breathlessness with minimal activity; claustrophobia or feeling that air in room is somehow bad; difficulty in speaking for more than a short time; quiet speech with fewer words per breath; inability to lie flat while awake due to shortness of breath; inability to lie flat during sleep/need to sleep sitting up (orthopnea); trouble falling asleep and trouble staying asleep; anxiety about going to sleep.

Other signs and symptoms, which may also be seen in OSA, include:

excessive daytime sleepiness and need to nap during the day; nightmares, night sweats, bedwetting, or need to urinate frequently; morning headaches; restless/fragmented sleep with frequent awakenings; shallow breathing or cessation of breathing for 10 seconds or more; awakening from sleep with choking sensation; worsening mental status, impaired memory, concentration, cognition.

Do not ignore these signs and symptoms hoping they will go away. They are serious. You may need evaluation and treatment immediately!

The treatment for hypoventilation is NOT oxygen but assisted ventilation, generally at night, with a bilevel ventilator. Bilevel units that offer the S/T mode (the unit operates in a spontaneous -S mode, meaning the user can spontaneously initiate each ventilator breath, but switches to a timed -T- mode, referred to as the backup rate, when breaths are not initiated by the individual) are recommended for people with neuromuscular disorders.

Bilevel ventilators provide pressure support ventilation which is achieved by the difference in two set pressures: IPAP (inspiratory positive airway pressure) and EPAP (expiratory positive airway pressure). The IPAP and EPAP pressure settings can be adjusted separately.

People with neuromuscular disorders have more trouble breathing in. They generally need IPAP that is set at least 5-10 cm H20 higher than EPAP and EPAP that is set at the minimum level. Higher EPAP makes it too difficult for them to exhale. “In my home care company, we start out people new to bilevel with ‘training wheels’ – a minimum span of 5 cm H20. After they become acclimated to the treatment, we increase the span if the individual is more comfortable and/or needs more volume,” says Diana Guth, RRT.

For reimbursement of a bilevel unit in the USA by Medicare, the requirements are a diagnosis of a progressive neuromuscular disorder, absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or if present it does not significantly contribute to the individual’s respiratory limitations, and one of the following test results:

FVC <50% of predicted,

MIP <60 cm H20,

  • PaCo2 arterial blood gas >45 mm Hg,

Nocturnal SpO2 (oxygen saturation) <88% for five continuous minutes while asleep.

OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (OSA). Apnea is the cessation of airflow for more than 10 seconds. OSA occurs when tissues in the throat collapse, intermittently blocking airflow during sleep. Snoring is often a major indicator of OSA, but not always.

A sleep study (polysomnogram test or PSGT) is primarily used to determine and design treatment for individuals with OSA. A sleep study is not absolutely necessary for the diagnosis in people with neuromuscular disorders but it may be helpful when first introducing the bilevel treatment.

The main breathing problem is almost always hypoventilation, although people with neuromuscular disorders early on may also have undiagnosed OSA. Most sleep labs are not equipped to measure CO2 levels, and therefore cannot diagnose hypoventilation.

The standard treatment for OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to help keep the airway open or a bilevel unit without a backup rate. *[See N.B. below]

Thanks to Josh Benditt, MD, University of Washington, Seattle (benditt@u.washington.edu); Peter Gay, MD, Mayo Clinic; Diana Guth, RRT, Home Respiratory Care, Los Angeles (Diana@hrcsleep.com); E.A. Oppenheimer, MD, (retired) Los Angeles; and Jesper Qvist, MD, Respiratory Centre East, Copenhagen, Denmark (g@dadlnet.dk), for their assistance.

N.B. From Dr. E.A. Oppenheimer’s PowerPoint Presentation at the San Francisco Bay Area PPS/Kaiser Permanante Conference in 2003

Slide 49

CPAP – continuous positive airway pressure

CPAP should not be used for a polio survivor with respiratory muscle weakness and hypoventilation CPAP is useful for polio survivors without hypoventilation (with good respiratory muscle strength) – who have sleep apnea

Note on last slide.

Polio survivors often comment that it is not the need to use a ventilator that is so difficult. It is the loss of the ability to move that is the most frustrating and requires the greatest ability to adapt to disability… this loss of independence, and the need to have someone else assist with all ADLs.

Hypoventilation Obstructive Sleep Apnea Different Tests, Different Treatment Read More »

Guidelines for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Established

ANESTHESIA NEWS

Guidelines for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Established Selma Harrison Calmes, MD, Olive View/UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California

bstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a relatively common disorder in post-polio people, is now recognized to be associated

with increased morbidity and mortality during and after anesthesia and surgery. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), the national organization for anesthesiologists, approved consensus guidelines on management of OSA patients at its annual 2005 meeting. Although the guidelines’ purpose is to focus on which OSA patients might be safely done in an outpatient facility, they are also helpful in planning for OSA patients having surgery in a hospital.

The September 2005 issue of Anesthesiology (Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 638-644) featured “Postpolio Syndrome and Anesthesia” by David A. Lambert, MD, Elenis Giannouli, MD, and Brian J. Schmidt, MD, from The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

The new guidelines rate a particular OSA patient’s risk using a numeric score. A patient with a high score should be treated in a hospital. Rated are the severity of the OSA as deter mined on a sleep study (or the clinical history if a sleep study is not available), coexisting diseases, invasiveness of the operation, the type of anesthesia need ed, anticipated postoperative narcotic requirements and how the patient would be observed post-operatively.

The guidelines also define require ments for the facility, such as on-site radiology service for chest X-rays and the ability to do arterial blood gases. The guidelines also discuss use of CPAP intraoperatively and postopera tively. The need to measure adequacy of ventilation during sedation by con tinually measuring expired CO2 (the waste respiratory gas) is emphasized; continuous monitoring of CO2 is al ways done during general anesthesia. The important postoperative period is also discussed. In addition to use of CPAP, especially for those on it pre operatively, OSA patients should be monitored for at least 3 hours longer than non-OSA patients. Monitoring should continue for about 7 hours after the last episode of airway obstruction or hypoxemia while the

patient is breathing room air and is not stimulated. Discharge guidelines are also defined.

The oxygen saturation on room air should return to baseline, and the patient should not become hypoxic or obstructed when left undisturbed. CPAP use should continue at home for those who used it preoperatively. The guidelines were developed by a consensus process, using experts in this area and careful analysis of the medical literature. They are not practice standards, do not guarantee a successful outcome and are not yet validated. Over time, we will learn more about how satisfactory they are and perhaps change them, again using the expert consensus process. However, their development is of great help for those who might be pushed into a proce dure at an outpatient facility (a free standing outsurgery center or even a physician’s office) by their insur ance company. The guidelines can be “ammunition” when fighting the insurance company about where an operation will be done. They are also helpful to anesthesiologists because they help organize thinking about a difficult problem, defining the many factors to consider. A

The guidelines are avail able at www.asahq.org/ publicationsandservices/ sleepapnea 103105.pdf.

www.post-polio.org

POST-POLIO HEALTH

Winter 2006

Vol. 22, No. 1

3

Guidelines for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Established Read More »

Post Polio Syndrome and Anaesthesia

David C. Waritier, M.D., Ph.D., Editor

Anesthesiology 2005; 103:638-14

© 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Postpolio Syndrome and Anesthesia

David A. Lambert, M.D.,* Eleni Giannouli, M.D.,+ Brian J. Schmidt, M.D.I

The development of polio vaccines 50 yr ago essentiallyPoliomyelitis: Acute illness and Recovery halted childhood polio epidemics in the industrialized world. During the past quarter century, a constellation of delayed

Although cases of poliomyelitis had been described as neuromuscular symptoms, called posipolio syndrome, became

early as 1600 BC, it was the 20th century that witnessed recognized among the aging polio survivors. The prevalence of postpolio syndrome in the U.S. population is estimated to be in

regular childhood polio epidemics. In North America, the hundreds of thousands. The most common symptoms are

these epidemics peaked in 1952-1953, with more than fatigue, pain, and new onset weakness thought to be related to 57,000 reported new cases in the United States and delayed deterioration of motor neuron function. When a pa- 17,000 new cases in Canada. Thanks to the introduction tient with postpolio syndrome presents for surgery, special

of the Salk injectable vaccine in 1955 and the Sabin oral precautions are warranted, because these patients may have

polio vaccine in 1961, these epidemics were essentially respiratory impairment, sleep apnea, swallowing difficulties, and cold intolerance. This article first reviews clinical features

brought to a halt. and some pathoetiologic theories of postpolio syndrome and

Currently, new cases of polio are mostly restricted to then focuses on anesthetic considerations including the use of Africa, South East Asia, and the Middle East. One goal of common anesthetics, neuromuscular blockade, regional anes- the World Health Organization is the worldwide eradi thesia, and general anesthetic management strategies.

cation of the polio virus by 2005. The few acute polio

myelitis cases occurring in the Western world today are POLIO survivors of the past century’s epidemics are now

associated with the low risk of transmission (1 in 2.5 entering their fifth to seventh decades of life. Some

million) of the disease from the oral polio vaccine itself, survivors have developed a constellation of signs and

usually to an immunocompromised host. symptoms referred to as postpolio syndrome (PPS). With

Poliomyelitis results from infection by one of three advancing age, patients with PPS are now presenting for

subtypes of this single-stranded RNA enterovirus. It is surgical procedures, both elective and urgent. Anesthe

transmitted by fecal-oral spread and is extremely infec siologists will be better prepared to provide safe care for

tious. Virus is replicated in the gut and lymphoid tissue.

Most (95%) infected individuals have no symptoms or these patients if equipped with a solid understanding of PPS. The following review summarizes the history of

may report mild flu-like symptoms. In the presence of polio and PPS and suggests special anesthetic consider

viremia, the central nervous system is susceptible to

invasion through an unknown mechanism. Symptoms ations when approaching patients with PPS. Patients

become more pronounced as fever and meningismus with PPS may display altered respiratory function,

develop. These individuals may later demonstrate neu chronic pain syndromes, cold intolerance, risk of aspira

rologic symptoms and signs of acute poliomyelitis infec tion, and altered sensitivity to anesthetic agents (induc

tion, asymmetric flaccid paralysis in particular. The over tion agents, inhaled anesthetics, neuromuscular agents,

all risk of paralytic polio in infected persons is 1-2%. and opioids).

The polio virus ultimately causes destruction of ante rior horn motor neurons, resulting in limb paralysis (figs.

1A and B). However, Bodiano and others in the late * Anesthesiology Resident, Department of Anesthesia, † Assistant Professor,

1940s showed that, histopathologically, all cases had Section of Respirology and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, ☆ Professor, Section of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of

some “encephalitic” changes in addition to the typical Medicine, University of Manitoba.

anterior horn cell destruction. The centers most severely Received from the Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University

affected were in the brainstem and cerebellum and in of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Submitted for publication June 14. 2004. Accepted for publication January 10, 2005. Support was provided solely

clude the reticular formation, vestibular nuclei, and roof from institutional and/or departmental sources.

nuclei of the cerebellum. In his series, Bodian reported Address reprint requests to Dr. Schmidt: Section of Neurology, Department of

that “of twenty four human autopsies there was hardly Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Room F-513. Health Sciences Centre, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada RZA 1R9. Address electronic an individual who did not have lesions, sometimes of a mail to: brian@scrc. umanitoba ca. Individual article reprints may be purchased

fairly severe degree, of most of the motor nuclei of the through the Journal Web site, www.anesthesiology.org.

  • World Health Organization Web site. Available at: http://www.polioeradi

cranial nerves as well as in the surrounding reticular cation.org/vaccines/asp. Accessed January 29, 2005.

formation.” He also commented that these findings were

Acute Polio motor neuron degeneration

found in individuals with acute poliomyelitis who died from other causes (e.g., appendicitis).

The clinical manifestations of poliomyelitis are vari able. Patients may report weakness in only one limb or may have rapid progression of complete paralysis and loss of respiratory function due to weakness. Paralysis is more often found in the legs than the arms. Children are less likely to have paralysis (1 in 1,000) with acute infection than adults (1 in 75). Brainstem symptoms (bulbar poliomyelitis) occur in 10-15% of patients, man ifesting as involvement of any of the cranial nerve nerves, facial weakness, swallowing, and phonation dif ficulties are noted in particular. Reticular formation involvement produces difficulty in swallowing, impaired respiratory control, and cardiovascular instability 8 Oc casionally, patients have cerebellar ataxia or, in the preparalytic stage, become agitated, obtunded, or dis play upper motor neuron signs,

Recovery begins after 2-3 weeks and ranges from complete resolution to major residual dysfunction (e.g., permanent respiratory difficulties, paralysis). Younger patients who have paralytic poliomyelitis have better recovery than older patients. Recovery is said to plateau at approximately 7-10 months. Treatment is mainly supportive, ranging from ventilatory assistance to splints and crutches.” Three factors contribute to recovery: (1) number of recovered motor units that resume function, (2) number of motor units that develop “sprouts” to reinnervate “orphaned” muscle fibers (becoming giant motor units fig. 1C), and (3) muscle hypertrophy.

Recovery via axonal sprouting

Postpolio Syndrome

Post-Polio Syndrome axonal sprout degeneration

Fig. 1. Postulated mechanism of postpolio syndrome. (A) Under normal conditions, a healthy lower motor unit is composed of a motor neuron cell body (located in the anterior horn of the spinal cord gray matter), the motor axon, and muscle cells (fibers) innervated by the axon. (B) The polio virus infects some motor neuron cell bodies, which subsequently die, while others survive (or were never infected). The loss of lower motor units results in muscle fiber denervation and the weakness that oc curs as a result of acute poliomyelitis. (C) Motor axon terminal sprouting reinnervates previously denervated muscle fibers, creating a “giant” motor unit. This is associated with improve ment in strength in the weeks and months after an acute attack of polio. (D) However, after many years, abnormally enlarged motor units are no longer able to maintain the extensive sprout pattern. Sprouts start to degenerate, producing new denerva tion and muscle weakness (postpolio syndrome).

As early as 1875, Charcot and others reported the recurrence of muscle weakness years after acute infec tion of poliomyelitis.9.10 It was, however, the large co hort of polio patients affected during the epidemics of the past century that really brought attention to this phenomenon. Polio survivors began to report new weak ness in the 1970s.10 Dalakas et al.” labeled the late development of progressive weakness and atrophy post poliomyelitis progressive muscular atrophy in 1986. Various authors later began to use the term postpolio syndrome, a term originally developed by patients them selves, to include other symptoms in polio survivors.12.13

In 1987, it was estimated that there were 1.6 million survivors of poliomyelitis in the United States, 14 of which 640,000 had symptoms of PPS. 15 The prevalence of PPS based on a population of 250 million, at that time, would be approximately 1 in 390 persons. By compari son, the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in 1990 was 1 in 1,000.16 However, the actual current prevalence of PPS is unknown because more recent statistics on the prev alence of PPS are unavailable. These estimates may be conservative. Given social fear and stigma surrounding

the disease during the era of epidemics, reporting of mild to moderate cases may have been suboptimal.

Criteria and Nomenclature

Postpolio syndrome symptoms include weakness, fa tigue (generalized and muscular), atrophy, and pain. Because these are nonspecific symptoms, diagnostic cri teria for PPS, based on those originally described by Mulder, have been seto, 10,17:/

predisposing polio survivors to premature motor neuron degeneration.”* Persistent “low-grade” poliovirus infec tion or reactivation has been proposed by a few studies using histochemical, polymerase chain reaction, and probe techniques to try to isolate virus, genetic material, or humoral evidence in the cerebral spinal fluid of PPS patients. 0,10,18 However, there are at least as many stud ies providing evidence against the persistent virus theo ry 0,21,22 The natural age-related decline in growth hor mone concentrations, thereby no longer helping to support cellular maintenance of giant motor neurons, has also been implicated as a contributor to PPS 23

  • history of paralytic poliomyelitis with residual motor neuron loss (confirmed by history, neurologic exami nation, and if needed, an electrodiagnostic examina

tion);

  • a period of neurologic recovery followed by an interval

(usually 15 yr or more) of neurologic and functional stability;

  • a gradual or abrupt onset of new weakness or abnor mal muscle fatigue (decreased endurance), muscle at rophy, or generalized fatigue; and exclusion of medical, orthopedic, and neurologic con ditions that may cause the above symptoms. Nomenclature in PPS can sometimes be confusing. Some authors define postpolio muscular atrophy or postpolio sequelae as conditions distinct from PPS. 6,10 The former terms are used to describe specific signs or symptoms related to previous polio infection, whereas the label PPS is used only when all criteria are met. These distinctions are of little practical importance in the assessment of a poliomyelitis survivor presenting for preanesthetic evaluation. The terms do, however, high light the nonspecific nature of symptoms in PPS, and the difficulties that can arise in making clear diagnoses. The remainder of this article will use the term PPS only.

Symptoms

The most common symptoms reported by PPS patients include fatigue and weakness, joint and muscle pain, respiratory difficulties, cold intolerance, and dysphagia. These will now be addressed individually, with focus on areas of concern and interest to anesthesia.

Fatigue and Weakness. Fatigue is the most com monly reported symptom in PPS. 6,10,24 This includes central fatigue (somnolence, difficulty concentrating) and peripheral fatigue (muscular weakness).

Central fatigue is a nonspecific symptom given the numerous potential causes, such as sleep apnea or de pression, in addition to PPS. Because previous reports described extensive lesions in the reticular activating system in acute poliomyelitis patients, Bruno et al.25 performed in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of 22 subjects with PPS who had no other conditions, medi cations, or treatment that might contribute to fatigue. These investigators found hyperintense Tl- and T2 weighted signals in the reticular activating system of 8 subjects (55%) in the high-fatigue group and in none in the low-fatigue group.

Peripheral (muscular) fatigue has also been examined using functional studies, electromyography, and muscle biopsies. All of these methods suggest that there is constant remodeling of the giant motor units, with sprouts “dropping off” and reinnervating 26,27 The most notable symptom of PPS is progressive muscular weak ness. The progression is slow and may occur in muscles previously affected by polio or, less commonly, in mus cles previously assumed to be unaffected by the original polio attack 28 The extent of new weakness seems to correlate with the severity of the acute polio infection and with the amount of recovery, i.e., individuals with greater recovery seem to have a greater chance of devel oping new weakness 29

Treatment of fatigue, both central and peripheral, pri marily involves lifestyle changes. 15,30 These include reg ular rest scheduling as well as specifically tailored exer cise programs, depending on the current functional level of the patient. Several investigators have examined the role of anticholinesterase medication in the treatment of fatigue.31-33 Oral and intravenous preparations have

Pathogenesis

There has been considerable debate over the underly ing cause of PPS. The most commonly accepted expla nation for the late effects of polio is that of “overuse or premature aging of polio-affected motor units. 96,10 The so-called giant motor units that develop on recovery are presumed to be unable to sustain the increased meta bolic demands, DNA/RNA repair, or protein synthe sis. 18,19 As such, the sprouts begin to fall off, and motor unit function deteriorates (fig. 1D). Electrophysiologic and muscle biopsy data support this theory 20 They sug gest disintegration of function of the motor units and the terminal sprouts themselves 30 – 40 yr after the acute poliomyelitis infection. There have been no conclusive studies to prove this, however. Other explanations in clude musculoskeletal disuse, normal age-related loss of the residual motor units, and vascular or glial changes

|| From Jubelt and Drucker, 10 based on a consensus of the Post Polio Task Force. Adapted with permission.

been used. Some of these studies showed improvement of electrodiagnostic features.t; however, randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated no clinical benefit in PPS patients.6.10,32,33

Pain. Pain is almost as common as fatigue in PPS patients. 6. 10,24,34 Therefore, anesthesiologists sometimes see PPS patients referred to chronic pain clinics, Reha bilitation medicine specialists have proposed three types of pain in PPS patients. Type I pain is postpolio muscle pain. It is an aching, deep or superficial muscle pain described as similar to the pain experienced during the acute polio infection. It can be precipitated by strenuous activity, stress, or cold temperatures. Type II pain is part of an “overuse” syndrome, which includes bursitis, ten donitis, myofascial, and soft tissue injuries, secondary to poor biomechanics or posture. Type III pain includes degenerative joint disease, low back pain, and nerve compression syndromes. It is the result of chronic over use, unequal loading of joints, and asymmetric muscle function secondary to weakness. For example, wrist and shoulder pain may develop in some patients secondary to long-standing use of crutches,

Treatment of pain in PPS is similar to the management of chronic pain in general. Lifestyle modifications, phys iotherapy, assist devices, analgesics, and joint or trigger point injections are the most commonly used options. A review of the treatment of muscle pain by Cohen et al.So is available in a recent issue of this journal.

Respiratory Dysfunction. One of the hallmarks of the treatment of acute poliomyelitis was the negative pressure ventilator, or iron lung. Respiratory failure sec ondary to polio, when present, was the major cause of morbidity and mortality. Respiratory symptoms occur in up to 40% of PPS patients. 37 Symptoms range from mildly decreased pulmonary function to frank respira tory failure and the need for assisted ventilation. Con tributing to these symptoms are restrictive chest wall changes (scoliosis, kyphosis), altered chest wall strength (decreased maximum inspiratory/expiratory pressures), recurrent infections, and sleep-related disordered breath ing (SRDB).

Anesthesiologists are familiar with caring for patients with respiratory problems. However, patients with SRDB, including obstructive and central sleep apnea as well as hypoventilation syndromes, can be particularly challenging. Theoretically, PPS patients are at higher risk of SRDB because of previous damage to the reticular activating system, decreased strength and tone in upper airway musculature, and increased rates of obesity due to decreased mobility. Whether PPS patients have an increased incidence of SRDB relative to healthy individ uals is not clear. However, in one study of 155 postpolio patients by Fischer, ** the symptoms of frequent waking, snoring, and daytime fatigue were reported at least five times more often than in healthy controls, Daytime sleepiness, tiredness, morning headache, and restless leg

symptoms were reported more often in PPS subjects than in healthy controls. Another study retrospectively examined 35 subjects who fit the criteria for PPS and had symptoms of SRDB.10 These investigators found three patterns of sleep disturbance: obstructive sleep apnea (n = 19), hypoventilation (n = 7), and a combination of both (n = 9). Interestingly, compared with non-PPS patients evaluated for obstructive sleep apnea by the same laboratory, PPS patients were of similar age 65 vs. 56 yr) but weighed less (176% vs. 144% ideal body weight).

Laryngeal function was examined in nine subjects with PPS. Subjects who reported severe swallowing prob lems were the same individuals who had impaired voice and laryngeal function, based on videostroboscopic eval uation, acoustical analysis, and, in three patients, laryn geal electromyography. Half of these patients were found to have unilateral vocal chord paralysis. These same patients gave a history of bulbar symptoms with their initial polio illness.

Cold Intolerance. Cold intolerance is not uncom monly reported in PPS patients. One 5-yr follow-up study of 68 PPS patients found that 65% of patients reported symptoms of cold intolerance. -4 Whether this is the result of altered perfusion to limbs secondary to vascular changes in atrophied muscles or from changes in vaso constrictor tone due to damaged sympathetic pathways is not clear. *2 Treatment is symptomatic.

Dysphagia. Dysphagia is reported by 10-20% of PPS patients. *3 Symptoms range from mild “sticking of food in the esophagus to frequent choking and symptoms of reflux disease. In one study, ultrasound and videofluo roscopy were used to evaluate swallowing function of 32 PPS patients. #4 Fourteen had symptoms of dysphagia, and 12 had a history of bulbar involvement. Interest ingly, swallowing abnormalities were revealed in 31 pa tients, regardless of the presence or absence of dyspha gia. These studies suggest that PPS patients, even if asymptomatic, may be at increased risk of both overt and silent aspiration. 40,41,43,44

Anesthesia and Postpolio Syndrome

Only four case reports discuss anesthesia and PPS.45-48 Two of these describe complications. The first report describes a 79-yr-old patient with unanticipated ventila tory failure postoperatively, which, on investigation, was thought to be the result of undiagnosed PPS 18 The second and most recent report is that of a 51-yr-old patient presenting for foot surgery related to her previ ous childhood polio illness. #6 The patient experienced acute cardiopulmonary arrest in her hospital room ap proximately 1 h postoperatively and did not recover from the resulting cerebral injury. The arrest was pre sumed to be the result of oversedation secondary to opioid administration in the presence of possible ob

structive sleep apnea. The other reports describe PPS patients who underwent anesthesia without incident (spinal anesthesia in one patient and anesthesia for elec troconvulsive therapy in the other patient). 15,47

Preoperative Assessment

Preanesthetic evaluation of a PPS patient should begin with an assessment of the history of the patient’s previ ous poliomyelitis illness. The patient’s age at the time of illness, severity (including the presence or absence of bulbar symptoms), and amount of recovery are all help ful in anticipating the likelihood of developing PPS. Doc umenting the extent of residual deficits is important to understand the patient’s baseline function. If the patient reports symptoms suggesting PPS, one should consider referral to a specialist with experience with PPS patients, such as a neurologist, if this has not already been done. In some cases, the surgical service may be unaware of the fact that their patient has PPS. Communication of this information should enhance overall patient manage ment.

Often, chronic pain syndromes are present in these patients. Evaluation of contractures or spinal deformities is important to establish a baseline and anticipate posi tioning issues that might arise intraoperatively. Although patients may already be taking oral opioid medications, many are “opioid naive.” Some patients may report ex cessive sedation with opioid or sedative hypnotic drugs, as prescribed for dental procedures, for example.

A detailed respiratory evaluation is very important in this patient population. Anesthesiologists may encounter PPS patients with no respiratory symptoms at all, or conversely, the PPS patient may have a mature tracheos tomy site and may be dependent on overnight positive pressure ventilation. Any symptoms suggestive of de creased respiratory reserve should be thoroughly evaluated with a baseline chest radiograph and spirom etry. Vital capacity of less than 50% of the predicted value, or 1,500 ml, warrants complete pulmonary func tion testing, including maximum inspiratory/expiratory pressures. Special attention should be made not to over look a history consistent with sleep apnea or hypoven tilation syndrome. This includes symptoms of morning headache, excessive daytime somnolence, and episodes of snoring or apnea during sleep. A positive history should prompt arterial blood gas sampling and consid eration of referral to a respirologist and a formal sleep study. 19 Patients with SRDB syndromes are at higher risk of cardiac dysfunction, including cor pulmonale and pulmonary hypertension.

Finally, preoperative evaluation should include an in quiry into symptoms of dysphagia and reflux disease.

is safe. Many anesthesiologists are hesitant to use re gional anesthesia in patients with preexisting neuromus cular deficits, because of the concern of exacerbating existing disease or difficulty evaluating complications. There have been no reports of adverse effects due to regional anesthesia in PPS patients, 35 but this does not necessarily mean that regional techniques are without risk

Animal studies have determined specific intrathecal concentrations of local anesthetics that are lethal for neurons.50 It is not possible to know the number of healthy versus damaged motor neurons in an individual PPS patient. However, patients with PPS have fewer motor neurons than normal, at least some of which are likely to have residual dysfunction, or increased meta bolic demand because they supply enlarged motor units (fig. 1C). These motor neurons may be more sensitive to drug effects. Therefore, theoretically, the toxic intrathe cal concentration of a local anesthetic may be lower in PPS patients. However, to date, there are no direct ex perimental data to confirm or refute this concept. There is also no evidence as to whether there is an increased risk of adverse effects using peripheral nerve blocks or indwelling catheters in PPS patients.

Ultimately, the decision to use general or regional anesthesia should be made on an individual patient basis weighing the risks and benefits. If a spinal anesthetic is selected, a medication with a long history of safety, such as hyperbaric bupivacaine, should be used.

There are several considerations when administering general anesthesia to patients with PPS. Initially, it is important to ensure that the patient is comfortably po sitioned and that attention is given to limbs with con tracture. Blankets or warming devices are particularly appropriate because of cold intolerance. Baseline twitch response to peripheral nerve stimulation should be mea sured before administering neuromuscular blockade, be cause this response might be abnormally small in some muscles. Traditionally in patients with neuromuscular disease, succinylcholine is used cautiously to avoid pre cipitating hyperkalemia. However, there are no specific data on the use of succinylcholine in patients with PPS. One study suggested that patients with a remote history of polio have increased sensitivity to nondepolarizing muscle blockers. For this reason, selection of shorter acting agents, such as rocuronium and mivacurium, along with careful titration of doses to desired effect, is important in patients with PPS. In some cases, com pletely avoiding neuromuscular blockade may be appro priate.

The fact that patients with PPS often have residual lesions involving the reticular activating system. 25 may be of particular relevance to anesthesia. The reticular activating system is a theoretical site of action for most anesthetic agents, and patients with PPS may show al tered sensitivity to anesthetic drugs. No data describing

Perioperative Considerations

An important consideration in the anesthetic manage ment of patients with PPS is whether regional anesthesia

any of the medications commonly used for regional and general anesthesia. Once aware of these considerations, anesthesiologists are better prepared to provide safe care, not only to patients with PPS, but to any patient with a history of poliomyelitis.

References

the dose-response characteristics of induction agents in patients with PPS exists, nor is it known whether there are differences in minimum alveolar concentration when patients with PPS are compared with the normal popu lation. Considering possible altered sensitivity to induc tion drugs, maintenance agents, muscle relaxants, and opioids, caution in the selection of dose of virtually any medication administered for general anesthesia should be used in this patient group.

Emergence from anesthesia should be preceded by ensuring complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The risk of aspiration is greater in at least some PPS patients. As such, selected patients may benefit from prophylactic antiemetic medication. Careful suctioning of the hypopharynx before emergence is essential. Vital capacity “big breaths” before extubation may help to recruit a maximal number of alveoli. Doses of opioids should initially be low and carefully titrated to effect, and long-acting medications should be used cautiously Other coanalgesics, such as nonsteroidal antiinflamma tory agents, should be used when possible.

Postoperative Management

As noted in the first paragraph of the Anesthesia and Postpolio Syndrome section, two reports have described postoperative complications, one resulting in death, in patients with PPS.16,48 In these two cases, postoperative respiratory failure, associated with weakness, overseda tion, or both, was deemed contributory. Therefore, the most serious anesthesia-related risk for PPS patients may be in the postoperative period. Just as it is now recog. nized that more intensive postoperative monitoring may be needed for patients with a history of obstructive sleep apnea, it would be similarly appropriate to increase one’s vigilance during postoperative monitoring of pa tients with PPS. Ambulatory surgery in this population should be considered only in select patients. It would seem prudent to avoid “fast-tracking” the transfer from the operating room immediately to the ward in patients with PPS. Finally, coughing should be encouraged. In centive spirometry and humidification of inspired gases should be considered for PPS patients in the recovery room.

  1. Paul JR: History of Poliomyelitis. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1971, pp 1-18
  2. Strebel PM, Sutter RW, Cochi SL. Biellik RJ, Brink EW, Kew OM. Pallansch MA, Orenstein WA, Hinman AR: Epidemiology of poliomyelitis in the United States one decade after the last reported case of indigenous wild virus associated disease. Clin Infect. Dis 1992: 14:568-579
  3. Rutty CJ: The middle-class plague: Epidemic polio and the Canadian state, 1936-37. Can Bull Med History 1996: 13:277-314
  4. Bodian D: Histopathological basis of clinical findings in poliomyelitis. Am J Med 1949: 6:563-78
  5. Howe HA, Wilson JL: Poliomyelitis, Viral and Rickettsial Infections of Man, 3rd edition. Edited by Rivers TM, Horsfall FL. Philadelphia. Lippincott. 1957, pp 132-78
  6. Gawne AC, Halstead LS: Post-polio syndrome: Pathophysiology and clinical management. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1995: 7:147-88
  7. Pascuzzi RM: Poliomyelitis and the post-polio syndrome. Semin Neurol 1992; 12:193-9
  8. Jubelt B, Lipton HL: Enterovirus infections, Handbook of Clinical Neurol ogy. Vol 12 66). Viral Diseases. Edited by McKendall RR. Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW Klawans HL Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1989, pp 307-47
  9. Horstmann DM: Epidemiology of poliomyelitis and allied diseases. Yale ) Biol Med 1963; 36:5-26
  10. Jubelt B, Drucker ): Poliomyelitis and the post-polio syndrome. Motor Disorders. Edited by Younger DS, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999. chapter 31. pp 381-95
  11. Dalakas MC, Elder G, Hallett M. Ravits J. Baker M. Papadopoulos N. Albrecht P. Sever J: À long-term follow-up study of patients with post-poliomy elitis neuromuscular symptoms. N Engl J Med 1986, 314:959-63
  12. Dalakas MC: Post-polio syndrome 12 years later: How it all started. The Post-polio Syndrome: Advances in the Pathogenesis and Treatment. Edited by Dalakas MC, Bartfeld H. Kurlandt LT. New York, Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995; 753:11-8
  13. Dalakas MC The post-polio syndrome is an evolved clinical entity: Deti nition and clinical description. The Post-polio Syndrome: Advances in the Patho genesis and Treatment. Edited by Dalakas MC, Bartfeld H. Kurlandt LT. New York, Ann NY Acad Sci 1995: 753:68-80
  14. Bruno RL: Post-polio sequelea: Research and treatment in the second decade. Orthopedics 1991; 14:1169-70
  15. Jubelt B, Agre JC: Characteristics and management of postpolio syndrome. JAMA 2000; 284:112-4
  16. Anderson DW. Ellenberg JH. Leventhal CM, Reingold SC Rodriguez M. Silberberg DH: Revised estimate of the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the United States. Ann Neurol 1992: 31:333-6
  17. Mulder DW, Rosenbaum RA, Layton DD: Late progression of poliomyelitis or forme fruste amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Mayo Clin Proc 1972: 47756-61
  18. Jubelt B. Cashman NR: Neurological manifestations of the post-polio syn drome. Crit Rev Neurobiol 1987; 3:199-220
  19. Tomlinson BE, Irving D: The number of limb motor neurons in the human lumbosacral cord throughout life. J Neurol Sci 1977: 34:213-9
  20. Weichers DO, Hubbel SL: Late changes in the motor unit after acute poliomyelitis. Muscle Nerve 1981; 4:524-8
  21. Melchers W. de Visser, M. Jongen P, van Loon A, Nibbeling R. Oostvogel P. Willemse D, Galama J: The post-polio syndrome: No evidence for poliovirus persistence. Ann Neurol 1992: 32:728-32
  22. Salazar-Groesoe EF, Grimaldi LM, Roos RP, Variakojis R. Jubelt B, Cashman NR: Isoelectric focusing studies of serum and cerebrospinal fluid in patients with antecedent poliomyelitis. Ann Neurol 1989: 26:709-13
  23. Shetty KR, Matsson DE, Rudman IW. Rudman D: Hyposomatomedian in men with post-poliomyelitis syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991: 39:185-91
  24. Stanghelle JK, Festvag LV: Postpolio syndrome: A 5 year follow-up. Spinal Cord 1997: 35:503-8
  25. Bruno RL, Cohen JM. Galski T, Frick NM: The Neuroanatomy of post-polio fatigue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:498-504
  26. Cashman NR, Masselli R, Wollman RL, Roos R, Simon R, Antel JP: Late denervation in patients with antecedent paralytic poliomyelitis. N Eng J Med 1987: 31729-12
  27. Hayward M, Seaton D: Late sequelae of paralytic poliomyelitis: A clinical and electromyographic study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1979; 12:117-22
  28. Cashman NR, Masselli R. Wollman RL, Simon R, Heidkamp P. Antel JP: New muscle atrophy as a late symptom of the post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Clin Ecol 1987; 5:11-13

Conclusion

Survivors of the poliomyelitis epidemics are now more than ever presenting for a variety of surgical procedures requiring anesthesia. Some of these survivors have de veloped PPS. In reviewing the pathology of acute polio myelitis and PPS itself, multiple considerations for anes thesia become apparent. These include compromised respiratory function, SRDB issues, chronic pain syn dromes, aspiration risks, and cold intolerance. In addi tion, postpolio patients may display altered sensitivity to

Anesthesiology, V 103, No 3, Sep 2005

644

LAMBERT ET AL.

  1. Klingman ), Chui H, Corgiat M. Perry ): Functional recovery. A major risk factor for the development of postpoliomyelitis muscular atrophy. Arch Neurol 1988: 45:645-7
  2. Thorsteinsson G: Management of postpolio syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 72:627-38
  3. Trojan DA. Cashman NR: Anticholinesterases in post-poliomyelitis syn drome. Ann NY Acad Sci 1995; 753:285-95
  4. Trojan DA, Collet J-P. Shapiro, S. Jubelt B, Miller RG. Agre JC, Munsat TL Hollander D. Tandan R. Granger C, Robinson A, Finch L. Ducruet T. Cashman NR: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded trial of pyridostigmine in postpolio syndrome. Neurology 1999; 53:1225-33
  5. Horemans HL Nollet F. Beclen A Drost G. Stegeman DF, Zwarts MJ. Bussmann JB, de Visser M. Lankhorst GJ: Pyridostigmine in postpolio syndrome: no decline in fatigue and limited functional improvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003: 74:1655-61
  6. Ramlow J, Alexander M. LaPorte R. Kaufmann C, Kuller L: Epidemiology of the post-polio syndrome. Am ) Epidemiol 1992; 136:769-785
  7. Koh ES, Williams AJ, Povlsen B: Upper limb pain in long-terin poliomyeli tis. QJ Med 2002: 95:389-95
  8. Cohen SP. Mullings R, Abdi S: The pharmacological treatment of muscle pain. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2004 101:495-526
  9. Halstead IS, Rossi CD: New problems in old polio patients: Results of a survey of 539 polio survivors. Orthopedics 1985: 8:845-50
  10. Fischer DA: Sleep-disordered breathing as a late effect of poliomyelitis. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1987; 23:115-20
  11. van Kralingen KW, Ivany B. van Keimpema AR, Venmans BJ. de Visser M.

Postmus PE: Sleep complaints in postpolio syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996: 7:609-11

  1. Hsu AA, Staats BA: “Postpolio” sequelae and sleep related disordered breathing. Mayo Clin Proc 1988; 7:216-24
  2. Driscoll BP. Gracco C. Coelho C, Goldstein ). Oshima K, Tierney E, Sasaki CT: Laryngeal function in postpolio patients. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:35-41
  3. Smith E, Rosenblatt P, Limauro A: The role of the sympathetic nervous system in acute poliomyelitis. } Pediatr 1949; 34:1-11
  4. Buchholz DW, Jones B: Post-polio dysphagia: Aların or caution. Orthope dics 1991: 14:1303-5
  5. Sonies BC, Dalakas MC: Dysphagia in patients with the post-polio syn drome. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1162-67
  6. Higashizawa T, Sugiura ), Takasugi Y: Spinal anesthesia in a patient with hemiparesis after poliomyelitis. Masui 2003: 52:1335-7
  7. Magi E, Recine C, Klockenbusch B, Cascianini EA: A postoperative respi ratory arrest in a post poliomyelitis patient. Anesthesia 2003; 58:8-105
  8. Liu S. Modell JH: Anesthetic management for patients with post polio syndrome receiving electroconvulsive therapy. AVISTHESIOLOGY 2001; 95:799-801
  9. Janda A: Postoperative respiratory insufficiency in patients after poliomy. elitis. Anaesthetist 1979; 28:29
  10. Bach JR: Evaluation and management of post-polio respiratory sequelae. Non-invasive options, Post Polio Syndrome Edited by Halstead LS, Grimby G Philadelphia, Hanley and Belfus, 1995, pp 89-112
  11. Hodgson PS, Neal JM. Pollock JE, Liu SS: The neurotoxicity of drugs given intrathecally (spinal). Anesth Analg 1999; 88:797-809
  12. Gyermek L: Increased potency of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants after poliomyelitis. J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30:170-3

Anesthesiology, V 103, No 3, Sep 2005

Post Polio Syndrome and Anaesthesia Read More »